• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估水权交易试点的节水和废水减排效果:来自准自然实验的证据。

Evaluating the water-saving and wastewater-reducing effects of water rights trading pilots: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.

Department of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, China; Institute of Resource, Environment and Sustainable Development Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115706. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115706. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115706
PMID:35834845
Abstract

Water rights trading is a market mechanism that promotes the conservation, protection and optimal allocation of water resources. This paper takes the water rights trading pilots' policy as a quasi-natural experiment, and then adopts the spatial difference-in-differences model to investigate the water-saving and wastewater-reducing effects of water rights trading pilots by using the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2006 to 2019. The results indicate that water rights trading has good environmental governance effects on water-saving and wastewater-reducing in the pilot areas. However, water rights transactions are mainly concentrated within provinces, and there is no spatial spillover effect. Besides, the pilot policy has more long-term dynamic effects in reducing sewage discharge than water-saving due to rebound effect possibly. The optimization of the industrial structure and environmental regulation play important roles in the realization of the policy effects of the water rights trading pilots. An important implication is that water rights trading pilots are worthy of promotion throughout China in view of the policy effects, and China should focus on inter-regional market transactions and industrial structure transformation to promote the optimization of the water rights trading mechanism.

摘要

水权交易是一种促进水资源节约、保护和优化配置的市场机制。本文以水权交易试点政策为准自然实验,利用 2006-2019 年中国 30 个省份的面板数据,采用空间双重差分模型,考察了水权交易试点的节水减排效应。结果表明,水权交易对试点地区的节水减排具有良好的环境治理效应。然而,水权交易主要集中在省内,没有空间溢出效应。此外,由于可能存在反弹效应,试点政策在减少污水排放方面的长期动态效应大于节水效应。产业结构优化和环境规制在实现水权交易试点政策效果方面发挥了重要作用。一个重要的启示是,鉴于政策效应,水权交易试点值得在全国范围内推广,中国应注重跨区域市场交易和产业结构转型,以促进水权交易机制的优化。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the water-saving and wastewater-reducing effects of water rights trading pilots: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment.评估水权交易试点的节水和废水减排效果:来自准自然实验的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115706. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115706. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Alleviating water scarcity and poverty through water rights trading pilot policy: A quasi-natural experiment based approach.通过水权交易试点政策缓解水资源短缺与贫困:基于准自然实验的方法
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 1;823:153318. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153318. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Can Water Rights Trading Scheme Promote Regional Water Conservation in China? Evidence from a Time-Varying DID Analysis.水权交易能否促进中国的区域节约用水?基于时变 DID 分析的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 14;17(18):6679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186679.
4
Resource regulation and green innovation: Evidence from China's water rights trading policy.资源调控与绿色创新:来自中国水权交易政策的证据
Environ Res. 2024 Oct 1;258:119443. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119443. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
5
The Energy Saving and Emission Reduction Effect of Carbon Trading Pilot Policy in China: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment.中国碳交易试点政策的节能减排效果:基于准自然实验的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;19(15):9272. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159272.
6
Trading our way to a greener future: how environmental rights trading reduces urban carbon emissions in China-empirical analysis based on China's emission rights trading.通过交易实现更绿色的未来:环境权交易如何减少中国城市碳排放——基于中国碳排放权交易的实证分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(10):15671-15688. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31999-7. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
7
Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading-Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China.中国 281 个城市碳交易试点对碳强度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12483. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912483.
8
Evaluating the effectiveness of the water-saving society construction in China: A quasi-natural experiment.评价中国节水型社会建设的效果:一项准自然实验。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 1;277:111394. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111394. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
9
Does China's carbon emission trading policy improve regional energy efficiency?-an analysis based on quasi-experimental and policy spillover effects.中国的碳排放交易政策是否提高了区域能源效率?——基于准实验和政策溢出效应的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(14):21166-21183. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17021-4. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
10
Quantifying the mutual effects of water trading and systematic water saving in a water-scarce watershed of China.量化中国缺水流域水权交易和系统节水的相互影响。
Water Res. 2024 Jun 15;257:121712. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121712. Epub 2024 May 1.