Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Pathology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 1, Rome, Italy.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;20(11):2505-2513.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.045. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Artificial Intelligence (AI) could support cost-saving strategies for colonoscopy because of its accuracy in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps. However, AI must meet predefined criteria to be implemented in clinical settings.
An approved computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) module for differentiating between adenoma and nonadenoma in unmagnified white-light colonoscopy was used in a consecutive series of colonoscopies. For each polyp, CADx output and subsequent endoscopist diagnosis with advanced imaging were matched against the histology gold standard. The primary outcome was the negative predictive value (NPV) of CADx for adenomatous histology for ≤5-mm rectosigmoid lesions. We also calculated the NPV for AI-assisted endoscopist predictions, and agreement between CADx and histology-based postpolypectomy surveillance intervals according to European and American guidelines.
Overall, 544 polyps were removed in 162 patients, of which 295 (54.2%) were ≤5-mm rectosigmoid histologically verified lesions. CADx diagnosis was feasible in 291 of 295 (98.6%), and the NPV for ≤5-mm rectosigmoid lesions was 97.6% (95% CI, 94.1%-99.1%). There were 242 of 295 (82%) lesions that were amenable for a leave-in-situ strategy. Based on CADx output, 212 of 544 (39%) would be amenable to a resect-and-discard strategy, resulting in a 95.6% (95% CI, 90.8%-98.0%) and 95.9% (95% CI, 89.8%-98.4%) agreement between CADx- and histology-based surveillance intervals according to European and American guidelines, respectively. A similar NPV (97.6%; 95% CI, 94.8%-99.1%) for ≤5-mm rectosigmoids was achieved by AI-assisted endoscopists assessing polyps with electronic chromoendoscopy, with a CADx-concordant diagnosis in 97.2% of cases.
In this study, CADx without advanced imaging exceeded the benchmarks required for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps. CADx could help implement cost-saving strategies in colonoscopy by reducing the burden of polypectomy and/or pathology.
gov registration number: NCT04884581.
人工智能(AI)可以通过其在结直肠息肉光学诊断中的准确性来支持结肠镜检查的节省成本策略。然而,AI 必须满足预设标准才能在临床环境中实施。
在连续进行的结肠镜检查中,使用一种经过批准的用于区分非放大白光结肠镜下腺瘤和非腺瘤的计算机辅助诊断(CADx)模块。对于每个息肉,CADx 输出和随后的内窥镜医师使用先进成像技术进行的诊断与组织学金标准相匹配。主要结果是 CADx 对≤5mm 直肠乙状结肠病变的腺瘤性组织学的阴性预测值(NPV)。我们还根据欧洲和美国的指南,计算了 AI 辅助的内窥镜医师预测的 NPV,以及 CADx 与基于组织学的息肉切除后监测间隔的一致性。
总体而言,162 名患者中切除了 544 个息肉,其中 295 个(54.2%)为组织学证实的≤5mm 直肠乙状结肠病变。295 个中的 291 个(98.6%)可以进行 CADx 诊断,≤5mm 直肠乙状结肠病变的 NPV 为 97.6%(95%CI,94.1%-99.1%)。295 个中有 242 个(82%)病变适合原位保留策略。根据 CADx 输出,544 个中的 212 个(39%)适合切除和丢弃策略,这导致 CADx 与组织学监测间隔之间的一致性分别为 95.6%(95%CI,90.8%-98.0%)和 95.9%(95%CI,89.8%-98.4%),分别根据欧洲和美国的指南。使用电子 chromoendoscopy 评估息肉的 AI 辅助内窥镜医师也获得了类似的≤5mm 直肠乙状结肠 NPV(97.6%;95%CI,94.8%-99.1%),97.2%的病例 CADx 诊断结果一致。
在这项研究中,无需先进成像的 CADx 超过了结直肠息肉光学诊断所需的基准。CADx 可以通过减少息肉切除术和/或病理学的负担来帮助实施结肠镜检查的节省成本策略。
gov 注册号:NCT04884581。