Gibiino Giulia, Binda Cecilia, Secco Matteo, Cosentino Lorenzo, Poggioli Francesco, Cappetta Stefania, Trama Davide, Fabbri Andrea, Coluccio Chiara, Fabbri Carlo
Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy.
S. C. of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):5846. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165846.
Polyp retrieval following colorectal polypectomy remains a critical step for histopathological analysis and determining appropriate surveillance intervals. Despite reported retrieval rates exceeding 90% in the literature, significant heterogeneity persists in clinical practice, particularly for polyps < 10 mm, due to the lack of standardized retrieval methods. This review synthesizes current evidence on polyp retrieval techniques, the impact of lesion size, and device-specific considerations, including suction-based methods, retrieval nets, and other approaches such as the water-bolus and water-slider techniques. We also examine the clinical utility and limitations of the "resect and discard" and "diagnose and leave in situ" strategies, highlighting barriers to widespread implementation such as medico-legal risks, variability in optical diagnosis, and discrepancies across international guidelines. The integration of advanced imaging technologies, including high-definition endoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy, and artificial intelligence-driven computer-aided diagnosis (CADx), represent promising tools to help in increasing the diagnostic accuracy of diminutive polyps. As post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations remain tethered to histological findings, this review underlines the need for updated, evidence-based frameworks that take into account technological advancements while ensuring diagnostic precision, cost-effectiveness, and patient safety in colorectal cancer prevention.
结直肠息肉切除术后的息肉回收对于组织病理学分析和确定合适的监测间隔仍然是关键步骤。尽管文献报道的回收成功率超过90%,但在临床实践中仍存在显著的异质性,特别是对于小于10mm的息肉,因为缺乏标准化的回收方法。这篇综述综合了关于息肉回收技术、病变大小的影响以及特定设备的考虑因素的现有证据,包括基于抽吸的方法、回收网以及其他方法,如水柱法和水滑法。我们还研究了“切除并丢弃”和“诊断并原位保留”策略的临床实用性和局限性,强调了广泛实施的障碍,如医疗法律风险、光学诊断的变异性以及国际指南之间的差异。先进成像技术的整合,包括高清内镜、虚拟染色内镜和人工智能驱动的计算机辅助诊断(CADx),是有助于提高微小息肉诊断准确性的有前景的工具。由于息肉切除术后的监测建议仍与组织学结果相关,这篇综述强调需要更新的、基于证据的框架,在考虑技术进步的同时,确保结直肠癌预防中的诊断准确性、成本效益和患者安全。