School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Gongchang Road 66, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Department of Economics and Management, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kronenstraβe 34, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08301-x.
In recent years, the Chinese government has been trying to improve informal-sector workers' and farmers' access to healthcare and reduce their financial burdens by introducing a plan of cost-sharing reduction, but the effect on outpatient care utilization remains unknown. Furthermore, scarce evidence has been provided to help understand the impact of cost-sharing reduction on healthcare use in low- and middle-income countries. The policy change of the coinsurance reduction for outpatient care from 75 to 55% for the enrollees of the Urban and Rural Residents Basic Medical Insurance in Taizhou, China in 2015 provides us a good quasi-experimental setting to explore such an impact.
We do a quasi-experimental study to explore the impact of coinsurance reduction on outpatient care use among the informal-sector workers and farmers aged 45 and above by estimating a fixed-effects negative binomial model with the difference-in-differences approach and the matching method. Heterogeneous effects in primary care clinics and for the older people aged 60 and above are also examined. Our data is from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2013 and 2015.
We find neither statistically significant impact of coinsurance reduction on outpatient care utilization in all health facilities for informal-sector workers and farmers aged 45 and above, nor heterogeneous effects in primary care clinics and for older people aged 60 and above.
We conclude that the coinsurance reduction cannot effectively improve the informal-sector workers' and farmers' utilization of healthcare if the cost-sharing undertaken by patients remains high even after the reduction. Besides, improving healthcare quality in primary care clinics may play a more important role than merely introducing a cost-sharing reduction plan in enhancing the role of primary care clinics as gatekeepers. We propose that only a substantial coinsurance reduction may help influence the utilization of healthcare for informal-sector workers and farmers, and enhancing the healthcare quality in primary care clinics should be given priority in low- and middle-income countries.
近年来,中国政府一直试图通过实施费用分担降低计划来改善非正规部门工人和农民获得医疗保健的机会并减轻其经济负担,但门诊服务利用率的变化尚不清楚。此外,几乎没有证据表明费用分担降低对中低收入国家医疗保健利用的影响。中国台州 2015 年对城乡居民基本医疗保险参保人员门诊费用的自付比例从 75%降低到 55%,这一政策变化为我们提供了一个很好的准实验环境来探索这种影响。
我们通过使用差分法和匹配方法的固定效应负二项式模型进行准实验研究,以探索费用分担降低对 45 岁及以上非正规部门工人和农民门诊服务利用的影响。我们还检查了基层医疗机构和 60 岁及以上老年人的异质性效应。我们的数据来自中国健康与退休纵向研究 2013 年和 2015 年的数据。
我们发现,费用分担降低对所有卫生机构中 45 岁及以上非正规部门工人和农民的门诊服务利用率没有统计学上的显著影响,在基层医疗机构和 60 岁及以上老年人中也没有异质性效应。
我们的结论是,如果患者自付费用在降低后仍然很高,那么费用分担降低并不能有效地提高非正规部门工人和农民的医疗保健利用率。此外,提高基层医疗机构的医疗质量可能比仅仅引入费用分担降低计划更能增强基层医疗机构作为守门人的作用。我们提出,只有大幅降低费用分担才可能有助于影响非正规部门工人和农民对医疗保健的利用,而提高基层医疗机构的医疗质量应在中低收入国家优先考虑。