Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者心脏再同步治疗与右心室起搏的三尖瓣反流严重程度比较

Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

作者信息

Livesay James, Fogelson Benjamin, Tahir Hassan, Baljepally Raj

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.

Heart Lung Vascular Institute, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Cardiol Res. 2022 Jun;13(3):128-134. doi: 10.14740/cr1365. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) lead placement can worsen tricuspid regurgitation (TR). TR is known to be associated with lower survival irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or pulmonary hypertension (PH). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often have PH and pre-existent TR with higher morbidity and mortality from worsening TR. Prior studies are lacking to indicate if cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be more beneficial in lessening TR in COPD patients. Therefore, we sought to study if patients with COPD will have less TR with CRT versus non-CRT devices.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis on 154 COPD patients (mean age = 71.69 ± 10.58, males = 54.14%) that required single-chamber (n = 27), dual-chamber (n = 90), or CRT (n = 37) devices. TR severity, LVEF and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) were evaluated by two cardiologists in a blinded fashion. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests were applied for continuous and categorical variables respectively. The primary endpoint was a change in the severity of TR comparing pre-device versus post-device echocardiogram. Secondary endpoints included changes in LVEF and RVSP.

RESULTS

COPD patients, who underwent a CRT device had a significantly lower incidence of worsening TR (16%) when compared to single- (37%) (P = 0.001) and dual-chamber devices (30%) (P = 0.02). The increase in RVSP was similar between the groups. There was an expected improvement in LVEF in the CRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

COPD patients receiving a CRT device were least likely to have worsening TR, compared to single- or dual-chamber devices. Since both COPD and progression in TR may result in poor outcomes, our study may suggest that an upfront strategy of CRT rather than a single- or dual-chamber device may be more beneficial in COPD patients, especially with pre-existent TR.

摘要

背景

右心室(RV)导联置入可能会加重三尖瓣反流(TR)。已知TR与较低的生存率相关,而与左心室射血分数(LVEF)或肺动脉高压(PH)无关。慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者常伴有PH且存在TR,TR恶化会导致更高的发病率和死亡率。此前缺乏研究表明心脏再同步治疗(CRT)在减轻COPD患者的TR方面是否更有益。因此,我们试图研究与非CRT装置相比,COPD患者使用CRT是否会减少TR。

方法

我们对154例需要单腔(n = 27)、双腔(n = 90)或CRT(n = 37)装置的COPD患者进行了一项回顾性单中心分析。两位心脏病专家以盲法评估TR严重程度、LVEF和右心室收缩压(RVSP)。分别对连续变量和分类变量应用方差分析(ANOVA)和卡方检验。主要终点是比较装置置入前与装置置入后超声心动图TR严重程度的变化。次要终点包括LVEF和RVSP的变化。

结果

与单腔装置(37%)(P = 0.001)和双腔装置(30%)(P = 0.02)相比,接受CRT装置的COPD患者TR恶化的发生率显著更低(16%)。各组之间RVSP的升高相似。CRT组的LVEF有预期的改善。

结论

与单腔或双腔装置相比,接受CRT装置的COPD患者TR恶化的可能性最小。由于COPD和TR进展都可能导致不良结局,我们的研究可能表明,对于COPD患者,尤其是已存在TR的患者,采用CRT的前期策略而非单腔或双腔装置可能更有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7bc/9239508/0862565799e0/cr-13-128-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验