John Jaison J, Cabello Rafael J, Hong Jimmy, Faluk Mohammed
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Cardiol Res. 2022 Jun;13(3):123-127. doi: 10.14740/cr1399. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
In practice, atrial fibrillation (AF) is typically managed by controlling ventricular rate given similar long-term outcomes and a more tolerable drug profile when compared to rhythm control. However, despite treatment via rate control, patients remain at increased risk for cardiovascular complications. This systematic review provides a summary of literature evaluating the effectiveness of early rhythm control (ERC, initiated within 2 years of diagnosis) in AF in reducing cardiovascular complications. A systematic review utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was performed to identify literature evaluating effectiveness of rhythm control strategies and cardiovascular complication reduction rates in ERC. A total of three literature articles meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included for evaluating the benefit of ERC. One of these examined was a trial that directly compared antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) versus catheter ablation (CA) therapy in maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR). This systematic review shows that ERC is associated with a reduction of cardiovascular events in AF patients compared to other treatment strategies.
在实践中,与节律控制相比,由于长期预后相似且药物耐受性更好,心房颤动(AF)通常通过控制心室率来进行管理。然而,尽管通过心率控制进行了治疗,但患者发生心血管并发症的风险仍然增加。本系统评价总结了评估早期节律控制(ERC,在诊断后2年内启动)对房颤患者减少心血管并发症有效性的文献。利用MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane系统评价数据库进行了一项系统评价,以识别评估节律控制策略有效性和早期节律控制中降低心血管并发症发生率的文献。共有三篇符合纳入和排除标准的文献文章被纳入,以评估早期节律控制的益处。其中一项研究是一项直接比较抗心律失常药物(AAD)与导管消融(CA)治疗维持窦性心律(SR)的试验。该系统评价表明,与其他治疗策略相比,早期节律控制与房颤患者心血管事件的减少有关。