• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于监督机器学习算法的腰椎引流相关脑膜炎预测。

Prediction of Lumbar Drainage-Related Meningitis Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Prevention and Treatment Institute of Chengdu, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Affiliated Fifth People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Chengdu, China.

West China Fourth Hospital/West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;10:910479. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.910479. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.910479
PMID:35836985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9273930/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar drainage is widely used in the clinic; however, forecasting lumbar drainage-related meningitis (LDRM) is limited. We aimed to establish prediction models using supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms.

METHODS

We utilized a cohort of 273 eligible lumbar drainage cases. Data were preprocessed and split into training and testing sets. Optimal hyper-parameters were archived by 10-fold cross-validation and grid search. The support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) were adopted for model training. The area under the operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and precision-recall curve (AUPRC), true positive ratio (TPR), true negative ratio (TNR), specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and kappa coefficient were used for model evaluation. All trained models were internally validated. The importance of features was also analyzed.

RESULTS

In the training set, all the models had AUROC exceeding 0.8. SVM and the RF models had an AUPRC of more than 0.6, but the ANN model had an unexpectedly low AUPRC (0.380). The RF and ANN models revealed similar TPR, whereas the ANN model had a higher TNR and demonstrated better specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and kappa efficiency. In the testing set, most performance indicators of established models decreased. However, the RF and AVM models maintained adequate AUROC (0.828 vs. 0.719) and AUPRC (0.413 vs. 0.520), and the RF model also had better TPR, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and kappa efficiency. Site leakage showed the most considerable mean decrease in accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The RF and SVM models could predict LDRM, in which the RF model owned the best performance, and site leakage was the most meaningful predictor.

摘要

背景

腰椎引流在临床上广泛应用,但对腰椎引流相关脑膜炎(LDRM)的预测有限。我们旨在使用有监督机器学习(ML)算法建立预测模型。

方法

我们使用了 273 例符合条件的腰椎引流病例的队列。数据经过预处理并分为训练集和测试集。通过 10 折交叉验证和网格搜索来确定最佳超参数。采用支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)和人工神经网络(ANN)进行模型训练。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和精确召回曲线下面积(AUPRC)、真阳性率(TPR)、真阴性率(TNR)、特异性、敏感性、准确性和kappa 系数来评估模型。所有训练模型均进行内部验证。还分析了特征的重要性。

结果

在训练集中,所有模型的 AUROC 均超过 0.8。SVM 和 RF 模型的 AUPRC 均超过 0.6,但 ANN 模型的 AUPRC 出人意料地低(0.380)。RF 和 ANN 模型的 TPR 相似,而 ANN 模型的 TNR 较高,特异性、敏感性、准确性和 kappa 效率较好。在测试集中,所建立模型的大多数性能指标均有所下降。然而,RF 和 AVM 模型仍保持了足够的 AUROC(0.828 对 0.719)和 AUPRC(0.413 对 0.520),RF 模型的 TPR、特异性、敏感性、准确性和 kappa 效率也更好。部位渗漏显示出最显著的平均准确性降低。

结论

RF 和 SVM 模型可预测 LDRM,其中 RF 模型性能最佳,部位渗漏是最有意义的预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/c74ce525f3ca/fpubh-10-910479-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/162674bf33d4/fpubh-10-910479-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/cf75d07f8aa0/fpubh-10-910479-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/853a4e8952b4/fpubh-10-910479-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/e46220ab2d70/fpubh-10-910479-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/c74ce525f3ca/fpubh-10-910479-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/162674bf33d4/fpubh-10-910479-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/cf75d07f8aa0/fpubh-10-910479-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/853a4e8952b4/fpubh-10-910479-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/e46220ab2d70/fpubh-10-910479-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c951/9273930/c74ce525f3ca/fpubh-10-910479-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of Lumbar Drainage-Related Meningitis Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms.基于监督机器学习算法的腰椎引流相关脑膜炎预测。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;10:910479. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.910479. eCollection 2022.
2
Can machine learning predict pharmacotherapy outcomes? An application study in osteoporosis.机器学习能预测药物治疗效果吗?一项在骨质疏松症中的应用研究。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Oct;225:107028. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107028. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
3
The performance of VCS(volume, conductivity, light scatter) parameters in distinguishing latent tuberculosis and active tuberculosis by using machine learning algorithm.使用机器学习算法区分潜伏性结核和活动性结核的 VCS(体积、传导率、光散射)参数的性能。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 16;23(1):881. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08531-2.
4
Establishment of noninvasive diabetes risk prediction model based on tongue features and machine learning techniques.基于舌象特征和机器学习技术的无创糖尿病风险预测模型的建立。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 May;149:104429. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104429. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
5
Electronic Medical Record-Based Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Risk of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events After Invasive Coronary Treatment: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation.基于电子病历的机器学习方法预测侵入性冠状动脉治疗后30天不良心脏事件风险:机器学习模型的开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 May 11;10(5):e26801. doi: 10.2196/26801.
6
Development and Validation of Unplanned Extubation Prediction Models Using Intensive Care Unit Data: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.基于 ICU 数据的非计划性拔管预测模型的开发和验证:回顾性、对比、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e23508. doi: 10.2196/23508.
7
Study of the prediction of gamma passing rate in dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using machine learning models based on plan complexity.基于计划复杂性的机器学习模型在调强放射治疗剂量验证中伽马通过率预测的研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 21;13:1094927. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1094927. eCollection 2023.
8
Joint modeling strategy for using electronic medical records data to build machine learning models: an example of intracerebral hemorrhage.利用电子病历数据构建机器学习模型的联合建模策略:以脑出血为例。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02018-x.
9
Application of machine learning approaches for osteoporosis risk prediction in postmenopausal women.机器学习方法在绝经后妇女骨质疏松症风险预测中的应用。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Oct 23;15(1):169. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00802-8.
10
Comparison of ischemic stroke diagnosis models based on machine learning.基于机器学习的缺血性中风诊断模型比较
Front Neurol. 2022 Dec 5;13:1014346. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1014346. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
A Machine Learning Approach for Identifying People With Neuroinfectious Diseases in Electronic Health Records: Algorithm Development and Validation.一种用于在电子健康记录中识别神经感染性疾病患者的机器学习方法:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Aug 29;13:e63157. doi: 10.2196/63157.
2
The effect of machine learning algorithms in the prediction, and diagnosis of meningitis: A systematic review.机器学习算法在脑膜炎预测和诊断中的作用:一项系统综述。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 14;7(2):e1893. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1893. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Supervised machine learning algorithms to predict the duration and risk of long-term hospitalization in HIV-infected individuals: a retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Use of Artificial Neural Networks for the Prediction of Surgical Site Infection Following TKA.人工神经网络在全膝关节置换术后手术部位感染预测中的应用。
J Knee Surg. 2023 May;36(6):637-643. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741396. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting the Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.用于预测微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后手术部位感染风险的监督式机器学习算法的开发与内部验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 20;8:771608. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.771608. eCollection 2021.
3
基于监督学习算法预测 HIV 感染者长期住院时间和风险的回顾性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1282324. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282324. eCollection 2023.
4
Construction and validation of infection risk model for patients with external ventricular drainage: a multicenter retrospective study.构建并验证脑室外引流患者感染风险模型:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Nov;165(11):3255-3266. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05771-8. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
Early prediction of central line associated bloodstream infection using machine learning.
使用机器学习技术对中心静脉导管相关性血流感染进行早期预测。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Apr;50(4):440-445. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
A review of external lumbar drainage for the management of intracranial hypertension in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤颅内高压患者采用外部腰椎引流治疗的综述。
Neurochirurgie. 2022 Feb;68(2):206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 26.
5
Predicting presumed serious infection among hospitalized children on central venous lines with machine learning.机器学习预测中心静脉置管住院患儿疑似严重感染。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 May;132:104289. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104289. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
6
How to read and review papers on machine learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: a survival guide to key methodological concepts.如何阅读和审查放射学中的机器学习和人工智能论文:关键方法学概念的生存指南。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):1819-1830. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07324-4. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
7
Lumbar drains: Practical understanding and application for the otolaryngologist.腰椎引流管:耳鼻喉科医生的实用理解与应用
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):102740. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102740. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
8
Machine Learning To Predict Serious Bacterial Infections in Young Febrile Infants.机器学习预测婴幼儿发热时严重细菌感染
Pediatrics. 2020 Sep;146(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-4096.
9
Establishment of a Nomogram for Predicting Lumbar Drainage-Related Meningitis: A Simple Tool to Estimate the Infection Risk.建立用于预测腰椎引流相关脑膜炎的列线图:一种简单的感染风险评估工具。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Apr;34(2):557-565. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01076-1. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
10
Post-Operative Infection Prediction and Risk Factor Analysis in Colorectal Surgery Using Data Mining Techniques: A Pilot Study.基于数据挖掘技术的结直肠外科术后感染预测及危险因素分析:一项初步研究
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Nov;21(9):784-792. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.138. Epub 2020 Mar 6.