• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in older adult patients (≥80 years) with primary colorectal cancer.手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)在老年(≥80岁)原发性结直肠癌患者中的疗效。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(3):1073-1080. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-838.
2
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional laparotomy in patients with colorectal cancer: Final results from a single center.结直肠癌患者手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)与传统开腹手术的比较:单中心最终结果
Oncol Lett. 2017 Jun;13(6):4953-4958. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6035. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
3
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for colorectal cancer: Interim results from a single institution.手辅助腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的比较:单机构中期结果
Oncol Lett. 2014 Aug;8(2):627-632. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2182. Epub 2014 May 27.
4
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for rectal cancer: Interim results from a single center.手辅助腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗直肠癌的比较:单中心中期结果
Mol Clin Oncol. 2015 May;3(3):533-538. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.508. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
5
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group.手辅助腹腔镜手术与标准腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病的前瞻性随机试验。手辅助腹腔镜手术研究组
Surg Endosc. 2000 Oct;14(10):896-901.
6
The Feasibility of Hand-assisted Laparoscopic and Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection Compared With Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer.手辅助腹腔镜和腹腔镜多脏器切除术与开放手术治疗局部进展期结直肠癌的可行性比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):e57-e65. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000428.
7
Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice.手辅助与腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术:微创结直肠手术的实践模式与临床结果
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):739-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9477-4.
8
Comparison of conventional laparoscopic and hand-assisted oncologic segmental colonic resection.传统腹腔镜与手辅助肿瘤性节段性结肠切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2137-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9401-y. Epub 2007 May 24.
9
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Is Superior to Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Posterosuperior Segments.对于后上段的结直肠癌肝转移,手辅助腹腔镜手术优于开腹肝切除术。
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 25;8:746427. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.746427. eCollection 2021.
10
Single-port-access, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for benign large adnexal tumors versus single-port pure laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors.经单孔入路手助腹腔镜手术与经单孔入路纯腹腔镜手术治疗附件良性大肿瘤的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):693-703. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1939-z. Epub 2011 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜手术治疗 80 岁以上与非 80 岁以上老年人大肠癌的短期和长期疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01779-2.
2
Associations of Postoperative Complications Assessed by Clavien-Dindo Classification and Comprehensive Complication Index with Long-Term Overall Survival in Elderly Patients after Radical CRC Resection.Clavien-Dindo 分级和综合并发症指数评估的术后并发症与老年 CRC 根治术后患者长期总体生存的关系。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Oct 13;15:1939-1949. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S271969. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy and Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer.手助腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术近期疗效比较。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Jun;30(3):249-256. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000768.
4
Current status of endoscopic surgery in Japan: The 14th National Survey of Endoscopic Surgery by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery.日本内镜手术的现状:日本内镜外科学会第14次全国内镜手术调查
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Jan;13(1):7-18. doi: 10.1111/ases.12768. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
5
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年与非老年患者结直肠癌腹腔镜手术的短期结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Mar;34(3):377-386. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03234-0. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
6
Treatment of Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer.老年结直肠癌患者的治疗。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Mar 11;2018:2176056. doi: 10.1155/2018/2176056. eCollection 2018.
7
Colorectal cancer surgery in the very elderly patient: a systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection.高龄患者的结直肠癌手术:腹腔镜与开放结直肠癌切除术的系统评价
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;32(9):1237-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2848-y. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
8
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional laparotomy in patients with colorectal cancer: Final results from a single center.结直肠癌患者手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)与传统开腹手术的比较:单中心最终结果
Oncol Lett. 2017 Jun;13(6):4953-4958. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6035. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
9
Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹 D3 解剖治疗 II 期或 III 期结肠癌的生存结局(JCOG0404):一项 III 期随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;2(4):261-268. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30207-2. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
10
Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in the elderly.老年人大肠癌的化疗
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5158-66. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5158.

手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)在老年(≥80岁)原发性结直肠癌患者中的疗效。

Efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in older adult patients (≥80 years) with primary colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Koike Takuya, Mukai Masaya, Abe Rin, Kamei Yutaro, Yokoyama Daiki, Uda Shuji, Higami Shigeo, Hasegawa Sayuri, Nakamura Tomoki, Tajima Takayuki, Nomura Eiji, Makuuchi Hiroyasu

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.

Tokai University Tokyo Hospital, Department of Surgery, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(3):1073-1080. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-838.

DOI:10.21037/jgo-21-838
PMID:35837154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9274078/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

From 2004 to 2014, 821 colorectal cancer primary resections were conducted at our institution. Of these, 102 patients (12.4%) were older adults over 80 years old. underwent either the conventional laparotomy group (72 patients) or the hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) group (30 patients).

METHODS

Data were extracted for 102 patients over 80 years old who underwent primary resection for colorectal cancer and were divided into two groups: conventional laparotomy (CL) (n=72) and hand-assisted laparoscopy (n=30). Pre-operative characteristics and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for age: CL group median 83.5 years old (range, 80-92 years old) and hand-assisted laparoscopy (HALS) group median 81.5 years old (range, 80-88 years old) (P=0.027). Pre-operative cardiac and lung function risk, performance status, and pathological classification stage (pStage) were almost similar between groups (P=0.668, P=0.176, P>0.999, P=0.217). No significant differences were found for operation time. The HALS group resulted in less blood loss (median 204 mL in the CL group and median 68 mL in the HALS group, P=0.003), shorter postoperative hospital stay (median was 18 days in the CL group and median was 12 days in the HALS group, P<0.001), and fewer postoperative wound infections (18 cases in the CL group and 2 cases in the HALS group, P=0.034). Five-year relapse-free survival (5Y-RFS) was 48.1% in the CL group and 73.3% in the HALS group (P=0.028). Five-year overall survival (5Y-OS) was 48.2% in the CL group and 73.3% in the HALS group (P=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 70% of surgical treatment for patients over 80 years old with colorectal carcinoma were performed by CL. However, HALS had significant advantages including less blood loss, fewer wound infections, and shorter hospital stays. Therefore, HALS could proactively be considered to older adult patients with colorectal cancer.

摘要

背景

2004年至2014年,我院共进行了821例结直肠癌一期切除术。其中,102例患者(12.4%)为80岁以上的老年人,分别接受了传统开腹手术组(72例患者)或手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)组(30例患者)。

方法

提取102例80岁以上接受结直肠癌一期切除术患者的数据,并分为两组:传统开腹手术(CL)组(n = 72)和手辅助腹腔镜手术组(n = 30)。比较术前特征和手术结果。

结果

两组患者的基线特征相似,但年龄除外:CL组中位年龄83.5岁(范围80 - 92岁),手辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)组中位年龄81.5岁(范围80 - 88岁)(P = 0.027)。两组患者术前心脏和肺功能风险、体能状态及病理分类分期(pStage)几乎相似(P = 0.668、P = 0.176、P>0.999、P = 0.217)。手术时间无显著差异。HALS组术中出血量更少(CL组中位出血量204 mL,HALS组中位出血量68 mL,P = 0.003),术后住院时间更短(CL组中位住院时间为18天,HALS组中位住院时间为12天,P<0.001),术后伤口感染更少(CL组18例,HALS组2例,P = 0.034)。CL组的5年无复发生存率(5Y - RFS)为48.1%,HALS组为73.3%(P = 0.028)。CL组的5年总生存率(5Y - OS)为48.2%,HALS组为73.3%(P = 0.027)。

结论

80岁以上结直肠癌患者约70%的手术治疗采用传统开腹手术。然而,手辅助腹腔镜手术具有显著优势,包括出血量更少、伤口感染更少以及住院时间更短。因此,对于老年结直肠癌患者可积极考虑采用手辅助腹腔镜手术。