• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing Health and Human Services Needs to Support an Plan for Prince George's County, Maryland.
Rand Health Q. 2022 Jun 30;9(3):11. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Health Policy Responsiveness: Lessons Learned from Maryland and Prince George's County.卫生政策响应性:马里兰州和乔治王子县的经验教训。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Apr;5(2):366-374. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0379-4. Epub 2017 May 27.
3
Case-comparison study protocol for gauging effects of neighbourhood trends and sickness: examining the perceptions of transit-Induced gentrification in Prince George's County.社区趋势和疾病影响评估的病例对照研究方案:检验乔治王子县对过境诱导式绅士化的看法。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 12;10(10):e039733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039733.
4
Screening for Social Determinants of Health Among Medicare Beneficiaries in Primary Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Prince George's County, Maryland.在马里兰州乔治王子县的新冠疫情期间,对初级保健中的医疗保险受益人进行健康社会决定因素筛查。
J Community Health. 2023 Oct;48(5):903-911. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01236-2. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
5
Public Libraries for Public Health: COVID-19 Response Efforts in Prince George's County, Maryland.公共图书馆助力公共卫生:马里兰州乔治王子县的 COVID-19 应对举措。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Jun;113(6):623-626. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307246. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
6
Increasing Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation Services Among Disadvantaged Populations.增加弱势人群获得心脏康复服务的机会。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30:S137-S140. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001945. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
County Exec. of Prince George's County v. Doe.乔治王子县行政长官诉多伊案
Atl Report. 1984 Aug 20;479:352-63.
9
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
10
Qualitative needs assessment: healthcare experiences of underserved populations in Montgomery County, Virginia, USA.定性需求评估:美国弗吉尼亚州蒙哥马利县服务不足人群的医疗保健经历
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1816. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

Assessing Health and Human Services Needs to Support an Plan for Prince George's County, Maryland.

作者信息

Kranz Ashley M, Chandra Anita, Madrigano Jaime, Ruder Teague, Gahlon Grace, Blanchard Janice C, King Christopher J

出版信息

Rand Health Q. 2022 Jun 30;9(3):11. eCollection 2022 Jun.

PMID:35837527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9242576/
Abstract

With evolving demographics and a changing health system landscape, the Prince George's County Council, acting as the County Board of Health, is considering its future policy approaches and resource allocations related to health and well-being. To inform this path forward, the authors of this study used primary and secondary data to describe both the health needs of county residents and drivers of health within the county, inclusive of the social, economic, built, natural, and health service environments. This study integrates these findings, an analysis of budget documents, and a review of promising practices from other communities to situate recommendations in a Health in All Policies framework to foster aligned and integrated planning and budgeting across the county to promote health and well-being. Findings from the assessment indicate a shared interest among leaders and residents to embrace a holistic strategy for health and well-being in the county. Inefficient uses of the health care system are identified, highlighting a need to rebalance investments in health care use and drivers of health. Additionally, challenges in navigating health and human services and inequities in drivers of health across communities are noted, signaling broader concerns related to residents' access to health and human services that influence health and well-being outcomes. Recommendations are provided for several paths forward for the county to pursue a more integrated policy approach to influence health and well-being outcomes.

摘要