Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
Ministère de la forêt, de la faune et des parcs, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Conserv Biol. 2022 Dec;36(6):e13976. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13976. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
Citizen science is filling important monitoring gaps and thus contributing to the conservation of rare or threatened animals. However, most researchers have used peer-reviewed publications to evaluate citizen science contributions. We quantified a larger spectrum of citizen science's contributions to the monitoring of rare or threatened animals, including contributions to the peer-reviewed publications, gray literature and to conservation measures (i.e., actions taken as a direct result of citizen science monitoring). We sought to provide broad information on how results of studies of citizen science monitoring is used. We also evaluated factors associated with success of citizen science projects. We conducted a web search to find citizen science projects focusing on rare and threatened species and surveyed citizen science project managers about their contributions and factors influencing their success. The number of projects increased rapidly after 2010. Almost one-half of the citizen science projects produced at least 1 peer-reviewed publication, 64% produced at least 1 gray literature publication, and 64% resulted in at least 1 conservation measure. Conservation measures covered a wide range of actions, including management and mitigation plans, modification of threat status, identification and establishment of protected areas, habitat restoration, control of invasive species, captive breeding programs, and awareness campaigns. Longevity, data quality, and collaboration type best explained quantities of all types of scientific contributions of citizen science. We found that citizen science contributed substantially to knowledge advancement and conservation, especially when programs were long term and had rigorous data collection and management standards, and multidisciplinary or transdisciplinary collaborations.
公民科学正在填补重要的监测空白,从而为保护珍稀或濒危动物做出贡献。然而,大多数研究人员都使用同行评议的出版物来评估公民科学的贡献。我们量化了公民科学对监测珍稀或濒危动物的更大范围的贡献,包括对同行评议出版物、灰色文献以及保护措施(即公民科学监测直接导致的行动)的贡献。我们旨在提供广泛的信息,说明如何使用公民科学监测研究的结果。我们还评估了与公民科学项目成功相关的因素。我们通过网络搜索找到了专注于珍稀和濒危物种的公民科学项目,并对公民科学项目管理人员进行了调查,了解他们的贡献以及影响其成功的因素。自 2010 年以来,项目数量迅速增加。近一半的公民科学项目至少产生了 1 篇同行评议出版物,64%的项目至少产生了 1 篇灰色文献出版物,64%的项目至少产生了 1 项保护措施。保护措施涵盖了广泛的行动,包括管理和缓解计划、威胁状况的修改、保护区的确定和建立、栖息地恢复、入侵物种的控制、圈养繁殖计划以及宣传活动。项目的寿命、数据质量和合作类型最好地解释了公民科学所有类型的科学贡献的数量。我们发现,公民科学为知识进步和保护做出了重大贡献,尤其是当项目具有长期、严格的数据收集和管理标准,以及多学科或跨学科合作时。