Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social (CIS-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal.
Centro de Psicologia da Universidade do Porto (CPUP), Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto (FPCEUP), Porto, Portugal.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Sep;140:104777. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104777. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
It is often claimed that music training improves auditory and linguistic skills. Results of individual studies are mixed, however, and most evidence is correlational, precluding inferences of causation. Here, we evaluated data from 62 longitudinal studies that examined whether music training programs affect behavioral and brain measures of auditory and linguistic processing (N = 3928). For the behavioral data, a multivariate meta-analysis revealed a small positive effect of music training on both auditory and linguistic measures, regardless of the type of assignment (random vs. non-random), training (instrumental vs. non-instrumental), and control group (active vs. passive). The trim-and-fill method provided suggestive evidence of publication bias, but meta-regression methods (PET-PEESE) did not. For the brain data, a narrative synthesis also documented benefits of music training, namely for measures of auditory processing and for measures of speech and prosody processing. Thus, the available literature provides evidence that music training produces small neurobehavioral enhancements in auditory and linguistic processing, although future studies are needed to confirm that such enhancements are not due to publication bias.
人们常说,音乐训练可以提高听觉和语言技能。然而,个别研究的结果参差不齐,而且大多数证据都是相关的,无法推断出因果关系。在这里,我们评估了 62 项纵向研究的数据,这些研究考察了音乐训练计划是否会影响听觉和语言处理的行为和大脑测量(N=3928)。对于行为数据,多元荟萃分析显示,音乐训练对听觉和语言测量都有积极的小影响,无论分配类型(随机与非随机)、训练(乐器与非乐器)和对照组(主动与被动)如何。trim-and-fill 方法提供了出版偏倚的提示性证据,但元回归方法(PET-PEESE)没有。对于大脑数据,叙述性综合也记录了音乐训练的益处,即对听觉处理的测量,以及对言语和韵律处理的测量。因此,现有文献提供的证据表明,音乐训练确实会对听觉和语言处理产生微小的神经行为增强,尽管需要进一步的研究来确认这些增强不是由于出版偏倚造成的。