• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦合并症指数评分对美国 250 万例急性心肌梗死患者治疗和结局的影响。

Influence of the Danish Co-morbidity Index Score on the Treatment and Outcomes of 2.5 Million Patients Admitted With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia; Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2022 Sep 15;179:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.06.008
PMID:35843732
Abstract

This study aimed to determine the association between the Danish Co-morbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI) and restricted DANCAMI (rDANCAMI) scores and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with AMI. Using the National Inpatient Sample, all AMI hospitalizations were stratified into four groups based on their DANCAMI and rDANCAMI score (0; 1 to 3; 4 to 5; ≥6). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, whereas secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events, major bleeding, ischemic stroke, and receipt of coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Patients with DANCAMI risk score ≥6 were more likely to suffer mortality (aOR 2.30, 95% CI 2.24 to 2.37) and bleeding (aOR 5.85, 95% CI 5.52 to 6.21) and were less likely to receive coronary angiography (aOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.34) and percutaneous coronary intervention (aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.29) compared with patients with DANCAMI score of 0. Similar results were observed for the rDANCAMI score. In conclusion, increased DANCAMI and rDANCAMI scores were associated with worse in-hospital outcomes in patients with AMI and lower odds of invasive management. The use of co-morbidity scores identifies patients at high risk of adverse outcomes and highlights disparities in care.

摘要

本研究旨在确定丹麦急性心肌梗死合并症指数(DANCAMI)和限制 DANCAMI(rDANCAMI)评分与急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院患者临床结局之间的关联。利用国家住院患者样本,根据 DANCAMI 和 rDANCAMI 评分(0;1 至 3;4 至 5;≥6),将所有 AMI 住院患者分为四组。主要结局是全因死亡率,次要结局是主要不良心血管/脑血管事件、大出血、缺血性卒中和接受冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。采用多变量逻辑回归确定调整后的优势比(aOR)及其 95%置信区间(95%CI)。DANCAMI 风险评分≥6 的患者更有可能发生死亡(aOR 2.30,95%CI 2.24 至 2.37)和出血(aOR 5.85,95%CI 5.52 至 6.21),更不可能接受冠状动脉造影(aOR 0.34,95%CI 0.33 至 0.34)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(aOR 0.29,95%CI 0.28 至 0.29),与 DANCAMI 评分为 0 的患者相比。rDANCAMI 评分也观察到类似的结果。总之,DANCAMI 和 rDANCAMI 评分升高与 AMI 患者住院期间预后较差和侵入性治疗可能性降低相关。合并症评分的使用可识别出高风险不良结局的患者,并突出了护理方面的差异。

相似文献

1
Influence of the Danish Co-morbidity Index Score on the Treatment and Outcomes of 2.5 Million Patients Admitted With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States.丹麦合并症指数评分对美国 250 万例急性心肌梗死患者治疗和结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Sep 15;179:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Invasive Management and In-Hospital Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction Patients in United States Safety-Net Hospitals.美国安全网医院中心肌梗死患者的侵入性治疗管理及院内结局
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Apr;49:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.11.006. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
3
The DANish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI): Development, Validation and Comparison with Existing Comorbidity Indices.丹麦急性心肌梗死合并症指数(DANCAMI):开发、验证及与现有合并症指数的比较
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov 20;12:1299-1311. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S277325. eCollection 2020.
4
Socioeconomic Status and Differences in the Management and Outcomes of 6.6 Million US Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.社会经济地位与 660 万美国急性心肌梗死患者管理和结局的差异。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Aug 15;129:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.05.025. Epub 2020 May 26.
5
Relation of Extracardiac Vascular Disease and Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes (1.1 Million) Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction.患有急性心肌梗死的 110 万糖尿病患者中心外血管疾病与结局的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Jul 15;175:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
Clinical Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalizations With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Analysis of Nationwide Readmissions Database.系统性红斑狼疮患者急性心肌梗死住院的临床结局:基于全国再入院数据库的分析
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101086. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.101086. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
7
Association of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Types with In-Hospital Management and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.糖尿病及其类型与急性心肌梗死患者住院管理和结局的关系。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jul;52:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
8
Invasive Management and In-Hospital Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction Patients in Rural Versus Urban Hospitals in the United States.美国农村与城市医院中心肌梗死患者的侵入性治疗管理及院内治疗结果
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jan;46:3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.08.023. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
9
Acute Myocardial Infarction in Severe Mental Illness: Prevalence, Clinical Outcomes, and Process of Care in U.S. Hospitalizations.严重精神疾病患者的急性心肌梗死:美国住院患者中的患病率、临床结局和治疗过程。
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Jul;35(7):821-830. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.04.021. Epub 2019 May 2.
10
Trends, management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in chronic liver disease.慢性肝病患者急性心肌梗死的趋势、管理与结局
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;75(4):e13841. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13841. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Multimorbidity in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征中的多种疾病共存:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JACC Adv. 2025 Jul 22;4(8):102006. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102006.