Glenthøj Andreas, Brieghel Christian, Nardo-Marino Amina, van Wijk Richard, Birgens Henrik, Petersen Jesper
Centre for Haemoglobinopathies Department of Haematology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark.
Central Diagnostic Laboratory-Research University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.
EJHaem. 2021 Sep 9;2(4):716-728. doi: 10.1002/jha2.277. eCollection 2021 Nov.
The eosin-5'-maleimide (EMA) binding test is widely used as diagnostic test for hereditary spherocytosis (HS), one of the most common haemolytic disorders in Caucasian populations. We recently described the advantages of replacing the use of healthy control blood samples with fluorescent beads in a modified EMA binding assay. In this study we further explore this novel approach. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing, modified EMA binding test and osmotic gradient ektacytometry on consecutive individuals referred to our laboratory on the suspicion of HS. In total, 33 of 95 carried a (likely) pathogenic variant, and 24 had variants of uncertain significance (VUS). We identified a total 79 different (likely) pathogenic variants and VUS, including 43 novel mutations. Discarding VUS and recessive mutations in , we used the occurrence of (likely) pathogenic variants to generate a diagnostic threshold for our modified EMA binding test. Twenty-one of 23 individuals with non- (likely) pathogenic variants had EMA ≥ 43.6 AU, which was the optimal threshold in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Accuracy was excellent at 93.4% and close to that of osmotic gradient ektacytometry (98.7%). In conclusion, we were able to simplify the EMA-binding test by using rainbow beads as reference and (likely) pathogenic variants to define an accurate cut-off value.
嗜酸性粒细胞 5'-马来酰亚胺(EMA)结合试验被广泛用作遗传性球形红细胞增多症(HS)的诊断试验,HS 是白种人群中最常见的溶血性疾病之一。我们最近描述了在改良的 EMA 结合试验中用荧光珠替代健康对照血样的优点。在本研究中,我们进一步探索这种新方法。我们对因疑似 HS 转诊至我们实验室的连续个体进行了靶向二代测序、改良的 EMA 结合试验和渗透梯度血细胞比容测定。总共 95 例中有 33 例携带(可能)致病变异,24 例有意义未明的变异(VUS)。我们共鉴定出 79 种不同的(可能)致病变异和 VUS,包括 43 种新突变。排除 VUS 和隐性突变后,我们利用(可能)致病变异的出现情况为改良的 EMA 结合试验生成诊断阈值。23 例无(可能)致病变异的个体中有 21 例 EMA≥43.6 AU,这是受试者工作特征(ROC)分析中的最佳阈值。准确率高达 93.4%,与渗透梯度血细胞比容测定法(98.7%)相近。总之,我们能够通过使用彩虹珠作为参照并利用(可能)致病变异来定义准确的临界值,从而简化 EMA 结合试验。