Satria Muhammad Aldila, Andrajati Retnosari, Supardi Sudibyo
Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia.
National Institute of Health Research and Development, Indonesian Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Malays J Med Sci. 2022 Jun;29(3):133-144. doi: 10.21315/mjms2022.29.3.13. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
Drug-related problems (DRPs) remain a major health challenge in tertiary health services such as hospitals in Indonesia. These problems are detected and solved using classification systems such as Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE). Therefore, this study aims to obtain a valid and reliable Bahasa Indonesia version of the PCNE.
A draft of the Bahasa Indonesia version of the PCNE v9.00 was discussed by four experts from May to August 2020 using the Delphi method. Furthermore, the instrument was assessed for its readability, clarity and comprehensiveness by 46 hospital pharmacists throughout Indonesia. In October 2020, two pharmacists from Haji General Hospital, Makassar, Indonesia carried out the inter-rater agreement to assess 20 cases where the proportion of coding matches between both raters were observed.
The instrument was found to be valid after passing the face and content validity, and the Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) value for each PCNE domain was 0.91, 0.89, 0.93, 0.97 and 0.93, respectively. Moreover, there was a fair agreement between the two raters that ranged between 40%-90%. Also, kappa statistics showed a substantial agreement on the 'Problems' and 'Causes' domains.
The Bahasa Indonesia version of the PCNE v9.00 instrument passed face and content validity as well as inter-agreement to be used in hospital settings.
在印度尼西亚的医院等三级医疗服务机构中，药物相关问题（DRPs）仍然是一项重大的健康挑战。这些问题通过诸如欧洲药学保健网络（PCNE）等分类系统进行检测和解决。因此，本研究旨在获得一个有效且可靠的印度尼西亚语版PCNE。
2020年5月至8月，由四位专家采用德尔菲法对印度尼西亚语版PCNE v9.00的草案进行了讨论。此外，印度尼西亚各地的46名医院药剂师对该工具的可读性、清晰度和全面性进行了评估。2020年10月，印度尼西亚望加锡哈吉总医院的两名药剂师进行了评分者间一致性评估，以评估20个案例，观察两位评分者之间编码匹配的比例。
该工具在通过表面效度和内容效度后被认为是有效的，每个PCNE领域的量表内容效度指数（S-CVI）值分别为0.91、0.89、0.93、0.97和0.93。此外，两位评分者之间的一致性尚可，范围在40%-90%之间。而且，kappa统计显示在“问题”和“原因”领域有实质性的一致性。
印度尼西亚语版PCNE v9.00工具通过了表面效度和内容效度以及一致性检验，可用于医院环境。
