Martín-Santiago Ana, Puig Susana, Arumi Daniel, Rebollo Laserna Francisco Jose
Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2022 Jun 23;96:100679. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2022.100679. eCollection 2022.
Evaluate the safety profile and tolerability of topical phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors versus vehicle as treatment for atopic dermatitis in published studies.
A search was performed in Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases on September 27, 2021, by 1 evaluator, without restrictions on publication dates or languages. Terms such as , and were included. The database searches were carried out by 1 evaluator. The titles and abstracts were reviewed for the identification and evaluation of potentially eligible studies. Study selection was made by two reviewers, so there was no intra-examiner statistic at the study selection step. The full-text articles were reviewed to determine whether or not they would be included in the systematic review. Global analyses, which included studies with both unclear and low risk of bias and subanalyses of studies with a low risk of bias were performed.
Out of 237 identified articles, 14 clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. In global analyses of studies with low and unclear risk of bias, topical treatment with PDE4 inhibitors did not differ from vehicle treatment in global treatment emergent adverse events (relative risk = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.14; = 0.94) or in serious emergent adverse events appearance (relative risk = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.39-2.20; = 0.86). In subanalyses of studies with a low risk of bias, a reduced rate of atopic dermatitis exacerbation was observed in PDE4 inhibitors compared with the vehicle (relative risk = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.98; = 0.04) and risk of pain at the application site was confirmed (relative risk = 2.59; 95% CI, 1.27-5.28; = 0.01).
PDE4 inhibitors did not show differences from vehicle treatment in treatment emergent adverse events or serious emergent adverse events incidence. In studies with low risk of bias, PDE4 inhibitors had a statistically significant risk of producing pain and reduced occurrence of atopic dermatitis exacerbation.
在已发表的研究中,评估局部用磷酸二酯酶4(PDE4)抑制剂与赋形剂相比治疗特应性皮炎的安全性和耐受性。
2021年9月27日,由1名评估人员在Medline/PubMed、科学网和考克兰图书馆数据库中进行检索,对发表日期和语言无限制。检索词包括 等。数据库检索由1名评估人员进行。对标题和摘要进行审查,以识别和评估潜在符合条件的研究。研究选择由两名审查员进行,因此在研究选择步骤不存在审查员内部统计。对全文进行审查,以确定它们是否会被纳入系统评价。进行了综合分析,其中包括偏倚风险不明确和低的研究,以及对偏倚风险低的研究的亚组分析。
在237篇已识别的文章中,14项临床试验被纳入荟萃分析。在偏倚风险低和不明确的研究的综合分析中,PDE4抑制剂局部治疗与赋形剂治疗在总体治疗中出现的不良事件(相对风险=0.99;95%CI,0.87-1.14; =0.94)或严重不良事件出现方面(相对风险=0.92;95%CI,0.39-2.20; =0.86)无差异。在偏倚风险低的研究的亚组分析中,与赋形剂相比,观察到PDE4抑制剂治疗的特应性皮炎加重率降低(相对风险=0.62;95%CI,0.39-0.98; =0.04),且应用部位疼痛风险得到证实(相对风险=2.59;95%CI,1.27-5.28; =0.01)。
PDE4抑制剂在治疗中出现的不良事件或严重不良事件发生率方面与赋形剂治疗无差异。在偏倚风险低的研究中,PDE4抑制剂有产生疼痛的统计学显著风险,且特应性皮炎加重发生率降低。