Irwin R J, McAuley S F
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 May;81(5):1557-65. doi: 10.1121/1.394508.
Eight normal listeners and eight listeners with sensorineural hearing losses were compared on a gap-detection task and on a speech perception task. The minimum detectable gap (71% correct) was determined as a function of noise level, and a time constant was computed from these data for each listener. The time constants of the hearing-impaired listeners were significantly longer than those of the normal listeners. The speech consisted of sentences that were mixed with two levels of noise and subjected to two kinds of reverberation (real or simulated). The speech thresholds (minimum signal-to-noise ratio for 50% correct) were significantly higher for the hearing-impaired listeners than for the normal listeners for both kinds of reverberation. The longer reverberation times produced significantly higher thresholds than the shorter times. The time constant was significantly correlated with all the speech threshold measures (r = -0.58 to -0.74) and a measure of hearing threshold loss also correlated significantly with all the speech thresholds (r = 0.53 to 0.95). A principal components analysis yielded two factors that accounted for the intercorrelations. The factor loadings for the time constant were similar to those on the speech thresholds for real reverberation and the loadings for hearing loss were similar to those of the thresholds for simulated reverberation.
对8名正常听力者和8名感音神经性听力损失者进行了间隙检测任务和言语感知任务的比较。根据噪声水平确定最小可检测间隙(正确率71%),并为每个受试者从这些数据中计算出一个时间常数。听力受损受试者的时间常数明显长于正常受试者。言语材料为混合了两种噪声水平并经过两种混响(真实或模拟)处理的句子。对于两种混响情况,听力受损受试者的言语阈值(正确率50%时的最小信噪比)均显著高于正常受试者。较长的混响时间产生的阈值明显高于较短的混响时间。时间常数与所有言语阈值测量指标显著相关(r = -0.58至-0.74),听力阈值损失测量指标也与所有言语阈值显著相关(r = 0.53至0.95)。主成分分析产生了两个解释相互关系的因素。真实混响情况下时间常数的因子载荷与言语阈值的因子载荷相似,模拟混响情况下听力损失的因子载荷与阈值的因子载荷相似。