Suppr超能文献

避蚊胺(DEET)与氯菊酯对……的体外杀灭效果比较

Comparison of in vitro Killing Effect of -Diethyl-Meta-Toluamide (DEET) versus Permethrin on .

作者信息

Paichitrojjana Anon, Chalermchai Thep

机构信息

School of Anti-Aging and Regenerative Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Jul 9;15:1301-1307. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S376454. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no single effective treatment for demodicosis; successful treatment requires a multimodal approach. Relapse or recurrence of demodicosis is relatively high, making the therapy challenging. Several reports have documented the successful treatment of demodicosis with acaricidal agents, which aimed at reducing the excessive number of mites and improving the patients' symptoms. Reports of irritation and resistance to topical acaricidal agents have led to the search for effective alternative treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 100 standardized skin surface biopsy (SSSB) biopsy slides from 100 patients with demodicosis were randomly divided into five groups, each with 20 slides exposed to immersion oil, -diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET) 5%, 10%, 20%, and permethrin 1%, respectively. The microscopic evaluation started immediately after the test agents exposed the mites. The survival time (ST) was defined as the interval between the first exposure of to the test agents to the time the movements ceased.

RESULTS

The differences between the median ST of DEET 5% (44 min), 10% (22 min), and 20% (14 min) were significant when compared to the negative control group (240 min) with p<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, respectively. While the median ST of permethrin 1% (42 min) was not significantly different from the median ST of DEET 5% (p=0.7395).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the dose-related acaricidal effect of DEET on . The survival times of DEET 5%, 10%, and 20% were significantly shorter than the negative control (immersion oil). DEET 5% had a comparable in vitro killing effect as permethrin 1%. Further in vivo studies are necessary to determine the clinical efficacy in patients with demodicosis.

摘要

背景

对于蠕形螨病尚无单一有效的治疗方法;成功的治疗需要采用多模式方法。蠕形螨病的复发率相对较高,这使得治疗具有挑战性。一些报告记录了使用杀螨剂成功治疗蠕形螨病的案例,其目的是减少螨虫数量并改善患者症状。关于局部杀螨剂刺激和耐药性的报告促使人们寻找有效的替代治疗方法。

材料与方法

将来自100例蠕形螨病患者的100张标准化皮肤表面活检(SSSB)玻片随机分为五组,每组20张,分别暴露于 immersion oil、5%避蚊胺(DEET)、10%DEET、20%DEET和1%氯菊酯中。在测试剂接触螨虫后立即开始显微镜评估。存活时间(ST)定义为从首次接触测试剂到活动停止的时间间隔。

结果

与阴性对照组(240分钟)相比,5%DEET(44分钟)、10%DEET(22分钟)和20%DEET(14分钟)的中位ST差异显著,p值分别<0.001、<0.001、<0.001。而1%氯菊酯的中位ST(42分钟)与5%DEET的中位ST无显著差异(p = 0.7395)。

结论

本研究证明了DEET对[此处原文有缺失信息]的剂量相关杀螨作用。5%、10%和20%DEET的存活时间明显短于阴性对照(immersion oil)。5%DEET在体外具有与1%氯菊酯相当的杀灭效果。需要进一步的体内研究来确定其对蠕形螨病患者的临床疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7aa/9278725/02f5581285b4/CCID-15-1301-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验