Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 8, 33720 Tampere, Finland.
Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 8, 33720 Tampere, Finland.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115747. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115747. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
At conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), reject waters originating from the dewatering of anaerobically digested sludge contain the highest nitrogen concentrations within the plant and thereby have potential for realising nitrogen recovery in a reusable form. At the same time, nitrogen removal from reject waters has potential to reduce the energetic and chemical demands of the WWTP due to a reduced nutrient load to the activated sludge process. In recent years, (bio)electrochemical methods have been extensively studied for nitrogen recovery from reject waters in laboratory-scale but not yet implemented in real WWTP environments, particularly due to concerns about the need for large capital investments. This study assessed the techno-economic feasibility of retrofitting a (bio)electrochemical nitrogen removal and recovery (NRR) unit into the reject water circulation line of a full-scale WWTP through modelling. Data from laboratory-scale (bio)electroconcentration ((B)EC) experiments was used to construct a simple, semi-empirical model block integrated into the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2 (BSM2) simulating a generalised WWTP. The effects of nitrogen removal from the reject water on both the effluent quality and operational costs of the WWTP were assessed and compared to the BSM2 performance without an NRR unit. In all studied scenarios, the effluent quality index was improved by 4-11%, while both the aeration (7-19% decrease) and carbon (24-71%) requirements were reduced. The additional energy consumed by the NRR unit increased the total operational cost index by >18%, but the revenue assumed for the generated nutrient product (20 EUR kg) was enough to make the BEC-NRR scenarios at realistically low current densities (1 and 5 A m) economically attractive compared to the control. A sensitivity analysis revealed that electricity price and nutrient product value had the most notable effects on the feasibility of the NRR unit. The results suggest a key factor in making (bio)electrochemical NRR economically viable is to reduce its electricity consumption further, while the anticipated increases in nitrogen fertiliser prices can help accelerate the adoption of these methods in larger scale.
在传统的废水处理厂(WWTP)中,来自厌氧消化污泥脱水的剩余水含有工厂内最高的氮浓度,因此具有以可重复使用的形式实现氮回收的潜力。同时,由于向活性污泥工艺的养分负荷减少,从剩余水中去除氮有可能降低 WWTP 的能源和化学需求。近年来,(生物)电化学方法已在实验室规模上广泛研究用于从剩余水中回收氮,但尚未在实际 WWTP 环境中实施,特别是由于担心需要大量的资本投资。本研究通过建模评估了在全规模 WWTP 的剩余水循环线中 retrofit(生物)电化学氮去除和回收(NRR)单元的技术经济可行性。使用来自实验室规模(生物)电浓缩(B)EC 实验的数据构建了一个简单的半经验模型块,集成到模拟通用 WWTP 的基准模拟模型 2(BSM2)中。评估了从剩余水中去除氮对 WWTP 出水质量和运营成本的影响,并与没有 NRR 单元的 BSM2 性能进行了比较。在所有研究的情况下,出水质量指数提高了 4-11%,同时曝气(减少 7-19%)和碳(减少 24-71%)需求都降低了。NRR 单元消耗的额外能量使总运营成本指数增加了>18%,但假设为生成的养分产品(20 欧元/千克)带来的收入足以使 BEC-NRR 方案在实际较低的当前密度(1 和 5 A/m)下具有经济吸引力,与对照相比。敏感性分析表明,电价和养分产品价值对 NRR 单元的可行性有最显著的影响。结果表明,使(生物)电化学 NRR 在经济上可行的关键因素是进一步降低其用电量,而预期的氮肥价格上涨将有助于加速这些方法在更大规模上的采用。