Suppr超能文献

南非 Kessler-10 的建构效度和因子结构。

Construct validity and factor structure of the Kessler-10 in South Africa.

机构信息

Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Cape Town, South Africa.

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2022 Jul 18;10(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00883-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10) is a short screening tool developed to identify, with good sensitivity, non-specific psychological distress in the general population. Sensitivity and specificity of the K-10 have been examined in various clinical populations in South Africa; however, other psychometric properties, such as construct validity and factor structure, have not been evaluated. We present evidence of the prevalence and severity of psychological distress in an outpatient setting in South Africa and evaluate the internal reliability, construct validity, and factor structure of the K-10 in this population.

METHODS

We explored prevalence estimates of psychological distress using previously established cutoffs and assessed the reliability (consistency) of the K-10 by calculating Cronbach's alpha, item-total correlations and omega total and hierarchical coefficients. Construct validity and factor structure of the K-10 were examined through split-sample exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), comparing several theoretical models and the EFA.

RESULTS

Overall, there was low prevalence of psychological distress in our sample of 2591 adults, the majority of whom were between the ages of 18-44 (77.7%). The K-10 showed good construct validity and reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 and omega total of 0.88. EFA yielded a four-factor solution with likely measurement artifacts. CFA showed that the four-factor model from EFA displayed the best comparative fit indices, but was likely overfitted. The unidimensional model with correlated errors was deemed the best fitting model based on fit indices, prior theory, and previous studies.

CONCLUSION

The K-10 displays adequate psychometric properties, good internal reliability, and good fit with a unidimensional-factor structure with correlated errors. Further work is required to determine appropriate cutoff values in different populations and clinical subgroups within South Africa to aid in determining the K-10's clinical utility.

摘要

背景

凯斯勒心理困扰量表(K-10)是一种简短的筛查工具,旨在识别一般人群中的非特异性心理困扰,具有良好的敏感性。该量表在南非的各种临床人群中进行了敏感性和特异性的检验;然而,其他心理测量学特性,如结构效度和因子结构,尚未得到评估。我们提供了南非门诊环境中心理困扰的患病率和严重程度的证据,并评估了该人群中 K-10 的内部信度、结构效度和因子结构。

方法

我们使用先前确定的切点来探讨心理困扰的患病率估计,并通过计算克朗巴赫的 alpha、项目总分相关和 omega 总分和层次系数来评估 K-10 的可靠性(一致性)。通过分样本探索性因素分析(EFA),然后进行验证性因素分析(CFA),来检验 K-10 的结构效度和因子结构,比较了几种理论模型和 EFA。

结果

总体而言,我们的 2591 名成年人样本中,心理困扰的患病率较低,大多数人年龄在 18-44 岁之间(77.7%)。K-10 显示出良好的结构效度和可靠性,克朗巴赫的 alpha 为 0.84,omega 总分为 0.88。EFA 产生了一个四因素的解决方案,可能存在测量上的人为因素。CFA 显示,EFA 的四因素模型显示出最佳的比较拟合指数,但可能过度拟合。基于拟合指数、先验理论和以前的研究,单维模型与相关误差被认为是最佳拟合模型。

结论

K-10 具有足够的心理测量学特性,内部信度良好,与具有相关误差的单维因子结构的拟合度良好。需要进一步的工作来确定南非不同人群和临床亚组中的适当切点值,以帮助确定 K-10 的临床实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/9290237/62062516ee8f/40359_2022_883_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验