Piovan Gianluca, Farinelli Luca, Screpis Daniele, Iacono Venanzio, Povegliano Lorenzo, Bonomo Marco, Auregli Ludovica, Zorzi Claudio
Department of Orthopaedics, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Clinical Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022 Jul 18;34(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s43019-022-00164-0.
Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) and distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) represent surgical solutions in cases of valgus malalignment and isolated lateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical results, complications, and the overall postoperative alignment of a series of DFO and lateral UKA with a minimum 2-year follow-up in active middle-aged patients.
Patients with valgus knee and isolated lateral OA who underwent opening-wedge DFO or UKA from 2017 to 2019 were reviewed. Each patient was characterized by a joint line convergence angle (JLCA) > 3° and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) < 87°. We excluded patients who underwent meniscus or osteochondral allograft during DFO. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), complications, and postoperative alignment were assessed. Propensity score matching was used to identify comparable patients.
The DFO and lateral UKA groups consisted of 29 patients each. No statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), length of follow-up, or limb deformity were reported between the two groups. In the DFO group, OKS was reported to improve from 27.51 to 38.59 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 51.14 to 67.2 (p < 0.05). Similarly, in the UKA group, OKS improved from 26.23 to 35.43 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 50.12 to 65.91 (p < 0.05). However, the improvement in OKS and KOOS (delta) did not differ between groups (p = 0.35 and p = 0.95). The DFO and UKA groups were characterized by similar postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle measurements of -3.26 and -3.00, respectively (p = 0.65). No patients in the UKA group underwent revision or other knee surgeries during follow-up. No infections were detected in either group. In the DFO group, no cases of nonunion or delayed union were reported. However, 40% of DFO patients underwent plate removal. One patient in each group was characterized by progression of medial OA with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade > 3.
UKA and DFO represent an effective treatment in lateral knee OA with intra-articular and extra-articular deformity. Both surgeries were able to provide a significant and comparable clinical improvement.
III, comparative retrospective cohort study.
外侧单髁关节置换术(UKA)和股骨远端截骨术(DFO)是治疗膝关节外翻畸形和单纯外侧骨关节炎(OA)的手术方法。本研究的目的是评估一系列DFO和外侧UKA在活跃的中年患者中至少随访2年的临床结果、并发症及术后整体对线情况。
回顾2017年至2019年接受开放性楔形DFO或UKA治疗的膝关节外翻和单纯外侧OA患者。每位患者的关节线汇聚角(JLCA)>3°,机械性股骨外侧远端角(mLDFA)<87°。我们排除了在DFO期间接受半月板或骨软骨同种异体移植的患者。评估牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)、并发症及术后对线情况。采用倾向评分匹配法确定可比患者。
DFO组和外侧UKA组各有29例患者。两组在性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、随访时间或肢体畸形方面均无统计学显著差异。在DFO组,OKS从27.51提高到38.59(p<0.05),KOOS从51.14提高到67.2(p<0.05)。同样,在UKA组,OKS从26.23提高到35.43(p<0.05),KOOS从50.12提高到65.91(p<0.05)。然而,两组间OKS和KOOS的改善程度(差值)无差异(p=0.35和p=0.95)。DFO组和UKA组术后髋-膝-踝(HKA)角测量值分别为-3.26和-3.00,相似(p=0.65)。UKA组在随访期间无患者接受翻修或其他膝关节手术。两组均未检测到感染。在DFO组,未报告骨不连或延迟愈合病例。然而,40%的DFO患者接受了钢板取出术。每组各有1例患者出现内侧OA进展,Kellgren-Lawrence(KL)分级>3级。
UKA和DFO是治疗伴有关节内和关节外畸形的外侧膝关节OA的有效方法。两种手术均能带来显著且相当的临床改善。
III级,比较性回顾性队列研究。