Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
HUS Pharmacy, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
JAMA. 2022 Jul 19;328(3):251-258. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10461.
In cardiac surgery, albumin solution may maintain hemodynamics better than crystalloids and reduce the decrease in platelet count and excessive fluid balance, but randomized trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of these approaches in reducing surgical complications.
To assess whether 4% albumin solution compared with Ringer acetate as cardiopulmonary bypass prime and perioperative intravenous volume replacement solution reduces the incidence of major perioperative and postoperative complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized, double-blind, single-center clinical trial in a tertiary university hospital during 2017-2020 with 90-day follow-up postoperatively involving patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting; aortic, mitral, or tricuspid valve surgery; ascending aorta surgery without hypothermic circulatory arrest; and/or the maze procedure were randomly assigned to 2 study groups (last follow-up was April 13, 2020).
The patients received in a 1:1 ratio either 4% albumin solution (n = 693) or Ringer acetate solution (n = 693) as cardiopulmonary bypass priming and intravenous volume replacement intraoperatively and up to 24 hours postoperatively.
The primary outcome was the number of patients with at least 1 major adverse event: death, myocardial injury, acute heart failure, resternotomy, stroke, arrhythmia, bleeding, infection, or acute kidney injury.
Among 1407 patients randomized, 1386 (99%; mean age, 65.4 [SD, 9.9] years; 1091 men [79%]; 295 women [21%]) completed the trial. Patients received a median of 2150 mL (IQR, 1598-2700 mL) of study fluid in the albumin group and 3298 mL (IQR, 2669-3500 mL) in the Ringer group. The number of patients with at least 1 major adverse event was 257 of 693 patients (37.1%) in the albumin group and 234 of 693 patients (33.8%) in the Ringer group (relative risk albumin/Ringer, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.95-1.27; P = .20), an absolute difference of 3.3 percentage points (95% CI, -1.7 to 8.4). The most common serious adverse events were pulmonary embolus (11 [1.6%] in the albumin group vs 8 [1.2%] in the Ringer group), postpericardiotomy syndrome (9 [1.3%] in both groups), and pleural effusion with intensive care unit or hospital readmission (7 [1.0%] in the albumin group vs 9 [1.3%] in the Ringer group).
Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, treatment with 4% albumin solution for priming and perioperative intravenous volume replacement solution compared with Ringer acetate did not significantly reduce the risk of major adverse events over the following 90 days. These findings do not support the use of 4% albumin solution in this setting.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02560519.
在心脏外科手术中,白蛋白溶液可能比晶体溶液更好地维持血液动力学,减少血小板计数下降和过度液体平衡,但需要随机试验来比较这些方法在减少手术并发症方面的效果。
评估 4%白蛋白溶液与醋酸林格氏液相比,作为心肺转流预充液和围手术期静脉输液替代液,是否能降低接受心脏手术患者的主要围手术期和术后并发症的发生率。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在 2017 年至 2020 年期间在一家三级大学医院进行的随机、双盲、单中心临床试验,有 90 天的术后随访,包括接受体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者;主动脉瓣、二尖瓣或三尖瓣手术;不使用低温循环停搏的升主动脉手术;和/或迷宫手术。患者被随机分为 2 个研究组(最后随访时间为 2020 年 4 月 13 日)。
患者接受 1:1 比例的 4%白蛋白溶液(n=693)或醋酸林格氏液(n=693)作为心肺转流预充液和术中及术后 24 小时内的静脉输液替代液。
主要结局是至少发生 1 项主要不良事件的患者人数:死亡、心肌损伤、急性心力衰竭、胸骨切开后再手术、中风、心律失常、出血、感染或急性肾损伤。
在 1407 名随机患者中,1386 名(99%;平均年龄 65.4[标准差 9.9]岁;1091 名男性[79%];295 名女性[21%])完成了试验。白蛋白组患者接受中位数为 2150 毫升(IQR,1598-2700 毫升)的研究液,林格组为 3298 毫升(IQR,2669-3500 毫升)。白蛋白组有 257 名(37.1%)患者至少发生 1 项主要不良事件,林格组有 234 名(33.8%)患者(白蛋白/林格相对风险,1.10;95%置信区间,0.95-1.27;P=0.20),绝对差异为 3.3 个百分点(95%置信区间,-1.7 至 8.4)。最常见的严重不良事件是肺栓塞(白蛋白组 11 例[1.6%],林格组 8 例[1.2%])、心包切开后综合征(两组均 9 例[1.3%])和胸腔积液伴重症监护病房或医院再入院(白蛋白组 7 例[1.0%],林格组 9 例[1.3%])。
在接受体外循环心脏手术的患者中,与醋酸林格氏液相比,4%白蛋白溶液用于心肺转流预充液和围手术期静脉输液替代液治疗,在接下来的 90 天内,主要不良事件的风险没有显著降低。这些发现不支持在这种情况下使用 4%白蛋白溶液。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02560519。