O'Neil M K, Lancee W J, Freeman S J
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987 Jun;175(6):354-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198706000-00005.
Inconsistent findings in studies of loss and depression arise from methodological differences, lack of common definitions of depression and loss, and the failure to consider the interaction hypothesis: the effect of early loss on depression is partly conditional on the presence of a current loss. Data were collected from 744 university students. Only 15% of subjects without loss vs. 44% with both types of loss had Beck Depression Inventory scores indicative of moderate depression. Analysis of variance confirmed this strong interaction effect. These results provide empirical support for Freud's view that a recent loss can reactivate depressive feelings associated with earlier loss.
关于丧失与抑郁的研究结果不一致,原因在于方法学差异、缺乏对抑郁和丧失的共同定义,以及未能考虑交互作用假说:早期丧失对抑郁的影响部分取决于当前是否存在丧失。数据收集自744名大学生。没有经历丧失的受试者中只有15%的人贝克抑郁量表得分表明有中度抑郁,而经历了两种丧失的受试者中这一比例为44%。方差分析证实了这种强烈的交互作用效应。这些结果为弗洛伊德的观点提供了实证支持,即近期的丧失会重新激活与早期丧失相关的抑郁情绪。