Parker Gordon, McCraw Stacey, Paterson Amelia
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.
J Affect Disord. 2015 May 1;176:43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.063. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
The independence or interdependence of grief and major depression has been keenly argued in relation to recent DSM definitions and encouraged the current study.
We report a phenomenological study seeking to identify the experiential and phenomenological differences between depression and grief as judged qualitatively by those who had experienced clinical (n=125) or non-clinical depressive states (n=28).
Analyses involving the whole sample indicated that, in contrast to grief, depression involved feelings of hopelessness and helplessness, being endless and was associated with a lack of control, having an internal self-focus impacting on self-esteem, being more severe and stressful, being marked by physical symptoms and often lacking a justifiable cause. Grief was distinguished from depression by the individual viewing their experience as natural and to be expected, a consequence of a loss, and with an external focus (i.e. the loss of the other). Some identified differences may have reflected the impact of depressive "type" (e.g. melancholia) rather than depression per se, and argue for a two-tiered model differentiating normative depressive and grief states at their base level and then "clinical" depressive and 'pathological' grief states by their associated clinical features.
Comparative analyses between the clinical and non-clinical groups were limited by the latter sub-set being few in number. The provision of definitions may have shaped subjects׳ nominated differentiating features.
The study identified a distinct number of phenomenological and clinical differences between grief and depression and few shared features, but more importantly, argued for the development of a two-tiered model defining both base states and clinical expressions.
关于近期《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)的定义,悲伤与重度抑郁症之间的独立性或相互依存性一直存在激烈争论,这也推动了当前的研究。
我们报告了一项现象学研究,旨在确定抑郁症和悲伤之间在体验和现象学上的差异,这些差异由经历过临床抑郁状态(n = 125)或非临床抑郁状态(n = 28)的人进行定性判断。
对整个样本的分析表明,与悲伤相比,抑郁症涉及绝望和无助感,是无尽的,与缺乏控制感相关,具有内在的自我关注,影响自尊,更严重且压力更大,以身体症状为特征,且往往缺乏合理的原因。悲伤与抑郁症的区别在于,个体将自己的经历视为自然且可预期的,是失去的结果,并且关注外部(即他人的丧失)。一些已确定的差异可能反映了抑郁“类型”(如忧郁症)的影响,而非抑郁症本身,并支持一种两级模型,该模型在基础层面区分正常抑郁和悲伤状态,然后根据其相关临床特征区分“临床”抑郁和“病理性”悲伤状态。
临床组和非临床组之间的比较分析受到后者样本数量较少的限制。定义的提供可能影响了受试者提名的区分特征。
该研究确定了悲伤与抑郁症之间在现象学和临床方面存在明显差异,共同特征较少,但更重要的是,主张开发一种两级模型来定义基础状态和临床表现。