• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业人员对养老院基于知识的姑息治疗转变的准备情况:教育干预后的定性随访研究。

Professionals´ readiness for change to knowledge-based palliative care at nursing homes: a qualitative follow-up study after an educational intervention.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 157, 221 00, Lund, SE, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 20;21(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01018-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-022-01018-y
PMID:35854375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9412037/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a global increase in the number of people who are dying of old age. This development implies a need for good palliative care among older persons at the end of life. Here nursing homes have an important role to play. However, the principles of palliative care have not been sufficiently applied in nursing homes, and there is a need to increase the implementation of palliative care in these settings. Therefore the project named Implementation of Knowledge-Based Palliative Care in Nursing Homes (the KUPA project, to use its Swedish acronym) was started as a contribution to filling this knowledge gap. The aim of the present study was to investigate the professionals' experiences of readiness for change to knowledge-based palliative care at nursing homes after the educational intervention within the KUPA project.

METHODS

The focus group method was used to interview 39 health-care professionals with the aid of semistructured questions based on the Organizational Readiness for Change theoretical framework. Six focus groups were formed at six nursing homes in two counties in southern Sweden. The groups included different types of professionals: assistant nurses, nurses, occupational therapists, physiotherapists and social workers. The analysis was conducted with an abductive approach and included deductive and inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed one overarching theme: hopeful readiness for change in palliative care despite remaining barriers. The main categories were increased knowledge facilitating development, enhanced team spirit, uncertainty about future plans connected with hopeful readiness and remaining organizational barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds knowledge and understanding concerning professionals' readiness for change palliative care in nursing homes and shows how ready nursing home settings undertake these changes in practice. The Organizational Readiness for Change theory proved suitable for application in nursing homes to assess the professionals' experiences and to evaluate educational interventions regardless of the organization's readiness for change.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials NCT02708498 , first registration 15/03/2016.

摘要

背景

全球范围内,因年老而死亡的人数不断增加。这种发展趋势意味着,临终老年人需要良好的姑息治疗。在这种情况下,养老院扮演着重要的角色。然而,姑息治疗原则在养老院并未得到充分实施,因此需要在这些环境中增加姑息治疗的实施。正因如此,“瑞典知识为本的姑息治疗在养老院的实施(KUPA 项目)”应运而生,旨在填补这一知识空白。本研究旨在调查在 KUPA 项目的教育干预后,养老院专业人员对知识为本的姑息治疗改变的准备情况。

方法

使用焦点小组方法,借助基于组织变革准备理论框架的半结构化问题,对来自瑞典南部两个县的 39 名医护专业人员进行了访谈。在 6 家养老院组建了 6 个焦点小组,小组包含了不同类型的专业人员:助理护士、护士、职业治疗师、物理治疗师和社会工作者。分析采用了归纳推理法,包括演绎和归纳内容分析。

结果

分析揭示了一个总主题:对姑息治疗变革持有的充满希望的准备态度,尽管仍存在障碍。主要类别包括促进发展的知识增长、增强的团队精神、与充满希望的准备相关的未来计划的不确定性以及仍存在的组织障碍。

结论

本研究增加了对养老院姑息治疗变革准备情况的了解和认识,并展示了养老院环境在实践中是如何接受这些变革的。组织变革准备理论被证明适用于评估专业人员的经验和评估教育干预,而无论组织变革的准备情况如何。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials NCT02708498,首次注册日期 2016 年 3 月 15 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/9412037/ceb1bf5569a0/12904_2022_1018_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/9412037/ceb1bf5569a0/12904_2022_1018_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bd6/9412037/ceb1bf5569a0/12904_2022_1018_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Professionals´ readiness for change to knowledge-based palliative care at nursing homes: a qualitative follow-up study after an educational intervention.专业人员对养老院基于知识的姑息治疗转变的准备情况:教育干预后的定性随访研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 20;21(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01018-y.
2
Professionals' Expectations and Preparedness to Implement Knowledge-Based Palliative Care at Nursing Homes before an Educational Intervention: A Focus Group Interview Study.专业人员在接受教育干预前对在养老院实施基于知识的姑息治疗的期望和准备情况:焦点小组访谈研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178977.
3
Towards evidence-based palliative care in nursing homes in Sweden: a qualitative study informed by the organizational readiness to change theory.迈向瑞典养老院基于证据的姑息治疗:一项基于组织变革准备理论的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 4;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0699-0.
4
Early and late signs that precede dying among older persons in nursing homes: the multidisciplinary team's perspective.养老院中老年人临终前的早期和晚期征象:多学科团队的观点。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0825-0.
5
Implementation of knowledge-based palliative care in nursing homes and pre-post post evaluation by cross-over design: a study protocol.基于知识的临终关怀在养老院的实施及前后交叉设计评价:研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Mar 22;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0308-2.
6
Quality of Life among Next of Kin of Frail Older People in Nursing Homes: An Interview Study after an Educational Intervention concerning Palliative Care.养老院虚弱老年人的亲属的生活质量:姑息治疗教育干预后的访谈研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;19(5):2648. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052648.
7
Evaluation of person-centeredness in nursing homes after a palliative care intervention: pre- and post-test experimental design.养老院姑息治疗干预后的以患者为中心的评估:前后测试实验设计。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 May 31;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0431-8.
8
Palliative care delivery at nursing homes before and after an educational intervention from professionals' perspective: A pre-post design.从专业人员视角看教育干预前后养老院姑息治疗的提供情况:一项前后对照设计。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2023 Mar;37(1):229-242. doi: 10.1111/scs.13084. Epub 2022 May 6.
9
A painful experience of limited understanding: healthcare professionals' experiences with palliative care of people with severe dementia in Norwegian nursing homes.一种有限理解的痛苦体验:挪威疗养院中医疗保健专业人员对患有严重痴呆症的人的姑息治疗体验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Feb 13;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0282-8.
10
"You close the door, wipe your sadness and put on a smiling face": a qualitative study of the emotional labour of healthcare professionals providing palliative care in nursing homes in France.“关门,擦干眼泪,换上笑脸”:法国养老院姑息治疗医护人员情绪劳动的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1070. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11550-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Managers' perceptions of organizational readiness for change within disability healthcare: a Swedish national study with an embedded mixed-methods approach.管理者对残疾医疗保健领域组织变革准备情况的认知:一项采用嵌入式混合方法的瑞典全国性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 6;25(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12808-4.
2
Current and emerging PCSK9-directed therapies to reduce LDL-C and ASCVD risk: A state-of-the-art review.降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的当前及新兴的前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素9(PCSK9)靶向疗法:最新综述
Pharmacotherapy. 2025 Jan;45(1):54-65. doi: 10.1002/phar.4635. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Enablers and barriers to implementing care quality improvement program in nursing homes in China.在中国养老院实施护理质量改进计划的促成因素和障碍。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Oct 7;21(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02488-0.
2
Professionals' Expectations and Preparedness to Implement Knowledge-Based Palliative Care at Nursing Homes before an Educational Intervention: A Focus Group Interview Study.专业人员在接受教育干预前对在养老院实施基于知识的姑息治疗的期望和准备情况:焦点小组访谈研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178977.
3
Exploring the Team Climate of Health and Social Care Professionals Implementing Integrated Care for Older People in Europe.
Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.
影响老年护理创新实施的因素:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Dec 29;22(1):61-80. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407.
4
The Experiences of Nursing Managers in Implementing Palliative Care in Long-Term Care Facilities.护理管理者在长期护理机构实施姑息治疗的经验
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Dec 15;16:4053-4070. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S442467. eCollection 2023.
探索欧洲为老年人提供综合护理的健康与社会护理专业人员的团队氛围。
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Oct 19;20(4):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5467.
4
Abductive reasoning in nursing: Challenges and possibilities.护理中的溯因推理:挑战与可能性。
Nurs Inq. 2021 Jan;28(1):e12374. doi: 10.1111/nin.12374. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
Redefining Palliative Care-A New Consensus-Based Definition.重新定义姑息治疗——基于共识的新定义
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Oct;60(4):754-764. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
Strategies for the implementation of palliative care education and organizational interventions in long-term care facilities: A scoping review.长期护理机构中姑息治疗教育和组织干预措施的实施策略:范围综述。
Palliat Med. 2020 May;34(5):558-570. doi: 10.1177/0269216319893635. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
Dying in long-term care facilities in Europe: the PACE epidemiological study of deceased residents in six countries.在欧洲的长期护理机构中死亡:六个国家死亡居民的 PACE 流行病学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7532-4.
8
Evaluation of person-centeredness in nursing homes after a palliative care intervention: pre- and post-test experimental design.养老院姑息治疗干预后的以患者为中心的评估:前后测试实验设计。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 May 31;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0431-8.
9
The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions.全球严重健康相关痛苦负担不断加剧:按世界区域、年龄组和健康状况预测到 2060 年的情况。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul;7(7):e883-e892. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30172-X. Epub 2019 May 22.
10
Nursing Home Staff Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing a Quality Improvement Intervention.养老院工作人员对实施质量改进干预措施的障碍和促进因素的看法。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):810-815. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.139. Epub 2019 Mar 7.