Center for Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI.
New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):810-815. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.139. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
Quality improvement (QI) may be a promising approach for staff to improve the quality of care in nursing homes. However, little is known about the challenges and facilitators to implementing QI interventions in nursing homes. This study examines staff perspectives on the implementation process.
We conducted semistructured interviews with staff involved in implementing an evidence-based QI intervention ("LOCK") to improve interactions between residents and staff through targeted staff behavior change. The LOCK intervention consists of 4 practices: (1) Learn from the bright spots, (2) Observe, (3) Collaborate in huddles, and (4) Keep it bite sized.
We interviewed staff members in 6 Veterans Health Administration nursing homes [ie, Community Living Centers (CLCs)] via opportunistic and snowball sampling.
The semistructured interviews were grounded in the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model of behavior change and covered staff experience, challenges, facilitators, and lessons learned during the implementation process. The interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis.
Overall, staff accepted the intervention and appreciated the focus on the positives. Challenges fell largely within the categories of capability and opportunity and included difficulty finding time to complete intervention activities, inability to interpret data reports, need for ongoing training, and misunderstanding of study goals. Facilitators were largely within the motivation category, including incentives for participation, reinforcement of desired behavior, feasibility of intervention activities, and use of data to quantify improvements.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: As QI programs become more common in nursing homes, it is critical that interventions are tailored for this unique setting. We identified barriers and facilitators of our intervention's implementation and learned that no challenge was insurmountable or derailed the implementation of LOCK. This ability of frontline staff to overcome implementation challenges may be attributed to LOCK's inherently motivational features. Future nursing home QI interventions should consider including built-in motivational components.
质量改进(QI)可能是员工提高养老院护理质量的一种有前途的方法。然而,对于在养老院实施 QI 干预措施所面临的挑战和促进因素知之甚少。本研究考察了员工对实施过程的看法。
我们对参与实施一项基于证据的 QI 干预措施(“LOCK”)的员工进行了半结构化访谈,该干预措施旨在通过有针对性的员工行为改变来改善居民与员工之间的互动。LOCK 干预措施包括 4 种实践:(1)从亮点中学习,(2)观察,(3)在小组会议中协作,以及(4)保持适度。
我们通过机会抽样和滚雪球抽样,在 6 个退伍军人事务部(VA)养老院(即社区生活中心(CLC))中对员工进行了访谈。
半结构化访谈以行为变化的能力、机会、动机、行为(COM-B)模型为基础,涵盖了员工在实施过程中的经验、挑战、促进因素和经验教训。访谈采用主题内容分析法进行分析。
总的来说,员工接受了干预措施,并赞赏了对积极因素的关注。挑战主要属于能力和机会范畴,包括完成干预活动的时间困难、无法解释数据报告、需要持续培训以及对研究目标的误解。促进因素主要属于动机范畴,包括参与激励、强化期望行为、干预活动的可行性以及使用数据量化改进。
结论/意义:随着 QI 计划在养老院中变得越来越普遍,对干预措施进行量身定制对于这一独特的环境至关重要。我们确定了我们干预措施实施的障碍和促进因素,并了解到没有挑战是不可逾越的,也没有使 LOCK 的实施脱轨。一线员工克服实施挑战的能力可能归因于 LOCK 固有的激励特性。未来的养老院 QI 干预措施应考虑纳入内置的激励性组件。