Kuang Da, Liao Kuei-Hsien
School of Architecture & Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University, New Taipei City, 237 Taiwan.
Clim Change. 2022;173(1-2):6. doi: 10.1007/s10584-022-03401-3. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
Property-level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) has received significant attention in recent years, as flood resilience has become increasingly important in flood risk management. Earlier studies have indicated that learning from flood experiences can affect flood risk perception and the adoption of PLFRA measures; however, it remains unclear whether and how this learning process can be affected by flood control infrastructure-specifically, the level of flood resistance it offers. This study attempts to answer the question: Do people living in environments with different levels of flood resistance learn different lessons from flood experience, manifested in flood risk perception and PLFRA? We present a comparative study of the rural village of Xinnongcun and the urban community of Nanhuyayuan in Central China. In-person interviews with a total of 34 local residents were conducted to understand how flood experiences affect flood risk perception and PLFRA. We find that learning from flood experiences in the highly flood-resistant environment (Nanhuyayuan) does not contribute to flood risk perception but further enhances flood resistance, whereas learning in a less flood-resistant environment (Xinnongcun) leads to a better understanding of flood risk and promotes PLFRA. We argue that flood resistance can affect the learning from flood experiences. High flood resistance can suppress PLFRA through a different learning process that involves learning inertia and path dependency. In the search for flood resilience, this begs society to re-examine the widespread assertion that both structural and nonstructural measures are important in flood risk management.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10584-022-03401-3.
近年来,物业层面的洪水风险适应(PLFRA)受到了广泛关注,因为抗洪能力在洪水风险管理中变得越来越重要。早期研究表明,从洪水经历中学习会影响洪水风险认知以及PLFRA措施的采用;然而,尚不清楚这个学习过程是否以及如何受到防洪基础设施的影响——具体而言,是其提供的防洪水平的影响。本研究试图回答这个问题:生活在不同防洪水平环境中的人们是否会从洪水经历中学到不同的经验教训,并体现在洪水风险认知和PLFRA中?我们对中国中部的新农村村和南湖雅苑城市社区进行了一项比较研究。对总共34位当地居民进行了面对面访谈,以了解洪水经历如何影响洪水风险认知和PLFRA。我们发现,在防洪能力强的环境(南湖雅苑)中从洪水经历中学习对洪水风险认知没有帮助,但会进一步增强防洪能力,而在防洪能力较弱的环境(新农村村)中学习则会使人们对洪水风险有更好的理解并促进PLFRA。我们认为,防洪能力会影响从洪水经历中学习的过程。高防洪能力会通过一个涉及学习惯性和路径依赖的不同学习过程来抑制PLFRA。在寻求抗洪能力的过程中,这促使社会重新审视一个广泛的观点,即结构性和非结构性措施在洪水风险管理中都很重要。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10584-022-03401-3获取的补充材料。