Mass Emergencies Programme, Institute of International Sociology Gorizia, Italy.
Disasters. 2012 Apr;36(2):316-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01252.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
This paper reports on research work performed for Floodsite a European Community-funded project on the social aspects of vulnerability in the Adige/Sarca river basin of the Trentino-Alto Adige region, Italy. It identifies some limitations to the use of a fixed set of indicators, which fail to account for either local peculiarities or the intangible aspects that contribute to the shaping of social vulnerability. The authors employed a number of methods to investigate the opinions of professionals and residents on risk and safety, distinguishing between the individual and the institutional components of social vulnerability. Adopting a systemic perspective, they explored the interactions between these two elements, showing how they may give rise to unexpected phenomena. The 'safety paradox' and the 'efficiency paradox' are discussed, emerging when increased protection provided by structural devices and dedicated institutions translates into a lack of awareness and agency on the part of residents.
本文报告了 Floodsite 项目的研究工作,该项目是欧共体资助的一个项目,研究意大利特伦蒂诺-上阿迪杰地区阿迪杰/萨卡河流域脆弱性的社会方面。本文指出,使用固定的指标集存在一些局限性,因为这些指标集无法考虑到当地的特殊性或对社会脆弱性形成有贡献的无形方面。作者采用了多种方法来调查专业人员和居民对风险和安全的看法,区分了社会脆弱性的个体和制度组成部分。采用系统观点,他们探讨了这两个要素之间的相互作用,展示了它们如何可能产生意想不到的现象。本文讨论了“安全悖论”和“效率悖论”,当结构装置和专门机构提供的增加的保护转化为居民缺乏意识和行动时,就会出现这些悖论。