• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科脊柱侧弯的差异:种族和保险类型对青少年特发性脊柱侧弯非手术治疗机会的影响。

Disparities in Pediatric Scoliosis: The Impact of Race and Insurance Type on Access to Nonoperative Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

机构信息

Jackie and Gene Autry Orthopaedic Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Children's Hospital New Orleans, LSU Health Science Center, New Orleans.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Sep 1;42(8):427-431. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002213. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002213
PMID:35856501
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has evidence-based, nonoperative treatments proven to be effective with early diagnosis and prompt treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify potential disparities in access to nonoperative treatment for AIS. Specifically, we sought to determine the interaction of socioeconomic factors on a major curve magnitude and recommend treatment at the initial presentation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of AIS patients who underwent surgery at a single tertiary pediatric hospital between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018 was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups for comparison: patients with public insurance (PUB) and those with private insurance (PRV). Primary variables analyzed were patient race, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), major curve magnitude, and treatment recommendation at the initial presentation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of the major curve magnitude at presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 341 patients met the inclusion criteria; PUB and PRV groups consisted of 182 (53.4%) and 159 (46.6%) children, respectively. Overall, the major curve magnitude at presentation was significantly higher in PUB compared with PRV patients (50.0° vs. 45.1°; P =0.004) and higher in Black patients compared to White patients (51.8 vs. 47.0, P =0.042). Surgery was recommended for 49.7% of the PUB group and 43.7% of the PRV group. A lesser number of PUB patients had curve magnitudes within the range of brace indications (≤40°) compared to PRV patients (22.5% vs. 35.2%, respectively; P =0.010). The odds of having an initial major curve magnitude <40 degrees were 67% lower among Black patients with public insurance compared to Black patients with private insurance (OR=0.33; 95% CI: 0.13-0.83; P =0.019).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated disparity in access to nonoperative treatment for pediatric scoliosis. Black patients with public insurance were the most at-risk to present with curve magnitudes exceeding brace indications. Future work focused on understanding the reasons for this significant disparity may help to promote more equitable access to effective nonoperative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)有循证的非手术治疗方法,早期诊断和及时治疗效果显著。本研究的目的是确定 AIS 非手术治疗机会的潜在差异。具体而言,我们试图确定社会经济因素对主要曲线幅度的相互作用,并在初次就诊时建议治疗。

方法

对 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日在一家单中心儿科医院接受手术的 AIS 患者进行了回顾性研究。患者分为两组进行比较:有公共保险(PUB)和有私人保险(PRV)的患者。主要分析变量为患者种族、区域贫困指数(ADI)、主要曲线幅度和初始就诊时的治疗建议。进行了单变量和多变量分析以确定就诊时主要曲线幅度的预测因素。

结果

共有 341 名患者符合纳入标准;PUB 和 PRV 组分别包括 182 名(53.4%)和 159 名(46.6%)儿童。总体而言,PUB 组患者就诊时的主要曲线幅度明显高于 PRV 组(50.0°比 45.1°;P=0.004),黑人患者高于白人患者(51.8°比 47.0°;P=0.042)。PUB 组有 49.7%的患者推荐手术,PRV 组有 43.7%的患者推荐手术。与 PRV 患者相比,PUB 患者的曲线幅度在支具适应证范围内(≤40°)的比例较低(分别为 22.5%和 35.2%;P=0.010)。与私人保险的黑人患者相比,公共保险的黑人患者初次就诊时主要曲线幅度<40 度的可能性低 67%(比值比=0.33;95%置信区间:0.13-0.83;P=0.019)。

结论

本研究表明,儿童脊柱侧凸非手术治疗机会存在差异。有公共保险的黑人患者最有可能出现超过支具适应证的曲线幅度。未来的研究工作集中于了解这种显著差异的原因,可能有助于促进青少年特发性脊柱侧凸更公平地获得有效的非手术治疗。

证据水平

III。

相似文献

1
Disparities in Pediatric Scoliosis: The Impact of Race and Insurance Type on Access to Nonoperative Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.儿科脊柱侧弯的差异:种族和保险类型对青少年特发性脊柱侧弯非手术治疗机会的影响。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Sep 1;42(8):427-431. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002213. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
Disease severity and treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the impact of race and economic status.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的疾病严重程度与治疗:种族和经济状况的影响。
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):939-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.043. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
3
Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curve Severity.社会健康决定因素对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸曲线严重程度的影响。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2024 Feb 1;44(2):e168-e173. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002529. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
4
Lower socioeconomic status is not associated with severity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched cohort analysis.社会经济地位较低与青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的严重程度无关:一项匹配队列分析。
Spine Deform. 2023 Sep;11(5):1071-1078. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00686-x. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
Socioeconomic, Racial, and Insurance Disparities in Clinical Outcomes After Surgery Among Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis.特发性脊柱侧凸患者手术临床结局的社会经济、种族和保险差异。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2024 Feb 1;44(2):e163-e167. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002551. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
6
The outcome of a modified version of the Cheneau brace in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a retrospective study.基于SRS和SOSORT标准的改良式Cheneau支具治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)的疗效:一项回顾性研究
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Oct;52(5):618-629. Epub 2016 May 4.
7
Insurance status does not predict curve magnitude in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at first presentation to an orthopaedic surgeon.在初次就诊于骨科医生时,保险状态并不能预测青少年特发性脊柱侧弯的弯曲程度。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jan;35(1):39-42. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000184.
8
Brace Success Is Related to Curve Type in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.支具治疗的成功与青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的脊柱侧弯类型有关。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 7;99(11):923-928. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01050.
9
Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management.青少年特发性脊柱侧弯支具研究标准的规范化:脊柱侧弯研究学会支具与非手术治疗委员会
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2068-75; discussion 2076-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000178819.90239.d0.
10
Curve Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With a Minimum of 2 Years' Follow-up After Completed Brace Weaning With Reference to the SRS Standardized Criteria.参照SRS标准化标准,对完成支具停用后至少随访2年的青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者的曲线进展情况进行研究。
Spine Deform. 2016 May;4(3):200-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of the social determinants of health on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.健康的社会决定因素对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的影响:一项系统综述
Spine Deform. 2025 Jul;13(4):997-1006. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01065-4. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
2
Influence of socioeconomic deprivation and geographic disparities in the management of surgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicentric retrospective cohort in Northern France.社会经济剥夺和地理差异对外科治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的影响:法国北部的一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Eur Spine J. 2024 Nov 24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08556-4.
3
Achieving Health Equity: Combatting the Disparities in American Access to Musculoskeletal Care : Disparities Exist in Every Aspect of Orthopaedic Care in the United States - Access to Outpatient Visits, Discretionary and Unplanned Surgical Care, and Postoperative Outcomes. What Can We Do?
实现健康公平:消除美国肌肉骨骼护理方面的差异:美国骨科护理的各个方面都存在差异——门诊就诊机会、选择性和非计划性手术护理以及术后结果。我们能做些什么?
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024 Nov;17(11):449-455. doi: 10.1007/s12178-024-09926-7. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
4
How Long Can You Delay? Curve Progression While Awaiting Vertebral Body Tethering Surgery.你能拖延多久?等待椎体束缚手术期间的曲线进展
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 11;13(8):2209. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082209.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Musculoskeletal Care.儿科肌肉骨骼护理中的种族和族裔差异。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023 Oct;16(10):488-492. doi: 10.1007/s12178-023-09860-0. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
6
An Examination of the Number of Adolescent Scoliotic Curves That Are Braceable at First Presentation to a Scoliosis Service.对初次就诊于脊柱侧弯诊疗机构时可使用支具治疗的青少年脊柱侧弯曲线数量的检查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(3):445. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030445.