Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Science. 2022 Jul 8;377(6602):186-191. doi: 10.1126/science.abm7192. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
Two models describe solvent transport through swollen, nonporous membranes. The pore-flow model, based on fluid mechanics, works for porous membranes, whereas the solution-diffusion model invokes molecular diffusion to treat nonporous membranes. Both approaches make valid arguments for swollen polymer membranes, but they disagree in their predictions of intramembrane pressure and concentration profiles. Using a fluid-solid model that treats the solvent and membrane matrix as separate phases, we show both classical models to be valid, to represent complementary approaches to the same phenomenon, and to make identical predictions. The fluid-solid model clarifies recent reverse osmosis measurements; provides a predictive and mechanistic basis for empirical high-pressure limiting flux phenomena, in quantitative agreement with classic measurements; and gives a framework to treat nonporous but mechanically heterogeneous membrane materials.
两种模型描述了溶剂通过溶胀的无孔膜的传输。基于流体力学的孔流模型适用于多孔膜,而溶液扩散模型则利用分子扩散来处理无孔膜。这两种方法都对溶胀聚合物膜提出了合理的论点,但它们在膜内压力和浓度分布的预测上存在分歧。使用将溶剂和膜基质视为单独相的流固模型,我们证明了这两种经典模型都是有效的,可以代表对同一现象的互补方法,并做出相同的预测。流固模型澄清了最近的反渗透测量;为经验性高压极限通量现象提供了预测和机械基础,与经典测量定量一致;并为处理无孔但机械不均匀的膜材料提供了框架。