Yoshiura Takayuki, Masuda Takanori, Sato Tomoyasu, Kikuhara Yukari, Kobayashi Yukie, Ishibashi Tooru, Oku Takayuki, Yoshida Masato, Funama Yoshinori
Department of Medical Technology, Tsuchiya General Hospital.
Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kumamoto University.
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2022 Aug 20;78(8):856-863. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2022-1194. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
We retrospectively evaluated the visualization of pediatric coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images by using the 64-detector row CT scanner between the electrocardiogram-gated helical scan and non-electrocardiogram-gated helical scan.
From January 2015 to March 2019, 100 children who underwent CT angiography examination were retrospectively enrolled. Group A consisted of 50 patients with electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. Group B consisted of 50 patients with non-electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. All patients were scanned using a 64-detector row CT scanner (LightSpeed VCT), and helical scans were acquired. The CT scanning parameters were 0.4-s rotation, 0.625-mm slice thickness, 0.24 (group A) helical pitch (beam pitch), 1.375 (group B) helical pitch (beam pitch), 80 kVp, and 50-300 mA (noise index 40). A retrospective method was used for electrocardiogram gated. To compare the radiation dose, CT volume dose index (CTDI) and dose length product (DLP) displayed on the console were recorded. The visualization scores of the coronary artery images were compared between each group.
In group A, CTDI and DLP values were 6.74 (1.05-11.97) mGy and 79.87 (15.90-146.65) mGy·cm, respectively. In group B, CTDI and DLP values were 0.51 (0.39-0.95) mGy and 8.15 (6.30-17.50) mGy·cm, respectively. There were significant differences in CTDI and DLP values between both groups (p<0.05). The visualization rates for the proximal and distal coronary arteries were 88% and 54% for the right coronary artery, 84% and 58% for the left anterior descending artery, and 66% and 30% for the left circumflex branch in group A, respectively. The visualization rates for the proximal and distal coronary arteries were 52% and 0% for the right coronary artery, 56% and 0% for the left anterior descending artery, and 32% and 0% for the left circumflex branch in group B.
In 64-row multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), the visualization rates for the proximal and distal coronary arteries were significantly higher in the electrocardiogram-gated scan, but the exposure dose was several times higher in the pediatric CCTA. For accurate diagnosis in pediatric coronary arteries, electrocardiogram-gated helical scan should be performed.
我们回顾性评估了在心电图门控螺旋扫描和非心电图门控螺旋扫描之间,使用64排CT扫描仪对小儿冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)图像的可视化情况。
回顾性纳入2015年1月至2019年3月期间接受CT血管造影检查的100例儿童。A组由50例行心电图门控螺旋扫描的患者组成。B组由50例行非心电图门控螺旋扫描的患者组成。所有患者均使用64排CT扫描仪(LightSpeed VCT)进行扫描,并进行螺旋扫描。CT扫描参数为0.4秒旋转时间、0.625毫米层厚、A组0.24(束流 pitch)螺旋 pitch、B组1.375(束流 pitch)螺旋 pitch、80 kVp以及50 - 300 mA(噪声指数40)。采用回顾性方法进行心电图门控。记录控制台显示的辐射剂量、CT容积剂量指数(CTDI)和剂量长度乘积(DLP)。比较两组之间冠状动脉图像的可视化评分。
A组中,CTDI和DLP值分别为6.74(1.05 - 11.97)mGy和79.87(15.90 - 146.65)mGy·cm。B组中,CTDI和DLP值分别为0.51(0.39 - 0.95)mGy和8.15(6.30 - 17.50)mGy·cm。两组之间CTDI和DLP值存在显著差异(p<0.05)。A组中,右冠状动脉近端和远端的可视化率分别为88%和54%,左前降支为84%和58%,左旋支为66%和30%。B组中,右冠状动脉近端和远端的可视化率分别为52%和0%,左前降支为56%和0%,左旋支为32%和0%。
在64排多层螺旋CT(MDCT)中,心电图门控扫描时冠状动脉近端和远端的可视化率显著更高,但在小儿CCTA中其暴露剂量高出数倍。对于小儿冠状动脉的准确诊断,应进行心电图门控螺旋扫描。