• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现有检测方法与新型非侵入性检测方法在呼吸道疾病患者侵袭性曲霉病检测中的应用比较

Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases.

作者信息

Xiao Wei, Du Longyi, Cai Linli, Miao Tiwei, Mao Bing, Wen Fuqiang, Gibson Peter Gerard, Gong Deying, Zeng Yan, Kang Mei, Du Xinmiao, Qu Junyan, Wang Yan, Liu Xuemei, Feng Ruizhi, Fu Juanjuan

机构信息

Respiratory Group, Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.

Divison of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610093, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Jul 25;135(13):1545-54. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050.

DOI:10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050
PMID:35861304
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9532040/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although existing mycological tests (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] galactomannan [GM], serum GM, serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan [BDG], and fungal culture) are widely used for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in non-hematological patients with respiratory diseases, their clinical utility in this large population is actually unclear. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and utility of existing tests and explore the efficacy of novel sputum-based Aspergillus assays.

METHODS

Existing tests were assessed in a prospective and consecutive cohort of patients with respiratory diseases in West China Hospital between 2016 and 2019 while novel sputum assays (especially sputum GM and Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device [LFD]) in a case-controlled subcohort. IPA was defined according to the modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were computed for each test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The entire cohort included 3530 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 66, no IPA = 3464) and the subcohort included 127 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 38, no IPA = 89). Sensitivity of BAL GM (≥1.0 optical density index [ODI]: 86% [24/28]) was substantially higher than that of serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 38% [39/102]) ( χ2  = 19.83, P   <  0.001), serum BDG (≥70 pg/mL: 33% [31/95]) ( χ2  = 24.65, P  < 0.001), and fungal culture (33% [84/253]) ( χ2  = 29.38, P  < 0.001). Specificity varied between BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI: 94% [377/402]), serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 95% [2130/2248]), BDG (89% [1878/2106]), and culture (98% [4936/5055]). Sputum GM (≥2.0 ODI) had similar sensitivity (84% [32/38]) (Fisher's exact P  = 1.000) to and slightly lower specificity (87% [77/89]) ( χ2  = 5.52, P  = 0.019) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI). Area under the ROC curve values were comparable between sputum GM (0.883 [0.812-0.953]) and BAL GM (0.901 [0.824-0.977]) ( P  = 0.734). Sputum LFD had similar specificity (91% [81/89]) ( χ2  = 0.89, P  = 0.345) to and lower sensitivity (63% [24/38]) ( χ2  = 4.14, P  = 0.042) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI), but significantly higher sensitivity than serum GM (≥0.5 ODI) ( χ2  = 6.95, P  = 0.008), BDG ( χ2  = 10.43, P  = 0.001), and fungal culture ( χ2  = 12.70, P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum GM, serum BDG, and fungal culture lack sufficient sensitivity for diagnosing IPA in respiratory patients. Sputum GM and LFD assays hold promise as rapid, sensitive, and non-invasive alternatives to the BAL GM test.

摘要

背景

尽管现有的真菌学检测(支气管肺泡灌洗术[BAL]半乳甘露聚糖[GM]、血清GM、血清(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖[BDG]和真菌培养)广泛用于诊断非血液系统呼吸系统疾病患者的侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA),但其在这一庞大人群中的临床实用性实际上尚不清楚。我们旨在通过评估现有检测的诊断准确性和实用性来解决这一临床不确定性,并探索新型痰基曲霉检测方法的有效性。

方法

2016年至2019年期间,在华西医院对一组前瞻性连续呼吸系统疾病患者进行现有检测评估,同时在一个病例对照亚组中评估新型痰检测方法(尤其是痰GM和曲霉特异性侧向流动装置[LFD])。IPA根据改良的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/真菌病研究组标准进行定义。计算每项检测的敏感性和特异性,并进行受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析。

结果

整个队列包括3530例入院患者(确诊/疑似IPA = 66例,无IPA = 3464例),亚组包括127例入院患者(确诊/疑似IPA = 38例,无IPA = 89例)。BAL GM(光密度指数[ODI]≥1.0:86%[24/28])的敏感性显著高于血清GM(ODI≥0.5:38%[39/102])(χ2 = 19.83,P < 0.001)、血清BDG(≥70 pg/mL:33%[31/95])(χ2 = 24.65,P < 0.001)和真菌培养(33%[84/253])(χ2 = 29.38,P < 0.001)。BAL GM(ODI≥1.0)、血清GM(ODI≥0.5)、BDG(89%[1878/2106])和培养(98%[4936/5055])的特异性各不相同。痰GM(ODI≥2.0)的敏感性(84%[32/38])(Fisher精确检验P = 1.000)与BAL GM(ODI≥1.0)相似,特异性(87%[77/89])略低于BAL GM(χ2 = 5.52,P = 0.019)。痰GM(0.883[0.812 - 0.953])和BAL GM(0.901[0.824 - 0.977])的ROC曲线下面积值相当(P = 0.734)。痰LFD的特异性(91%[81/89])(χ2 = 0.89,P = 0.345)与BAL GM(ODI≥1.0)相似,敏感性(63%[24/38])低于BAL GM(χ2 = 4.14,P = 0.042),但显著高于血清GM(ODI≥0.5)(χ2 = 6.95,P = 0.008)、BDG(χ2 = 10.43,P = 0.001)和真菌培养(χ2 = 12.70,P < 0.001)。

结论

血清GM、血清BDG和真菌培养对诊断呼吸系统患者的IPA缺乏足够的敏感性。痰GM和LFD检测有望成为BAL GM检测的快速、敏感且非侵入性的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases.现有检测方法与新型非侵入性检测方法在呼吸道疾病患者侵袭性曲霉病检测中的应用比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Jul 25;135(13):1545-54. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050.
2
Performance of galactomannan, beta-d-glucan, Aspergillus lateral-flow device, conventional culture, and PCR tests with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.用支气管肺泡灌洗液进行半乳甘露聚糖、β - D - 葡聚糖、曲霉侧流装置、传统培养及PCR检测诊断侵袭性肺曲霉病的性能
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jun;52(6):2039-45. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00467-14. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
3
Comparison of 1,3-β-d-glucan with galactomannan in serum and bronchoalveolar fluid for the detection of Aspergillus species in immunosuppressed mechanical ventilated critically ill patients.在免疫抑制的机械通气重症患者中,比较血清和支气管肺泡灌洗液中1,3-β-D-葡聚糖与半乳甘露聚糖用于检测曲霉菌种的情况。
J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:259-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.026. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
4
Detection of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in haematological malignancy patients by using lateral-flow technology.采用侧流技术检测血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的侵袭性肺曲霉病。
J Vis Exp. 2012 Mar 22(61):3721. doi: 10.3791/3721.
5
Comparative evaluation of galactomannan test with bronchoalveolar lavage and serum for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematological malignancies.半乳甘露聚糖检测与支气管肺泡灌洗及血清在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性曲霉病诊断中的比较评估
J Lab Physicians. 2017 Oct-Dec;9(4):234-238. doi: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_127_16.
6
[Evaluation of risk factors for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and detection of diagnostic values of galactomannan and PCR methods in bronchoalveolar lavage samples from non-neutropenic intensive care unit patients].[非中性粒细胞减少的重症监护病房患者侵袭性肺曲霉病危险因素评估及支气管肺泡灌洗样本中半乳甘露聚糖和PCR方法诊断价值的检测]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2015 Oct;49(4):565-75. doi: 10.5578/mb.9906.
7
Aspergillus-Specific Lateral-Flow Device and Real-Time PCR Testing of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid: a Combination Biomarker Approach for Clinical Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis.曲霉特异性侧向流动装置及支气管肺泡灌洗液的实时聚合酶链反应检测:一种用于侵袭性肺曲霉病临床诊断的联合生物标志物方法
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2103-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00110-15. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
8
Testing the performance of a prototype lateral flow device using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in high-risk patients.使用支气管肺泡灌洗液检测原型侧向流设备在高危患者侵袭性肺曲霉病诊断中的性能。
Mycoses. 2018 Jan;61(1):4-10. doi: 10.1111/myc.12694. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
9
Comparison of Serum Galactomannan and 1,3-Beta-D-Glucan Determination for Early Detection of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Critically Ill Patients with Hematological Malignancies and Septic Shock.血清半乳甘露聚糖和1,3-β-D-葡聚糖检测用于早期诊断血液系统恶性肿瘤合并感染性休克重症患者侵袭性肺曲霉病的比较
Mycopathologia. 2016 Aug;181(7-8):505-11. doi: 10.1007/s11046-016-0011-x. Epub 2016 May 3.
10
Multicenter evaluation of a lateral-flow device test for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in ICU patients.用于诊断重症监护病房患者侵袭性肺曲霉病的侧向流动装置检测的多中心评估
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 17;19(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0905-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Lateral-flow device for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.用于诊断侵袭性曲霉病的侧向流动装置:系统评价与诊断性荟萃分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10769-x.
2
Influence of Fungal Colonization on Exacerbations in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.真菌定植对囊性纤维化患者病情加重的影响。
J Fungi (Basel). 2024 Dec 17;10(12):875. doi: 10.3390/jof10120875.
3
Distribution of species and risk factors for aspergillosis in mainland China: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis Among Intubated Patients With COVID-19: A Prospective Study.COVID-19 气管插管患者侵袭性肺曲霉病的流行病学:一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e3606-e3614. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1065.
2
(1→3)-β-D-glucan testing for the detection of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised or critically ill people.(1→3)-β-D-葡聚糖检测用于免疫功能低下或危重症患者侵袭性真菌感染的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 21;7(7):CD009833. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009833.pub2.
3
Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium.
中国大陆曲霉病的物种分布及危险因素:一项系统综述
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 4;11:20499361241252537. doi: 10.1177/20499361241252537. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Microbiological Non-Culture-Based Methods for Diagnosing Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in ICU Patients.用于诊断重症监护病房患者侵袭性肺曲霉病的非基于培养的微生物学方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;13(16):2718. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13162718.
5
Implementation of Lateral Flow Assays for the Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis in European Hospitals: A Survey from Belgium and a Literature Review of Test Performances in Different Patient Populations.欧洲医院中用于诊断侵袭性曲霉病的侧向流动分析方法的实施:来自比利时的一项调查及不同患者群体检测性能的文献综述
Mycopathologia. 2023 Oct;188(5):655-665. doi: 10.1007/s11046-023-00739-9. Epub 2023 May 20.
侵袭性真菌病的共识定义修订与更新:来自欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织和真菌病研究组教育与研究联合会。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1367-1376. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1008.
4
Gliotoxin and bis(methylthio)gliotoxin are not reliable as biomarkers of invasive aspergillosis.曲霉菌烯酮和双(甲基硫代)曲霉菌烯酮不能作为侵袭性曲霉菌病的可靠生物标志物。
Mycoses. 2019 Oct;62(10):945-948. doi: 10.1111/myc.12967. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
Galactomannan detection in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients.免疫功能低下患者侵袭性曲霉病支气管肺泡灌洗中半乳甘露聚糖的检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;5(5):CD012399. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012399.pub2.
6
Prevalence and diversity of filamentous fungi in the airways of cystic fibrosis patients - A Dutch, multicentre study.囊性纤维化患者气道中丝状真菌的流行情况和多样性-一项荷兰多中心研究。
J Cyst Fibros. 2019 Mar;18(2):221-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
7
Invasive aspergillosis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe influenza: a retrospective cohort study.重症监护病房中因严重流感入院的患者侵袭性曲霉菌病:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Oct;6(10):782-792. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30274-1. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
8
Sputum signatures for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with underlying respiratory diseases (SPARED): study protocol for a prospective diagnostic trial.潜在呼吸疾病患者侵袭性肺曲霉病的痰液特征(SPARED):前瞻性诊断试验研究方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 11;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3180-z.
9
Prospective evaluation of a combination of fungal biomarkers for the diagnosis of invasive fungal disease in high-risk haematology patients.前瞻性评估真菌生物标志物联合检测在高危血液病患者侵袭性真菌感染诊断中的应用。
Mycoses. 2018 Sep;61(9):623-632. doi: 10.1111/myc.12773. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review.医学中诊断不确定性的定义和测量:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jan;33(1):103-115. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4164-1. Epub 2017 Sep 21.