Xiao Wei, Du Longyi, Cai Linli, Miao Tiwei, Mao Bing, Wen Fuqiang, Gibson Peter Gerard, Gong Deying, Zeng Yan, Kang Mei, Du Xinmiao, Qu Junyan, Wang Yan, Liu Xuemei, Feng Ruizhi, Fu Juanjuan
Respiratory Group, Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Divison of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610093, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Jul 25;135(13):1545-54. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050.
Although existing mycological tests (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] galactomannan [GM], serum GM, serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan [BDG], and fungal culture) are widely used for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in non-hematological patients with respiratory diseases, their clinical utility in this large population is actually unclear. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and utility of existing tests and explore the efficacy of novel sputum-based Aspergillus assays.
Existing tests were assessed in a prospective and consecutive cohort of patients with respiratory diseases in West China Hospital between 2016 and 2019 while novel sputum assays (especially sputum GM and Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device [LFD]) in a case-controlled subcohort. IPA was defined according to the modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were computed for each test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed.
The entire cohort included 3530 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 66, no IPA = 3464) and the subcohort included 127 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 38, no IPA = 89). Sensitivity of BAL GM (≥1.0 optical density index [ODI]: 86% [24/28]) was substantially higher than that of serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 38% [39/102]) ( χ2 = 19.83, P < 0.001), serum BDG (≥70 pg/mL: 33% [31/95]) ( χ2 = 24.65, P < 0.001), and fungal culture (33% [84/253]) ( χ2 = 29.38, P < 0.001). Specificity varied between BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI: 94% [377/402]), serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 95% [2130/2248]), BDG (89% [1878/2106]), and culture (98% [4936/5055]). Sputum GM (≥2.0 ODI) had similar sensitivity (84% [32/38]) (Fisher's exact P = 1.000) to and slightly lower specificity (87% [77/89]) ( χ2 = 5.52, P = 0.019) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI). Area under the ROC curve values were comparable between sputum GM (0.883 [0.812-0.953]) and BAL GM (0.901 [0.824-0.977]) ( P = 0.734). Sputum LFD had similar specificity (91% [81/89]) ( χ2 = 0.89, P = 0.345) to and lower sensitivity (63% [24/38]) ( χ2 = 4.14, P = 0.042) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI), but significantly higher sensitivity than serum GM (≥0.5 ODI) ( χ2 = 6.95, P = 0.008), BDG ( χ2 = 10.43, P = 0.001), and fungal culture ( χ2 = 12.70, P < 0.001).
Serum GM, serum BDG, and fungal culture lack sufficient sensitivity for diagnosing IPA in respiratory patients. Sputum GM and LFD assays hold promise as rapid, sensitive, and non-invasive alternatives to the BAL GM test.
尽管现有的真菌学检测(支气管肺泡灌洗术[BAL]半乳甘露聚糖[GM]、血清GM、血清(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖[BDG]和真菌培养)广泛用于诊断非血液系统呼吸系统疾病患者的侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA),但其在这一庞大人群中的临床实用性实际上尚不清楚。我们旨在通过评估现有检测的诊断准确性和实用性来解决这一临床不确定性,并探索新型痰基曲霉检测方法的有效性。
2016年至2019年期间,在华西医院对一组前瞻性连续呼吸系统疾病患者进行现有检测评估,同时在一个病例对照亚组中评估新型痰检测方法(尤其是痰GM和曲霉特异性侧向流动装置[LFD])。IPA根据改良的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/真菌病研究组标准进行定义。计算每项检测的敏感性和特异性,并进行受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析。
整个队列包括3530例入院患者(确诊/疑似IPA = 66例,无IPA = 3464例),亚组包括127例入院患者(确诊/疑似IPA = 38例,无IPA = 89例)。BAL GM(光密度指数[ODI]≥1.0:86%[24/28])的敏感性显著高于血清GM(ODI≥0.5:38%[39/102])(χ2 = 19.83,P < 0.001)、血清BDG(≥70 pg/mL:33%[31/95])(χ2 = 24.65,P < 0.001)和真菌培养(33%[84/253])(χ2 = 29.38,P < 0.001)。BAL GM(ODI≥1.0)、血清GM(ODI≥0.5)、BDG(89%[1878/2106])和培养(98%[4936/5055])的特异性各不相同。痰GM(ODI≥2.0)的敏感性(84%[32/38])(Fisher精确检验P = 1.000)与BAL GM(ODI≥1.0)相似,特异性(87%[77/89])略低于BAL GM(χ2 = 5.52,P = 0.019)。痰GM(0.883[0.812 - 0.953])和BAL GM(0.901[0.824 - 0.977])的ROC曲线下面积值相当(P = 0.734)。痰LFD的特异性(91%[81/89])(χ2 = 0.89,P = 0.345)与BAL GM(ODI≥1.0)相似,敏感性(63%[24/38])低于BAL GM(χ2 = 4.14,P = 0.042),但显著高于血清GM(ODI≥0.5)(χ2 = 6.95,P = 0.008)、BDG(χ2 = 10.43,P = 0.001)和真菌培养(χ2 = 12.70,P < 0.001)。
血清GM、血清BDG和真菌培养对诊断呼吸系统患者的IPA缺乏足够的敏感性。痰GM和LFD检测有望成为BAL GM检测的快速、敏感且非侵入性的替代方法。