Van Cauwenberghe Linde, Van Kemseke Saskia, Oudaert Ellen, Pauwels Sofie, Steurbaut Stephane, Van Laere Sven, Hubloue Ives
Centre for Pharmaceutical Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Emergency Department, University Hospital Brussels (UZ Brussel).
Eur J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 1;30(1):7-14. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000961. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
The emergency department (ED) is a high-risk setting for the occurrence of medication discrepancies (MDs) due to inconsistencies between real and documented chronic medication therapies. A clinical pharmacist (CP) improves medication safety by performing a structured medication reconciliation on ED admission. The main objective was to identify the frequency and type of MDs in the chronic medication therapy by comparing the medication displayed in the home medication module of the electronic medical record and in the genereal practitioner's (GP) referral letter with the best possible medication history by performing a structured medication reconciliation on ED admission. This prospective, monocentric, interventional study was carried out in the ED of a tertiary care university hospital in Brussels, Belgium. Inclusion criteria were patients of at least 65 years, polypharmacy, ED admission between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. on weekdays, hospitalization and signed informed consent. During 24 days, a CP performed a structured medication reconciliation in order to obtain the best possible medication history and registered all MDs. The CP compared the best possible medication history with the home medication module and the GP's referral letter and registered the different types of MDs. Eighty-three patients were included. The median number of medications in the home medication module and the best possible medication history was significantly different {7.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 5.0-11.0] vs. 8.0 (IQR, 6.0-11.0)/patient; P < 0.0001} with a median of 5.0 (IQR, 3.0-8.0) MDs per patient. Main MDs were omission (38.8%), addition (18.4%) and a deviant administration time (15.2%). Only 22.9% of patients ( N = 19) had a GP's referral letter containing their chronic medication therapy. The median number of medications in the GP's referral letter and the best possible medication history were significantly different [6.0 (IQR, 4.0-9.0) vs. 8.0 (IQR, 7.0-11.0)/patient; P < 0.0001] with a median of 6.0 (IQR, 5.0-11.0) MDs per patient. Main MDs were omissions (39.9%), deviant frequencies (35.3%) and doses (16.7%). A CP, integrated in a multidisciplinary ED team, enhances medication safety by intercepting MDs on ED admission. Few patients possess a GP's referral letter containing their chronic medication therapy and when they do, the accuracy and completeness are poor.
由于实际慢性药物治疗与记录的治疗情况不一致,急诊科(ED)是发生用药差异(MDs)的高风险场所。临床药师(CP)通过在急诊科入院时进行结构化用药核对来提高用药安全性。主要目的是通过在急诊科入院时进行结构化用药核对,将电子病历家庭用药模块和全科医生(GP)转诊信中显示的用药情况与尽可能完善的用药史进行比较,以确定慢性药物治疗中MDs的频率和类型。这项前瞻性、单中心、干预性研究在比利时布鲁塞尔一家三级护理大学医院的急诊科进行。纳入标准为年龄至少65岁、使用多种药物、工作日上午8点至下午4点之间急诊科入院、住院且签署知情同意书。在24天内,一名临床药师进行了结构化用药核对,以获取尽可能完善的用药史,并记录所有MDs。临床药师将尽可能完善的用药史与家庭用药模块和全科医生的转诊信进行比较,并记录不同类型的MDs。共纳入83例患者。家庭用药模块中的用药中位数与尽可能完善的用药史有显著差异{7.0[四分位数间距(IQR),5.0 - 11.0]对8.0(IQR,6.0 - 11.0)/患者;P < 0.0001},每位患者的MDs中位数为5.0(IQR,3.0 - 8.0)。主要的MDs为遗漏(38.8%)、添加(18.4%)和给药时间偏差(15.2%)。只有22.9%的患者(N = 19)有包含其慢性药物治疗的全科医生转诊信。全科医生转诊信中的用药中位数与尽可能完善的用药史有显著差异[6.0(IQR,4.0 - 9.0)对8.0(IQR,7.0 - 11.0)/患者;P < 0.0001],每位患者的MDs中位数为6.0(IQR,5.0 - 11.0)。主要的MDs为遗漏(39.9%)、频率偏差(35.3%)和剂量偏差(16.7%)。融入多学科急诊科团队的临床药师通过在急诊科入院时拦截MDs来提高用药安全性。很少有患者拥有包含其慢性药物治疗的全科医生转诊信,即便有,其准确性和完整性也很差。