Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences.
Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Nov;151(11):2893-2909. doi: 10.1037/xge0001221. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
We ask whether moral judgment in preschool children observes a "means principle." It is well established that young children consider both the consequences and the goals of actions when making moral judgments; much less studied is the question of whether the used to attain a given goal also matter. By obtaining preschoolers' judgments regarding when, if ever, it is permissible for 1 person to harm another as a means, we show, across 2 experiments, that children ( = 200 across 2 studies; = 5.1 yrs.) use the in their moral judgments. Subjects recognized not only when a harm was being used as a means but also situated that means appropriately with respect to the correct superordinate goal. In this respect, the preschoolers in this sample are like adults across a wide range of cultures. These findings have important implications for the understanding of moral development: young children can use an agent's means, and not just her goal, to make a moral judgment. We discuss the broader issue of whether, in light of emerging evidence for the means principle, there really are any moral universals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
我们探讨了幼儿的道德判断是否遵循“手段原则”。已有大量研究表明,幼儿在进行道德判断时会同时考虑行为的后果和目的;而较少被研究的问题是,达到给定目标所使用的手段是否也很重要。通过让幼儿对何时可以允许 1 个人作为手段伤害另 1 个人做出判断,我们在两项实验中均表明(两项研究共 200 名被试,平均年龄为 5.1 岁),儿童会在道德判断中使用手段。被试不仅认识到伤害正在被用作手段,而且还将该手段适当地与正确的上位目标联系起来。在这方面,本研究中的幼儿与来自不同文化的成年人相似。这些发现对于理解道德发展具有重要意义:幼儿可以使用行为者的手段,而不仅仅是她的目的,来进行道德判断。鉴于手段原则的新证据,我们讨论了更广泛的问题,即是否真的存在任何道德普遍性。(源自:PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)。