• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达托霉素和左氧氟沙星在模拟血浆和肺内 pH 值下对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的活性。

Activity of Delafloxacin and Levofloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at Simulated Plasma and Intrapulmonary pH Values.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Rockford, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0270521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02705-21. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1128/spectrum.02705-21
PMID:35862943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9431699/
Abstract

Fluoroquinolones have become a popular treatment option for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Although levofloxacin is most commonly used, delafloxacin demonstrates comparable activity when evaluated under standard susceptibility testing conditions at neutral pH. At acidic pH, the activity of the anionic delafloxacin is improved, while the activity of the zwitterionic levofloxacin is reduced. Because the human respiratory tract has a pH of 6.6 and is the most common site of S. maltophilia infection, it is vital to understand the activity of these agents in this environment. Therefore, levofloxacin and delafloxacin were tested against clinical S. maltophilia isolates via broth microdilution testing ( = 37) and time-kill analysis ( = 5) in neutral cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) (pH 7.3) and acidic CAMHB (aCAMHB) (pH 6.5). In CAMHB, MIC values were similar between levofloxacin and delafloxacin (8 mg/L versus 8 mg/L). In aCAMHB, levofloxacin MICs did not change, while delafloxacin MICs decreased by a median of 4 log dilutions (MIC values of 8 mg/L versus 0.25 mg/L). In time-kill analyses, levofloxacin and delafloxacin at the maximum drug concentration for the free drug () were bactericidal against 3 and 2 isolates in CAMHB, respectively. In aCAMHB, levofloxacin was not bactericidal against any isolate, while delafloxacin was bactericidal against the same 2 isolates. Relative to CAMHB, levofloxacin activity was reduced by 2.5 log CFU/mL in aCAMHB, whereas delafloxacin activity was increased 2.7 log CFU/mL. Although the bactericidal activity of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia was attenuated in an acidic environment in this study, the increased potency of delafloxacin at pH 6.5 did not translate into improved bactericidal activity in time-kill analyses, compared to pH 7.3. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia most often infects the lungs, where the physiologic environment is naturally slightly acidic (pH ~6.6), compared to most parts of the body (such as the bloodstream), which have neutral pH values (7.4). Pneumonia due to S. maltophilia is often treated with the antibiotic levofloxacin, despite the activity of levofloxacin being known to be impaired at acidic pH. Unfortunately, currently available methods for susceptibility testing of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia are performed at a neutral pH and therefore may not accurately represent the activity of levofloxacin at the site of infection in the lungs. A similar but newer antibiotic in the same class as levofloxacin, namely, delafloxacin, is not affected by being in an acidic environment and may actually work better at lower pH values. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether one drug might be better than the other in this setting by testing each agent's ability to kill S. maltophilia at pH 7.3 and pH 6.5. These findings could then be used to design confirmatory studies that may ultimately impact which drug is given to patients with lung infections due to S. maltophilia.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/9431699/69bfd76b82c1/spectrum.02705-21-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/9431699/f0ad510450f8/spectrum.02705-21-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/9431699/69bfd76b82c1/spectrum.02705-21-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/9431699/f0ad510450f8/spectrum.02705-21-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf1f/9431699/69bfd76b82c1/spectrum.02705-21-f002.jpg
摘要

氟喹诺酮类药物已成为治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的常用治疗选择。虽然左氧氟沙星最常被使用,但在中性 pH 值下进行标准药敏试验时,德拉沙星表现出相当的活性。在酸性 pH 值下,阴离子德拉沙星的活性得到改善,而两性离子左氧氟沙星的活性降低。由于人体呼吸道的 pH 值约为 6.6,并且是嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的最常见部位,因此了解这些药物在该环境中的活性至关重要。因此,通过肉汤微量稀释试验( = 37)和时间杀伤分析( = 5),在中性阳离子调整的 Mueller-Hinton 肉汤(CAMHB)(pH 7.3)和酸性 CAMHB(aCAMHB)(pH 6.5)中,测试了左氧氟沙星和德拉沙星对临床嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌分离株的活性。在 CAMHB 中,左氧氟沙星和德拉沙星的 MIC 值相似(8 mg/L 对 8 mg/L)。在 aCAMHB 中,左氧氟沙星的 MIC 值没有变化,而德拉沙星的 MIC 值下降了中位数 4 个对数稀释度(MIC 值为 8 mg/L 对 0.25 mg/L)。在时间杀伤分析中,在游离药物的最大药物浓度下,左氧氟沙星和德拉沙星对 3 株和 2 株在 CAMHB 中的分离株具有杀菌作用。在 aCAMHB 中,左氧氟沙星对任何分离株均无杀菌作用,而德拉沙星对相同的 2 株分离株具有杀菌作用。与 CAMHB 相比,aCAMHB 中左氧氟沙星的活性降低了 2.5 log CFU/mL,而德拉沙星的活性增加了 2.7 log CFU/mL。尽管在这项研究中,左氧氟沙星对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的杀菌活性在酸性环境中受到抑制,但与 pH 值为 7.3 时相比,pH 值为 6.5 时德拉沙星的杀菌活性增强并没有转化为时间杀伤分析中的改善杀菌活性。与身体的大多数部位(如血流)相比,嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌通常感染肺部,肺部的生理环境自然呈轻微酸性(pH 值约为 6.6)。由于嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌引起的肺炎通常用抗生素左氧氟沙星治疗,尽管已知左氧氟沙星在酸性 pH 值下的活性受损。不幸的是,目前用于检测嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌对左氧氟沙星敏感性的方法是在中性 pH 值下进行的,因此可能无法准确反映感染部位肺部的左氧氟沙星活性。一种在同一类别的类似但更新的抗生素,即德拉沙星,不受处于酸性环境的影响,并且在较低的 pH 值下实际上可能效果更好。因此,本研究的目的是通过测试每种药物在 pH 值为 7.3 和 pH 值为 6.5 时杀死嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的能力,来研究一种药物是否优于另一种药物。这些发现可以用于设计验证性研究,这些研究最终可能会影响因嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染而给予患者哪种药物。

相似文献

1
Activity of Delafloxacin and Levofloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at Simulated Plasma and Intrapulmonary pH Values.达托霉素和左氧氟沙星在模拟血浆和肺内 pH 值下对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的活性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0270521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02705-21. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole.潜在替代治疗剂对左氧氟沙星和/或复方磺胺甲噁唑不敏感的嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌分离株的活性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jan 28;58(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01603-19.
3
Time-Kill Studies of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia versus Escherichia coli Using Cation-Adjusted Mueller-Hinton Broth and ISO-Sensitest Broth.使用阳离子调整 Mueller-Hinton 肉汤和 ISO-Sensitest 肉汤对嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌与大肠杆菌进行复方磺胺甲噁唑/甲氧苄啶的时间杀菌研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Mar 15;66(3):e0216721. doi: 10.1128/aac.02167-21. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Levofloxacin Efflux and smeD in Clinical Isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌临床分离株中的左氧氟沙星外排与smeD
Microb Drug Resist. 2017 Mar;23(2):163-168. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2015.0228. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
5
Comparative Activity of Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin and Moxifloxacin against Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Assessed by Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations and Time-Kill Studies.通过最低抑菌浓度和时间-杀菌研究评估环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星对肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的比较活性。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0156690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156690. eCollection 2016.
6
Activity of Cefiderocol Alone and in Combination with Levofloxacin, Minocycline, Polymyxin B, or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole against Multidrug-Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.头孢地尔单独及与左氧氟沙星、米诺环素、多粘菌素B或复方磺胺甲恶唑联合使用对多重耐药嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Aug 20;64(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00559-20.
7
Activity of Delafloxacin and Finafloxacin against Mycoplasma hominis and Species.达氟沙星和萘甲唑啉对支原体和其他种属的活性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0009922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00099-22. Epub 2022 May 9.
8
Activity of delafloxacin versus that of levofloxacin against anaerobic and microaerophilic isolates.达托霉素与左氧氟沙星对厌氧和微需氧分离株的活性。
Anaerobe. 2020 Apr;62:102150. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102150. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
9
Activity of Delafloxacin and Microbiological Response against Fluoroquinolone-Susceptible and Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Two Phase 3 Studies of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.两项急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染 3 期研究中分离的氟喹诺酮敏感和不敏感金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的达托霉素活性和微生物学应答。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00772-17. Print 2017 Sep.
10
and Contribute to Oxidative Stress-Mediated Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.并有助于嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌氧化应激介导的氟喹诺酮耐药性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Apr 19;66(4):e0204321. doi: 10.1128/aac.02043-21. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Combating oral biofilms in Nigerian schoolchildren: a synergistic approach using Macrosphyra longistyla extracts and titanium-ferrite nanoparticles.对抗尼日利亚学童口腔生物膜:使用长茎巨藻提取物和钛铁纳米颗粒的协同方法。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2025 May 20;20:Doc22. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000551. eCollection 2025.
2
Global mapping of antibiotic resistance rates among clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球临床分离嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌耐药率的地图绘制:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Mar 19;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00685-4.
3
Updated Review on Clinically-Relevant Properties of Delafloxacin.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical challenges treating infections: an update.感染治疗中的临床挑战:最新进展
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 May 5;4(3):dlac040. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac040. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Overcoming Resistance for a More Rational Therapeutic Approach.克服耐药性以实现更合理的治疗方法。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 21;9(5):ofac095. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac095. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals.
关于德拉氟沙星临床相关特性的最新综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jul 28;12(8):1241. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081241.
甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与左氧氟沙星治疗感染的比较:一项对美国154家医院电子健康记录的回顾性疗效研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 17;9(2):ofab644. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab644. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections.美国传染病学会关于治疗产 AmpC β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科、耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 6;74(12):2089-2114. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1013.
5
Levofloxacin pharmacodynamics against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model: implications for susceptibility breakpoint revision.左氧氟沙星对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌在中性粒细胞减少症小鼠大腿感染模型中的药效学:对药敏折点修订的意义。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Dec 24;77(1):164-168. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab344.
6
Discrepancy in sustained efficacy and resistance emergence under human-simulated exposure of cefiderocol against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia between in vitro chemostat and in vivo murine infection models.在体外恒化器和体内感染小鼠模型中,人类模拟暴露于头孢地尔对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的持续疗效和耐药性出现差异。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Sep 15;76(10):2615-2621. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab221.
7
Clinical outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, minocycline, or fluoroquinolone monotherapy.单用复方新诺明、米诺环素或氟喹诺酮治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的临床疗效。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Aug;58(2):106367. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106367. Epub 2021 May 28.
8
Evaluation of the Vitek 2, Phoenix, and MicroScan for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.评价 Vitek 2、Phoenix 和 MicroScan 对嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌的抗菌药物敏感性测试。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Aug 18;59(9):e0065421. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00654-21.
9
Airway Surface Liquid pH Regulation in Airway Epithelium Current Understandings and Gaps in Knowledge.气道上皮中气道表面液体 pH 值的调节:当前的认识和知识缺口。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 25;22(7):3384. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073384.
10
Effect of antimicrobials on biofilm.抗菌剂对生物膜的影响。
Future Microbiol. 2021 Jan;16(2):83-93. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2020-0115. Epub 2021 Jan 20.