College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Rockford, Illinois, USA.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0270521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02705-21. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
Fluoroquinolones have become a popular treatment option for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Although levofloxacin is most commonly used, delafloxacin demonstrates comparable activity when evaluated under standard susceptibility testing conditions at neutral pH. At acidic pH, the activity of the anionic delafloxacin is improved, while the activity of the zwitterionic levofloxacin is reduced. Because the human respiratory tract has a pH of 6.6 and is the most common site of S. maltophilia infection, it is vital to understand the activity of these agents in this environment. Therefore, levofloxacin and delafloxacin were tested against clinical S. maltophilia isolates via broth microdilution testing ( = 37) and time-kill analysis ( = 5) in neutral cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) (pH 7.3) and acidic CAMHB (aCAMHB) (pH 6.5). In CAMHB, MIC values were similar between levofloxacin and delafloxacin (8 mg/L versus 8 mg/L). In aCAMHB, levofloxacin MICs did not change, while delafloxacin MICs decreased by a median of 4 log dilutions (MIC values of 8 mg/L versus 0.25 mg/L). In time-kill analyses, levofloxacin and delafloxacin at the maximum drug concentration for the free drug () were bactericidal against 3 and 2 isolates in CAMHB, respectively. In aCAMHB, levofloxacin was not bactericidal against any isolate, while delafloxacin was bactericidal against the same 2 isolates. Relative to CAMHB, levofloxacin activity was reduced by 2.5 log CFU/mL in aCAMHB, whereas delafloxacin activity was increased 2.7 log CFU/mL. Although the bactericidal activity of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia was attenuated in an acidic environment in this study, the increased potency of delafloxacin at pH 6.5 did not translate into improved bactericidal activity in time-kill analyses, compared to pH 7.3. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia most often infects the lungs, where the physiologic environment is naturally slightly acidic (pH ~6.6), compared to most parts of the body (such as the bloodstream), which have neutral pH values (7.4). Pneumonia due to S. maltophilia is often treated with the antibiotic levofloxacin, despite the activity of levofloxacin being known to be impaired at acidic pH. Unfortunately, currently available methods for susceptibility testing of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia are performed at a neutral pH and therefore may not accurately represent the activity of levofloxacin at the site of infection in the lungs. A similar but newer antibiotic in the same class as levofloxacin, namely, delafloxacin, is not affected by being in an acidic environment and may actually work better at lower pH values. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether one drug might be better than the other in this setting by testing each agent's ability to kill S. maltophilia at pH 7.3 and pH 6.5. These findings could then be used to design confirmatory studies that may ultimately impact which drug is given to patients with lung infections due to S. maltophilia.
氟喹诺酮类药物已成为治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的常用治疗选择。虽然左氧氟沙星最常被使用,但在中性 pH 值下进行标准药敏试验时,德拉沙星表现出相当的活性。在酸性 pH 值下,阴离子德拉沙星的活性得到改善,而两性离子左氧氟沙星的活性降低。由于人体呼吸道的 pH 值约为 6.6,并且是嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的最常见部位,因此了解这些药物在该环境中的活性至关重要。因此,通过肉汤微量稀释试验( = 37)和时间杀伤分析( = 5),在中性阳离子调整的 Mueller-Hinton 肉汤(CAMHB)(pH 7.3)和酸性 CAMHB(aCAMHB)(pH 6.5)中,测试了左氧氟沙星和德拉沙星对临床嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌分离株的活性。在 CAMHB 中,左氧氟沙星和德拉沙星的 MIC 值相似(8 mg/L 对 8 mg/L)。在 aCAMHB 中,左氧氟沙星的 MIC 值没有变化,而德拉沙星的 MIC 值下降了中位数 4 个对数稀释度(MIC 值为 8 mg/L 对 0.25 mg/L)。在时间杀伤分析中,在游离药物的最大药物浓度下,左氧氟沙星和德拉沙星对 3 株和 2 株在 CAMHB 中的分离株具有杀菌作用。在 aCAMHB 中,左氧氟沙星对任何分离株均无杀菌作用,而德拉沙星对相同的 2 株分离株具有杀菌作用。与 CAMHB 相比,aCAMHB 中左氧氟沙星的活性降低了 2.5 log CFU/mL,而德拉沙星的活性增加了 2.7 log CFU/mL。尽管在这项研究中,左氧氟沙星对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的杀菌活性在酸性环境中受到抑制,但与 pH 值为 7.3 时相比,pH 值为 6.5 时德拉沙星的杀菌活性增强并没有转化为时间杀伤分析中的改善杀菌活性。与身体的大多数部位(如血流)相比,嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌通常感染肺部,肺部的生理环境自然呈轻微酸性(pH 值约为 6.6)。由于嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌引起的肺炎通常用抗生素左氧氟沙星治疗,尽管已知左氧氟沙星在酸性 pH 值下的活性受损。不幸的是,目前用于检测嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌对左氧氟沙星敏感性的方法是在中性 pH 值下进行的,因此可能无法准确反映感染部位肺部的左氧氟沙星活性。一种在同一类别的类似但更新的抗生素,即德拉沙星,不受处于酸性环境的影响,并且在较低的 pH 值下实际上可能效果更好。因此,本研究的目的是通过测试每种药物在 pH 值为 7.3 和 pH 值为 6.5 时杀死嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的能力,来研究一种药物是否优于另一种药物。这些发现可以用于设计验证性研究,这些研究最终可能会影响因嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染而给予患者哪种药物。