Suppr超能文献

用于填埋处置或用作水泥替代品的垃圾焚烧发电(WTE)飞灰的稳定化处理。

Stabilization of Waste-to-Energy (WTE) fly ash for disposal in landfills or use as cement substitute.

作者信息

Tian Yixi, Themelis Nickolas J, Zhao Diandian, Thanos Bourtsalas A C, Kawashima Shiho

机构信息

Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2022 Aug 1;150:227-243. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.06.043. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

Abstract

This study investigated two approaches for managing Waste-to-Energy (WTE) fly ash (FA): (i) phosphoric acid stabilization of FA and disposal in non-hazardous landfills, so that it can pass the U.S. TCLP procedure and meet the U.S. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) standards; (ii) use of FA or phosphoric acid stabilized fly ash (PFA) as cement substitute in construction for avoiding disposal in landfills and reducing the consumption of Portland cement. The effect of stabilization was identified by TCLP tests and XRD quantification (QXRD), which showed that the economically optimal concentration for PFA to pass the RCRA was 1 mol/L HPO (equivalent to 0.4 mol of HPO/kg of FA). Zn/Pb-phosphates were formed in treated ash by using high concentration HPO (e.g., 3 mol/L). Thus, the hazardous FA was chemically stabilized to PFA, that were both discussed as cement substitute. QXRD and SEM results showed that both FA and PFA (1 mol/L HPO) chemically reacted with cement and water. Up to 25 vol% of the cement can be replaced by FA or PFA, with similar mechanical performance of cement mortars than that of reference. Testing by LEAF Method 1313-pH dependence showed that the FA and PFA cement mortars exhibited the same leachability of heavy metals; therefore, this study demonstrated the technical feasibility of utilizing either raw FA or stabilized PFA as supplementary cementitious material. The leachability of heavy metals in optimal FA or PFA 25 vol% cement mortar was under the U.K. WAC non-hazardous limits.

摘要

本研究探讨了两种处理垃圾焚烧飞灰(FA)的方法:(i)用磷酸对飞灰进行稳定化处理并处置于非危险垃圾填埋场,使其能够通过美国毒性特征浸出程序(TCLP)并符合美国《资源保护与回收法》(RCRA)标准;(ii)在建筑中使用飞灰或磷酸稳定化飞灰(PFA)作为水泥替代品,以避免其进入垃圾填埋场并减少波特兰水泥的消耗。通过TCLP测试和X射线衍射定量分析(QXRD)确定了稳定化处理的效果,结果表明,PFA通过RCRA标准的经济最优浓度为1mol/L H₃PO₄(相当于0.4mol H₃PO₄/kg飞灰)。使用高浓度H₃PO₄(如3mol/L)处理后的飞灰中形成了锌/铅磷酸盐。因此,危险的飞灰被化学稳定化为PFA,二者均被讨论作为水泥替代品。QXRD和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)结果表明,飞灰和PFA(1mol/L H₃PO₄)均与水泥和水发生化学反应。高达25体积%的水泥可用飞灰或PFA替代,水泥砂浆的力学性能与参考样品相似。采用LEAF方法1313 - pH依赖性测试表明,飞灰和PFA水泥砂浆的重金属浸出性相同;因此,本研究证明了使用原始飞灰或稳定化PFA作为辅助胶凝材料的技术可行性。最优飞灰或PFA 25体积%水泥砂浆中重金属的浸出性低于英国废物接受准则(WAC)的非危险限值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验