• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表面活性剂强化空气注入(SEAS)技术对低渗透挥发性有机化合物污染土壤的修复特性。

Remediation characteristics of surfactant-enhanced air sparging (SEAS) technology on volatile organic compounds contaminated soil with low permeability.

机构信息

School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China.

School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China.

出版信息

J Contam Hydrol. 2022 Oct;250:104049. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104049. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104049
PMID:35863213
Abstract

Surfactant-enhanced air sparging (SEAS) is an effective technology for the remediation of volatile organic compounds contamination of medium and high-permeability soil, though applying SEAS to low-permeability soil contamination has rarely been explored. In this study, a series of two-dimensional physical model tests were designed to explore the feasibility and remediation characteristics of SEAS on low-permeability soil. In the test results, the incorporation and increase in surfactant concentration promoted air channel formation in the low-permeability soil, finally reduced the capillary breakthrough pressure and improved the airflow rate. The majority of the exhausted gaseous contaminants were distributed along the horizontal direction, differing from the results observed in medium and high-permeability soils. The exhausted gaseous contaminant concentration changed slightly when the sparging pressure and surfactant concentration increased at relatively low levels and increased as the sparging pressure and surfactant concentration increased further. Increasing the air sparging pressure without surfactant incorporation or with a low surfactant concentration cannot effectively remove the contaminant, while the removal efficiency can be enhanced with further increases in surfactant concentration. The discrete remediation characteristics had been confirmed during SEAS application on low-permeability soil, then the relationships between the ratios of remediation area and remediation extent under different surfactant concentrations and sparging pressures were established for remediation efficiency evaluation. Using this method, the discrete remediation characteristics can be recreated once the surfactant concentration and the sparging pressure were chosen. On the other side, targeted improvements in the remediation area or extent can be achieved by controlling the surfactant concentration and sparging pressure. Through this study, SEAS technology and the proposed evaluation method were successfully implemented in soil with hydraulic conductivity around 9E-7 m/s, which expanded the application scope of SEAS technology for contaminant removal.

摘要

表面活性剂强化空气吹脱(SEAS)是一种修复中高渗透性土壤中挥发性有机化合物污染的有效技术,但很少有人探索将 SEAS 应用于低渗透性土壤污染。本研究设计了一系列二维物理模型试验,以探讨 SEAS 对低渗透性土壤的可行性和修复特性。在试验结果中,表面活性剂浓度的增加促进了低渗透性土壤中空气通道的形成,最终降低了毛细突破压力,提高了气流速率。大部分耗尽的气态污染物沿水平方向分布,与中高渗透性土壤中的结果不同。在相对较低的注气压力和表面活性剂浓度下,当注气压力和表面活性剂浓度增加时,耗尽的气态污染物浓度变化不大,进一步增加时会增加。不添加表面活性剂或表面活性剂浓度较低时增加空气注入压力并不能有效地去除污染物,而进一步增加表面活性剂浓度可以提高去除效率。在低渗透性土壤上应用 SEAS 时已经确认了离散修复特性,然后建立了不同表面活性剂浓度和注气压力下修复面积与修复程度之比与修复效率评价之间的关系。使用这种方法,一旦选择了表面活性剂浓度和注气压力,就可以再现离散修复特性。另一方面,可以通过控制表面活性剂浓度和注气压力来实现对修复面积或程度的有针对性的改善。通过这项研究,成功地将 SEAS 技术和提出的评价方法应用于水力传导率约为 9E-7 m/s 的土壤中,扩大了 SEAS 技术用于去除污染物的应用范围。

相似文献

1
Remediation characteristics of surfactant-enhanced air sparging (SEAS) technology on volatile organic compounds contaminated soil with low permeability.表面活性剂强化空气注入(SEAS)技术对低渗透挥发性有机化合物污染土壤的修复特性。
J Contam Hydrol. 2022 Oct;250:104049. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104049. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Air sparging remediation of VOCs contaminated low-permeability soil based on pressure gradient control.基于压力梯度控制的空气注入修复技术在处理低渗透性土壤中的挥发性有机污染物。
Chemosphere. 2023 Oct;339:139650. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139650. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
3
Mass transfer enhancement of air sparging on VOCs contaminated low-permeability soil by establishing pressure gradient.通过建立压力梯度增强空气注射对挥发性有机化合物污染的低渗透土壤的传质效果。
Chemosphere. 2023 Feb;313:137416. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137416. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
4
Effects of surfactant injection position on the airflow pattern and contaminant removal efficiency of surfactant-enhanced air sparging.表面活性剂注入位置对表面活性剂强化空气喷射气流模式和污染物去除效率的影响。
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Jan 15;402:123564. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123564. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
5
Remediation of nonaqueous phase liquid polluted sites using surfactant-enhanced air sparging and soil vapor extraction.使用表面活性剂强化空气注入和土壤蒸气提取技术修复受非水相液体污染的场地。
Water Environ Res. 2013 Feb;85(2):133-40. doi: 10.2175/106143012x13560205144173.
6
Mechanisms of surfactant-enhanced air sparging in different media.表面活性剂强化空气喷射在不同介质中的机理。
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2013;48(9):1047-55. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2013.773809.
7
Removal of NAPL from columns by oxidation, sparging, surfactant and thermal treatment.通过氧化、鼓泡、添加表面活性剂和热处理从柱中去除NAPL。
Chemosphere. 2017 Dec;188:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.163. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Effects of airflow rate distribution and nitrobenzene removal in an aquifer with a low-permeability lens during surfactant-enhanced air sparging.在低渗透性透镜含水层中,通过表面活性剂强化空气喷射去除硝基苯时,气流速率分布的影响。
J Hazard Mater. 2022 Sep 5;437:129383. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129383. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
9
Effect of increased groundwater viscosity on the remedial performance of surfactant-enhanced air sparging.地下水黏度增加对表面活性剂强化空气注入修复性能的影响。
J Contam Hydrol. 2018 Mar;210:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
10
Surfactant-enhanced ozone sparging for removal of organic compounds from sand.表面活性剂强化臭氧气提去除砂中的有机化合物。
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2013;48(5):526-33. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2013.730438.