• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过氧化、鼓泡、添加表面活性剂和热处理从柱中去除NAPL。

Removal of NAPL from columns by oxidation, sparging, surfactant and thermal treatment.

作者信息

Jousse F, Atteia O, Höhener P, Cohen G

机构信息

Fondation Innovasol, 1 Allee Daguin, 33607, Pessac, France.

Fondation Innovasol, 1 Allee Daguin, 33607, Pessac, France; ENSEGID - EA 4592 Géoressources et Environnement, Institut Carnot Isifor, 1 Allee Daguin, 33607, Pessac, France.

出版信息

Chemosphere. 2017 Dec;188:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.163. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.163
PMID:28886552
Abstract

In this paper, four treatment techniques commonly applied to Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) removal from soil are compared in column experiments with pure sand containing a residual Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (L-NAPL) contamination. Oxidation is tested through the injection of Fenton reagent, with persulfate, and combined with sparging with the injection of ozone. Surfactant treatment was conducted at low flow rates with Tween80. Sparging was conducted by air injection but at a low flow rate of 1 mL min. Finally several columns were thermally treated at a temperature of 80 °C. The results showed high removal (>90%) for all techniques used, although only thermal treatment on BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes) reached 100% efficiency. The main limiting factors of each technique were: (i) for oxidation, the solubility of the substance limited the removal; (ii) for surfactant both the solubility in the surfactant and the type of surfactant are important; (iii) for sparging, the main factors are contaminant vapor pressure and porous media grain size; (iv) for thermal treatment, the limitation arises from the contaminant vapor pressure and the medium hydraulic conductivity. A comparison with literature data shows that the results are consistent with most of the studies conducted on one technique.

摘要

在本文中,通过柱实验对常用于去除土壤中挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的四种处理技术进行了比较,实验采用含有残留轻质非水相液体(L-NAPL)污染物的纯砂。通过注入芬顿试剂、过硫酸盐并结合注入臭氧进行曝气来测试氧化效果。使用吐温80以低流速进行表面活性剂处理。通过注入空气进行曝气,但流速为1 mL/min。最后,对几根柱子在80℃的温度下进行热处理。结果表明,所使用的所有技术去除率都很高(>90%),尽管只有对BTEX(苯、甲苯、乙苯和二甲苯)的热处理达到了100%的效率。每种技术的主要限制因素如下:(i)对于氧化,物质的溶解度限制了去除效果;(ii)对于表面活性剂,在表面活性剂中的溶解度和表面活性剂类型都很重要;(iii)对于曝气,主要因素是污染物蒸气压和多孔介质颗粒大小;(iv)对于热处理,限制因素来自污染物蒸气压和介质水力传导率。与文献数据的比较表明,结果与针对一种技术进行的大多数研究一致。

相似文献

1
Removal of NAPL from columns by oxidation, sparging, surfactant and thermal treatment.通过氧化、鼓泡、添加表面活性剂和热处理从柱中去除NAPL。
Chemosphere. 2017 Dec;188:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.163. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
2
Comparison of residual NAPL source removal techniques in 3D metric scale experiments.三维尺度实验中残留非水相液体源去除技术的比较
J Contam Hydrol. 2017 Jul;202:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
3
Enhanced removal of VOCs from aquifers during air sparging using thickeners and surfactants: Bench-scale experiments.在空气注射过程中使用增稠剂和表面活性剂增强从含水层中去除挥发性有机化合物:实验室规模实验
J Contam Hydrol. 2016 Jan;184:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
4
Remediation characteristics of surfactant-enhanced air sparging (SEAS) technology on volatile organic compounds contaminated soil with low permeability.表面活性剂强化空气注入(SEAS)技术对低渗透挥发性有机化合物污染土壤的修复特性。
J Contam Hydrol. 2022 Oct;250:104049. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104049. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
5
Mechanisms of surfactant-enhanced air sparging in different media.表面活性剂强化空气喷射在不同介质中的机理。
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2013;48(9):1047-55. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2013.773809.
6
Remediation of nonaqueous phase liquid polluted sites using surfactant-enhanced air sparging and soil vapor extraction.使用表面活性剂强化空气注入和土壤蒸气提取技术修复受非水相液体污染的场地。
Water Environ Res. 2013 Feb;85(2):133-40. doi: 10.2175/106143012x13560205144173.
7
Surfactant-enhanced ozone sparging for removal of organic compounds from sand.表面活性剂强化臭氧气提去除砂中的有机化合物。
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2013;48(5):526-33. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2013.730438.
8
Effect of increased groundwater viscosity on the remedial performance of surfactant-enhanced air sparging.地下水黏度增加对表面活性剂强化空气注入修复性能的影响。
J Contam Hydrol. 2018 Mar;210:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
9
Application of multiphase transport models to field remediation by air sparging and soil vapor extraction.多相传输模型在空气注射和土壤气相抽提现场修复中的应用。
J Hazard Mater. 2007 May 8;143(1-2):156-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.098. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
10
Field application of modified in situ soil flushing in combination with air sparging at a military site polluted by diesel and gasoline in Korea.韩国某受柴油和汽油污染的军事场地采用改良原位土壤冲洗与空气注射相结合的现场应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Aug 27;11(9):8806-24. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110908806.

引用本文的文献

1
Surfactant-Based Chemical Washing to Remediate Oil-Contaminated Soil: The State of Knowledge.基于表面活性剂的化学清洗修复石油污染土壤:知识现状
Toxics. 2024 Sep 4;12(9):648. doi: 10.3390/toxics12090648.
2
Decontamination of water co-polluted by copper, toluene and tetrahydrofuran using lauric acid.使用月桂酸对同时受到铜、甲苯和四氢呋喃污染的水进行脱污处理。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 22;12(1):15832. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20241-4.
3
Remediation of TCE-contaminated groundwater using KMnO oxidation: laboratory and field-scale studies.采用 KMnO4 氧化法修复 TCE 污染地下水:实验室和现场研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(33):34027-34038. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3099-3. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
4
Biotoxicity of Water-Soluble UV Photodegradation Products for 10 Typical Gaseous VOCs.10 种典型气态 VOCs 水相光解产物的生物毒性
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 18;15(7):1520. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071520.