Siriwardena Ajith K, Jegatheeswaran Santhalingam, Mason James M
Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK; Faculty of Biology, Health and Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Oct;7(10):913-921. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00212-6. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Differentiating inflammation from bacterial infection in patients with acute pancreatitis can be difficult. Procalcitonin can distinguish infection from inflammation, and algorithms based on procalcitonin measurement can differentiate bacterial sepsis from a systemic inflammatory response. We aimed to test the hypothesis that a procalcitonin-based algorithm to guide initiation, continuation, and discontinuation of antibiotics could lead to reduced antibiotic use without an adverse effect on outcome in acute pancreatitis.
PROCAP was a single-centre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial done at the Manchester Royal Infirmary (Manchester, UK). Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had a clinical diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to procalcitonin-guided care or usual care using web-based randomisation software. The randomisation sequence was stratified by disease severity and admission pathway, using variable block sizes of 4, 6, or 8. Patients, but not clinicians, were masked to group assignment. In the procalcitonin-guided care group, procalcitonin testing was conducted on days 0, 4, 7, and weekly thereafter. Guidance was to stop or not start antibiotics following a test value of less than 1·0 ng/mL and to start or continue antibiotics following a test value of 1·0 ng/mL or more. In the intervention group, any empirical clinical decision to use antibiotics was preceded by measurement of procalcitonin. Otherwise, both groups received standard care. The primary outcome was use of antibiotics during the index admission to hospital. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, ISRCTN 50584992.
Between July 29, 2018, and Nov 13, 2020, 369 patients were screened, of whom 260 were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment group (132 to procalcitonin-guided care and 128 to usual care). 59 (45%) of patients in the procalcitonin-guided care group were prescribed antibiotics compared with 79 (63%) in the usual care group (adjusted risk difference -15·6% [95% CI -27·0 to -4·2]; p=0·0071). The odds ratio for the treatment effect was 0·49 (95% CI 0·29 to 0·83; p=0·0077). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of the number of clinical infections or hospital-acquired infections per patient. Four (3%) patients in the procalcitonin-guided care group and three (2%) patients in the usual care group died; all deaths were related to underlying severe pancreatitis. There was no difference in adverse events between the groups.
Our findings suggest that procalcitonin-guided care can reduce antibiotic use without increasing infection or harm in patients with acute pancreatitis. Procalcitonin-based algorithms to guide antibiotic use should be considered in the care of this group of patients and be incorporated into future guidelines on the management of acute pancreatitis.
None.
区分急性胰腺炎患者的炎症与细菌感染可能存在困难。降钙素原可区分感染与炎症,基于降钙素原测量的算法能够鉴别细菌性脓毒症与全身炎症反应。我们旨在验证以下假设:基于降钙素原的算法用于指导抗生素的起始、持续使用及停用,可减少抗生素使用,且对急性胰腺炎患者的预后无不良影响。
PROCAP研究是在英国曼彻斯特皇家医院进行的一项单中心、患者盲法、随机对照试验。符合条件的参与者年龄在18岁及以上,临床诊断为急性胰腺炎。参与者通过基于网络的随机软件按1:1随机分配至降钙素原指导治疗组或常规治疗组。随机序列按疾病严重程度和入院途径分层,采用4、6或8的可变区组大小。患者被设盲分组,但临床医生不设盲。在降钙素原指导治疗组,于第0、4、7天及之后每周进行降钙素原检测。若检测值低于1.0 ng/mL,则指导停止使用或不开始使用抗生素;若检测值为1.0 ng/mL或更高,则指导开始或继续使用抗生素。在干预组,任何使用抗生素的经验性临床决策之前均需检测降钙素原。否则,两组均接受标准治疗。主要结局是首次住院期间抗生素的使用情况。所有分析均在意向性治疗人群中进行。本研究已在国际标准随机对照试验注册库ISRCTN 50584992注册。
2018年7月29日至2020年11月13日期间,共筛查369例患者,其中260例入组并随机分配至治疗组(132例至降钙素原指导治疗组,128例至常规治疗组)。降钙素原指导治疗组59例(45%)患者使用了抗生素,而常规治疗组为79例(63%)(校正风险差异-15.6%[95%CI -27.0至-4.2];p = .0071)。治疗效果的比值比为0.49(95%CI 0.29至0.83;p = .0077)。两组患者的临床感染或医院获得性感染数量无显著差异。降钙素原指导治疗组4例(3%)患者和常规治疗组3例(2%)患者死亡;所有死亡均与潜在的严重胰腺炎相关。两组不良事件无差异。
我们的研究结果表明,降钙素原指导治疗可减少急性胰腺炎患者的抗生素使用,且不增加感染或危害。在这组患者的治疗中应考虑采用基于降钙素原的算法来指导抗生素使用,并纳入未来急性胰腺炎管理指南。
无。