Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Jul;8(7):895-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency (RF) energy is associated with a collateral ganglionated plexi ablation. Pulsed electric field (PEF) is a nonthermal energy source that preferentially affects the myocardial cells and spares neural tissue.
This study investigated whether PVI by a PEF compared with RF energy will result in less prominent alteration of the cardiac autonomic nervous system.
A total of 31 patients with atrial fibrillation underwent PVI using a novel lattice-tip catheter and PEF energy (n = 18) or a conventional irrigated-tip catheter and RF energy (n = 13). The response of the sinoatrial node and atrioventricular node to extracardiac high-frequency, high-output, right vagal nerve stimulation was evaluated at baseline and during and at the end of the ablation procedure. Substantial reduction in responsiveness was arbitrarily defined as stimulation-inducible pause <1.5 seconds.
Reduced response of the sinoatrial node was documented in 13 of 13 (100%) and 6 of 18 (33%) patients (P = 0.0001) in RF and PEF groups, respectively. Reduced response of the atrioventricular node was found in 10 of 11 (93%) and 6 of 18 (33%) patients (P = 0.002) in RF and PEF groups, respectively. The major effects were observed predominantly during ablation around the right pulmonary veins. Early recovery of ganglionated plexi function was noticed only in the PEF ablation group. RF ablation resulted in higher acceleration of the sinus rhythm compared with PEF ablation (20 ± 13 beats/min vs 12 ± 10 beats/min; P = 0.04).
PEF compared with RF energy used for PVI induces significantly weaker and less durable suppression of cardiac autonomic regulations.
射频(RF)能量的肺静脉隔离(PVI)与副神经节丛消融相关。脉冲电场(PEF)是非热能源,优先影响心肌细胞而保留神经组织。
本研究旨在探讨与 RF 能量相比,PEF 行 PVI 是否会导致心脏自主神经系统的改变不那么明显。
共 31 例心房颤动患者接受了使用新型网格尖端导管和 PEF 能量(n=18)或传统灌流尖端导管和 RF 能量(n=13)的 PVI。在基线、消融过程中和结束时,通过心外高频、高输出、右侧迷走神经刺激评估窦房结和房室结对刺激的反应。任意定义显著反应减少为刺激诱导的暂停<1.5 秒。
在 RF 和 PEF 组中,窦房结反应减少分别见于 13 例(100%)和 6 例(33%)患者(P=0.0001)。房室结反应减少分别见于 11 例(93%)和 6 例(33%)患者(P=0.002)。主要影响主要发生在右肺静脉周围消融期间。仅在 PEF 消融组中观察到神经节丛功能的早期恢复。与 PEF 消融相比,RF 消融导致窦性节律加速更高(20±13 次/分比 12±10 次/分;P=0.04)。
与用于 PVI 的 RF 能量相比,PEF 能量诱导的心脏自主调节抑制作用明显减弱且持续时间更短。