• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带锁锥形种植体-基台连接的种植体支持的牙冠:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Implant-supported crowns with locking taper implant-abutment connection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

PhD student, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Technology and Sciences (UniFTC), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Aug;132(2):369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.005
PMID:35864024
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Implant-supported single crowns are more prone to screw loosening than splinted prostheses. Therefore, the locking taper system, which has a screwless abutment, may perform better when associated with this type of rehabilitation. However, systematic reviews on this system are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical performance and complications of single crowns retained by the locking taper system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This systematic review was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under CRD42020189921. An electronic search was made in 5 databases and 3 other sources up to February 2021 to select prospective clinical studies evaluating the performance of single crowns retained by the locking taper system by using the outcomes implant survival, success rate, complications, marginal bone loss (MBL), and prosthesis success rate. Four meta-analyses grouped according to the follow-up intervals were performed. The risk of bias of the selected studies was evaluated by using the RoB 2 checklist for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Downs and Black for uncontrolled studies.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included: 9 prospective cohort studies and 3 RCTs. A survival rate of 99% (98% to 99%) and a success rate of 97% (92% to 99%) after 5 years were found. Of the total, 2.6% biological and 2.9% prosthetic complications were described. The prosthesis success rate was 97% (96% to 98%) after 5 years. An average of -0.73 mm (-0.93 to -0.52) was found for the MBL after 5 years. The risk-of-bias assessment showed 2 RCTs with high risk and 1 RCT with low risk of bias. Among uncontrolled studies, 2 were classified as poor and 7 as fair.

CONCLUSIONS

Single crowns retained by locking taper implants can be safely indicated based on the high survival and success rates achieved in the long term, the maintenance of bone level stability over time, and the low incidence of complications.

摘要

问题陈述

与桥体修复体相比,种植体支持的单冠更易发生螺丝松动。因此,当涉及到这种修复类型时,具有无螺丝基台的锁定锥度系统可能表现更好。然而,目前缺乏对此系统的系统评价。

目的

本系统评价的目的是评估使用锁定锥度系统固位的单冠的临床性能和并发症。

材料和方法

本系统评价已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)中注册,注册号为 CRD42020189921。电子检索了 5 个数据库和另外 3 个来源,以选择评估使用锁定锥度系统固位的单冠的性能的前瞻性临床研究,使用的结局包括种植体存活率、成功率、并发症、边缘骨吸收(MBL)和修复体成功率。根据随访时间间隔进行了 4 项荟萃分析。使用随机对照试验(RCT)的 RoB 2 清单和未对照研究的 Downs 和 Black 对所选研究的偏倚风险进行了评估。

结果

纳入了 12 项研究:9 项前瞻性队列研究和 3 项 RCT。5 年后发现,存活率为 99%(98%至 99%),成功率为 97%(92%至 99%)。总共描述了 2.6%的生物学并发症和 2.9%的修复体并发症。5 年后,修复体成功率为 97%(96%至 98%)。5 年后 MBL 的平均值为-0.73mm(-0.93 至-0.52)。偏倚风险评估显示 2 项 RCT 存在高风险,1 项 RCT 存在低风险。在未对照研究中,2 项被评为差,7 项评为一般。

结论

根据长期获得的高存活率和成功率、随时间稳定的骨水平以及低并发症发生率,使用锁定锥度种植体固位的单冠可以安全使用。

相似文献

1
Implant-supported crowns with locking taper implant-abutment connection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.带锁锥形种植体-基台连接的种植体支持的牙冠:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Aug;132(2):369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
Angulated titanium bases screw channel abutments for single implant restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于单颗种植体修复的成角钛基台螺丝通道基台:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Mar;34(3):240-251. doi: 10.1111/jopr.14032. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Effect of the attachments on clinical outcomes of mandibular distal extension implant-supported removable partial dentures: A systematic review.附件对下颌远中游离缺失种植覆盖义齿临床效果的影响:系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1211-1220. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
4
Comparison of external, internal flat-to-flat, and conical implant abutment connections for implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.种植体支持修复体的外部、内部平面到平面以及锥形种植体基台连接的比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Sep;130(3):327-340. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.029. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
5
Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses?哪些机械和物理测试方法与预测陶瓷基牙科修复体的临床性能相关?
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:218-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01460.x.
6
Prognosis of Combining Remaining Teeth and Implants in Double-Crown-Retained Removable Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.双冠固位可摘义齿中剩余天然牙与种植体联合应用的预后:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 March/April;33(2):281–297. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5796. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.缺失牙修复干预措施:不同类型的牙种植体
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD003815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub2.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.缺失牙修复干预措施:不同类型的牙种植体
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD003815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub3.
10
Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).牙支持式固定义齿(FDPs)、种植体支持式FDPs及单冠(SCs)的生存率和并发症发生率比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:97-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Experimental study on implant-abutment locking force and abutment subsidence in a pure Morse taper connection implant system.纯莫氏锥度连接种植体系统中种植体-基台锁合力与基台下沉的实验研究。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 1;42(3):372-381. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023387.
2
The Comparison of Survival Rates between Narrow Diameter Implants and Standard Diameter Implants: An Updated Meta-analysis.窄径种植体与标准径种植体生存率的比较:一项更新的Meta分析。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 Feb 9;37:5. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.5. eCollection 2023.