Robot-Assisted Kyphoplasty Improves Clinical and Radiological Features Better Than Fluoroscopy-Assisted Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether patients treated with robot-assisted kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures have superior clinical and radiographic improvement than those treated with fluoroscopy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) databases was conducted to find randomized control trials (RCTs) or observational cohort studies that compared robotic-assisted kyphoplasty (RA-kyphoplasty) with fluoroscopy-assisted kyphoplasty (FA-kyphoplasty) in treating vertebral compression fractures. Preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up data on vertebral height (VH), vertebral kyphosis angle (VKA), visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain, and cement leakage rate were collected from eligible studies for meta-analysis. Patients were divided into RA and FA groups depending on whether the operation was robotically or fluoroscopically guided.

RESULTS

We included 6 cohort studies with 491 patients and 633 vertebrae. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the RA group had a higher VH than the FA group at both postoperation ( < 0.001) and final follow-up ( < 0.001); the VKA in the RA group was lower than that in the FA group at postoperation ( < 0.001) and final follow-up ( < 0.001); the back pain VAS score was lower in the RA group than in the FA group at postoperation ( = 0.01) and final follow-up ( = 0.03); and the cement leakage rate in the RA group was lower than those in the FA group ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that RA-kyphoplasty outperformed FA-kyphoplasty in vertebral height restoration, kyphosis angle correction, VAS score reduction for back pain, and lower cement leakage rate in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures.