• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习利用断层带过程的主动地震监测预测实验室地震的时间和剪应力演化。

Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes.

作者信息

Shreedharan Srisharan, Bolton David Chas, Rivière Jacques, Marone Chris

机构信息

Department of Geosciences Pennsylvania State University University Park USA.

Now at The University of Texas Institute for Geophysics Austin USA.

出版信息

J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2021 Jul;126(7):e2020JB021588. doi: 10.1029/2020JB021588. Epub 2021 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1029/2020JB021588
PMID:35865235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9285915/
Abstract

Machine learning (ML) techniques have become increasingly important in seismology and earthquake science. Lab-based studies have used acoustic emission data to predict time-to-failure and stress state, and in a few cases, the same approach has been used for field data. However, the underlying physical mechanisms that allow lab earthquake prediction and seismic forecasting remain poorly resolved. Here, we address this knowledge gap by coupling active-source seismic data, which probe asperity-scale processes, with ML methods. We show that elastic waves passing through the lab fault zone contain information that can predict the full spectrum of labquakes from slow slip instabilities to highly aperiodic events. The ML methods utilize systematic changes in P-wave amplitude and velocity to accurately predict the timing and shear stress during labquakes. The ML predictions improve in accuracy closer to fault failure, demonstrating that the predictive power of the ultrasonic signals improves as the fault approaches failure. Our results demonstrate that the relationship between the ultrasonic parameters and fault slip rate, and in turn, the systematically evolving real area of contact and asperity stiffness allow the gradient boosting algorithm to "learn" about the state of the fault and its proximity to failure. Broadly, our results demonstrate the utility of physics-informed ML in forecasting the imminence of fault slip at the laboratory scale, which may have important implications for earthquake mechanics in nature.

摘要

机器学习(ML)技术在地震学和地震科学中变得越来越重要。基于实验室的研究已经使用声发射数据来预测失效时间和应力状态,并且在少数情况下,相同的方法也被用于现场数据。然而,允许实验室地震预测和地震预报的潜在物理机制仍然没有得到很好的解决。在这里,我们通过将探测粗糙尺度过程的有源地震数据与机器学习方法相结合来解决这一知识差距。我们表明,穿过实验室断层带的弹性波包含可以预测从慢滑失稳到高度非周期性事件的全谱实验室地震的信息。机器学习方法利用P波振幅和速度的系统变化来准确预测实验室地震期间的时间和剪应力。机器学习预测在接近断层失效时精度提高,表明超声信号的预测能力随着断层接近失效而提高。我们的结果表明,超声参数与断层滑动速率之间的关系,以及进而系统演变的实际接触面积和粗糙刚度,使得梯度提升算法能够“了解”断层的状态及其接近失效的程度。广泛地说,我们的结果证明了物理信息机器学习在预测实验室尺度断层滑动紧迫性方面的效用,这可能对自然界中的地震力学具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/2bf9385bb56a/JGRB-126-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/926d13bf1e0c/JGRB-126-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/9526f29535ce/JGRB-126-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/eaff27d0222a/JGRB-126-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/ad6100700403/JGRB-126-0-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/7bde7847854d/JGRB-126-0-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/e1bedbd46d17/JGRB-126-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/6940cf71bdd2/JGRB-126-0-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/45646dbc1967/JGRB-126-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/2bf9385bb56a/JGRB-126-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/926d13bf1e0c/JGRB-126-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/9526f29535ce/JGRB-126-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/eaff27d0222a/JGRB-126-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/ad6100700403/JGRB-126-0-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/7bde7847854d/JGRB-126-0-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/e1bedbd46d17/JGRB-126-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/6940cf71bdd2/JGRB-126-0-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/45646dbc1967/JGRB-126-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0050/9285915/2bf9385bb56a/JGRB-126-0-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes.机器学习利用断层带过程的主动地震监测预测实验室地震的时间和剪应力演化。
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2021 Jul;126(7):e2020JB021588. doi: 10.1029/2020JB021588. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
2
The High-Frequency Signature of Slow and Fast Laboratory Earthquakes.慢速和快速实验室地震的高频特征
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2022 Jun;127(6):e2022JB024170. doi: 10.1029/2022JB024170. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
3
Acoustic Energy Release During the Laboratory Seismic Cycle: Insights on Laboratory Earthquake Precursors and Prediction.实验室地震周期中的声能释放:对实验室地震前兆和预测的见解
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2020 Aug;125(8):e2019JB018975. doi: 10.1029/2019JB018975. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Foreshock properties illuminate nucleation processes of slow and fast laboratory earthquakes.前震特性可以揭示实验室中慢地震和快地震的成核过程。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 29;14(1):3859. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39399-0.
5
Precursory changes in seismic velocity for the spectrum of earthquake failure modes.地震破坏模式频谱的地震波速度前兆变化。
Nat Geosci. 2016 Sep;9(9):695-700. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2775. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Using a physics-informed neural network and fault zone acoustic monitoring to predict lab earthquakes.利用物理信息神经网络和断层带声监测预测实验室地震。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 21;14(1):3693. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39377-6.
7
Slow earthquakes, preseismic velocity changes, and the origin of slow frictional stick-slip.慢地震、震前速度变化与慢摩擦粘滑的起源
Science. 2013 Sep 13;341(6151):1229-32. doi: 10.1126/science.1239577. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
8
Frequency-Magnitude Statistics of Laboratory Foreshocks Vary With Shear Velocity, Fault Slip Rate, and Shear Stress.实验室前震的频率-震级统计随剪切速度、断层滑动速率和剪应力而变化。
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2021 Nov;126(11):e2021JB022175. doi: 10.1029/2021JB022175. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
9
Physics informed neural network can retrieve rate and state friction parameters from acoustic monitoring of laboratory stick-slip experiments.物理信息神经网络可以从实验室粘滑实验的声学监测中获取速率和状态摩擦参数。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 19;14(1):24624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75826-y.
10
Shallow fault-zone dilatancy recovery after the 2003 Bam earthquake in Iran.2003年伊朗巴姆地震后浅层断裂带扩容恢复情况。
Nature. 2009 Mar 5;458(7234):64-8. doi: 10.1038/nature07817.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights on earthquake nucleation revealed by numerical simulation and unsupervised machine learning of laboratory-scale earthquake.通过实验室尺度地震的数值模拟和无监督机器学习揭示的地震成核见解。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 21;14(1):28812. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80136-4.
2
Probing the evolution of fault properties during the seismic cycle with deep learning.利用深度学习探究地震周期内断层性质的演变。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 20;15(1):10025. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54153-w.
3
Physics informed neural network can retrieve rate and state friction parameters from acoustic monitoring of laboratory stick-slip experiments.

本文引用的文献

1
Acoustic Energy Release During the Laboratory Seismic Cycle: Insights on Laboratory Earthquake Precursors and Prediction.实验室地震周期中的声能释放:对实验室地震前兆和预测的见解
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2020 Aug;125(8):e2019JB018975. doi: 10.1029/2019JB018975. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
An exponential build-up in seismic energy suggests a months-long nucleation of slow slip in Cascadia.地震能量呈指数级增长表明卡斯卡迪亚地区发生了长达数月的慢滑移成核过程。
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 18;11(1):4139. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17754-9.
3
Earthquake transformer-an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking.
物理信息神经网络可以从实验室粘滑实验的声学监测中获取速率和状态摩擦参数。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 19;14(1):24624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75826-y.
4
A laboratory perspective on accelerating preparatory processes before earthquakes and implications for foreshock detectability.从实验室角度看地震前加速准备过程及其对前震可探测性的影响。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 3;15(1):5588. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49959-7.
5
Using a physics-informed neural network and fault zone acoustic monitoring to predict lab earthquakes.利用物理信息神经网络和断层带声监测预测实验室地震。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 21;14(1):3693. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39377-6.
地震变压器——一种用于同时进行地震检测和相位拾取的专注的深度学习模型。
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 7;11(1):3952. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17591-w.
4
Machine Learning Reveals the Seismic Signature of Eruptive Behavior at Piton de la Fournaise Volcano.机器学习揭示了富尔奈斯火山喷发行为的地震信号。
Geophys Res Lett. 2020 Feb 16;47(3):e2019GL085523. doi: 10.1029/2019GL085523. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
5
Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience.用于固体地球地球科学中数据驱动发现的机器学习。
Science. 2019 Mar 22;363(6433). doi: 10.1126/science.aau0323.
6
Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location.用于地震检测与定位的卷积神经网络。
Sci Adv. 2018 Feb 14;4(2):e1700578. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700578. eCollection 2018 Feb.
7
Precursory changes in seismic velocity for the spectrum of earthquake failure modes.地震破坏模式频谱的地震波速度前兆变化。
Nat Geosci. 2016 Sep;9(9):695-700. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2775. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
8
Laboratory observations of slow earthquakes and the spectrum of tectonic fault slip modes.慢地震的实验室观测与构造断层滑动模式谱
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 31;7:11104. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11104.
9
Earthquake detection through computationally efficient similarity search.通过计算效率高的相似性搜索进行地震检测。
Sci Adv. 2015 Dec 4;1(11):e1501057. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501057. eCollection 2015 Dec.
10
Slow earthquakes, preseismic velocity changes, and the origin of slow frictional stick-slip.慢地震、震前速度变化与慢摩擦粘滑的起源
Science. 2013 Sep 13;341(6151):1229-32. doi: 10.1126/science.1239577. Epub 2013 Aug 15.