Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
J Int Med Res. 2022 Jul;50(7):3000605221112777. doi: 10.1177/03000605221112777.
To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of nasal pillow-noninvasive ventilation (NP-NIV) compared with high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) in postsurgical patients.
This propensity score-matched retrospective study enrolled postoperative patients that received NP-NIV (NP-NIV group) or HFNT (HFNT group) in the intensive care unit. Data were collected from their medical records and the tolerability and respiratory status before and after extubation were compared between the two groups.
The study enrolled 83 patients in the NP-NIV group and 27 patients in the HFNT group. After propensity score matching, there were 19 patients in each group. After matching, there were no significant differences in the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics before extubation. The tolerability was similar in both groups. When the NP-NIV group was compared with the HFNT group, the respiratory rate was significantly lower (median 16 [interquartile range, 14-17] versus median 19 [interquartile range, 18-26], respectively) and the partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio was significantly higher (median 205 [174-256] versus median 155 [130-192], respectively) at 1 h after extubation.
NP-NIV was equally well tolerated and provided better respiratory support than HFNT in postsurgical patients.
评估鼻枕无创通气(NP-NIV)与高流量鼻导管通气(HFNT)在术后患者中的耐受性和疗效。
本回顾性倾向评分匹配研究纳入了在重症监护病房接受 NP-NIV(NP-NIV 组)或 HFNT(HFNT 组)治疗的术后患者。从病历中收集数据,并比较两组患者拔管前后的耐受性和呼吸状况。
NP-NIV 组纳入 83 例患者,HFNT 组纳入 27 例患者。经倾向评分匹配后,每组各有 19 例患者。匹配后,两组患者拔管前的基本人口统计学和临床特征无显著差异。两组患者的耐受性相似。与 HFNT 组相比,NP-NIV 组的呼吸频率显著更低(中位数 16[四分位距 14-17]比中位数 19[四分位距 18-26]),拔管后 1 小时动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数比显著更高(中位数 205[174-256]比中位数 155[130-192])。
NP-NIV 与 HFNT 相比,在术后患者中具有相同的耐受性,并能提供更好的呼吸支持。