FLUIDIC PERFORMANCE OF A DUAL-ACTION VITRECTOMY PROBE COMPARED WITH A SINGLE-ACTION PROBE.

PURPOSE

To assess flow rates, nearfield effects, and traction of a dual-cutting 20,000 cpm vitrectomy probe (HYPERVIT, Alcon) versus a single-cutting 10,000 cpm probe (Advanced ULTRAVIT, Alcon).

METHODS

Flow rates were evaluated for 25+ and 27+ gauge probes using balanced salt solution or porcine cadaver vitreous (biased open, 50/50, and biased closed duty cycles). Probes were suspended in an open beaker, and flow rates were calculated using a precision balance. Nearfield effects and flow pulsatility were assessed using a validated simulation model based on experimental microparticle image velocimetry. Traction was assessed by attaching vitreous to a cantilever beam and measuring the deflection of the beam.

RESULTS

For HYPERVIT probes, aqueous flow rates were similar across all cutting rates. Vitreous flow rates increased with increasing cutting rates. At maximum cutting rates, aqueous flow was 62%-67% greater (25+) and 63% greater (27+) with HYPERVIT versus Advanced ULTRAVIT ( P < 0.05); vitreous flow was 44%-47% greater (25+) and 26%-32% greater (27+) with HYPERVIT versus Advanced ULTRAVIT ( P < 0.05). Nearfield effects were reduced, and peak traction forces were significantly lower for HYPERVIT versus Advanced ULTRAVIT ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Significantly greater aspiration flow, reduced nearfield effects, and reduced traction were observed with dual-action versus single-action probes.