Suppr超能文献

在患有糖尿病足感染的人群中,细菌与结局的关系以及采样方法的影响。

The association between bacteria and outcome and the influence of sampling method, in people with a diabetic foot infection.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Infectious Diseases, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Infection. 2023 Apr;51(2):347-354. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01884-x. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Different bacteria lead to divers diabetic foot infections (DFIs), and some bacteria probably lead to higher amputation and mortality risks. We assessed mortality and amputation risk in relation to bacterial profiles in people DFI and investigated the role of sampling method.

METHODS

We included people (> 18 years) with DFI in this retrospective study (2011-2020) at a Dutch tertiary care hospital. We retrieved cultures according to best sampling method: (1) bone biopsy; (2) ulcer bed biopsy; and (3) swab. We aggregated data into a composite determinant, consisting of unrepeated bacteria of one episode of infection, clustered into 5 profiles: (1) Streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus; (2) coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Cutibacterium, Corynebacterium and Enterococcus; (3) gram-negative; (4) Anaerobic; and (5) less common gram-positive bacteria. We calculated Hazard Ratio's (HR's) using time-dependent-Cox regression for the analyses and investigated effect modification by sampling method.

RESULTS

We included 139 people, with 447 person-years follow-up and 459 episodes of infection. Sampling method modified the association between bacterial profiles and amputation for profile 2. HR's (95% CI's) for amputation for bacterial profiles 1-5: 0.7 (0.39-1.1); stratified analysis for profile 2: bone biopsy 0.84 (0.26-2.7), ulcer bed biopsy 0.89 (0.34-2.3), swab 5.9*(2.9-11.8); 1.3 (0.78-2.1); 1.6 (0.91-2.6); 1.6 (0.58-4.5). HR's (95% CI's) for mortality for bacterial profiles 1-5: 0.89 (0.49-1.6); 0.73 (0.38-1.4); 2.6*(1.4-4.8); 1.1(0.58-2.2); 0.80(0.19-3.3).

CONCLUSIONS

In people with DFI, there was no association between bacterial profiles in ulcer bed and bone biopsies and amputation. Only in swab cultures, low-pathogenic bacteria (profile 2), were associated with a higher amputation risk. Infection with gram-negative bacteria was associated with a higher mortality risk. This study underlined the possible negative outcome of DFI treatment based on swabs cultures.

摘要

目的

不同的细菌会导致不同的糖尿病足感染(DFI),而某些细菌可能会导致更高的截肢和死亡风险。我们评估了与细菌谱相关的死亡率和截肢风险,并研究了采样方法的作用。

方法

我们在荷兰一家三级护理医院进行了这项回顾性研究(2011-2020 年),纳入患有 DFI 的成年人(>18 岁)。根据最佳采样方法,我们提取了培养物:(1)骨活检;(2)溃疡床活检;和(3)拭子。我们将数据汇总成一个复合决定因素,由一个感染期的重复细菌组成,分为 5 种类型:(1)链球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌;(2)凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、毛霉科、棒状杆菌和肠球菌;(3)革兰氏阴性菌;(4)厌氧菌;和(5)较不常见的革兰氏阳性菌。我们使用时间依赖性 Cox 回归分析计算危险比(HR),并研究了采样方法的效应修饰作用。

结果

我们纳入了 139 人,随访 447 人年,共发生 459 例感染。采样方法改变了细菌谱与截肢之间的关联,对细菌谱 2 有影响。细菌谱 1-5 的截肢 HR(95%CI)为 0.7(0.39-1.1);细菌谱 2 的分层分析:骨活检 0.84(0.26-2.7),溃疡床活检 0.89(0.34-2.3),拭子 5.9*(2.9-11.8);1.3(0.78-2.1);1.6(0.91-2.6);1.6(0.58-4.5)。细菌谱 1-5 的死亡率 HR(95%CI)为 0.89(0.49-1.6);0.73(0.38-1.4);2.6*(1.4-4.8);1.1(0.58-2.2);0.80(0.19-3.3)。

结论

在患有 DFI 的患者中,溃疡床和骨活检中的细菌谱与截肢之间没有关联。只有在拭子培养物中,低致病性细菌(谱 2)与更高的截肢风险相关。革兰氏阴性菌感染与更高的死亡率相关。这项研究强调了基于拭子培养物的 DFI 治疗可能带来的负面结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c35/10042898/d36a04a82ef7/15010_2022_1884_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验