Neves José Miguel, Duarte Bruno, Pinto Margarida, Formiga Ana, Neves José
1 Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central.
2 Microbiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central.
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019 Jun;18(2):122-128. doi: 10.1177/1534734619839815. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
Most moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infections (DFIs) require hospitalization with urgent surgical approach and administration of empiric antibiotherapy. To ensure optimal antibiotic coverage, regular microbiological background updates are imperative. The purpose is to characterize the microbiological profile and the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the DFI causative pathogens isolated within a specialized DFI unit of a tertiary hospital, in order to establish evidence-based policies regarding empirical antibiotic use. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Microbiological cultures and corresponding antibiotic sensitivity tests collected from moderate-to-severe DFIs as a first approach to the hospitalized patient were retrieved and analyzed during a 12-month period. Two groups were analyzed: inpatients that had been previously followed at the diabetic foot clinic of the hospital and inpatients without a previous contact with the hospital services. A total of 125 isolates obtained from 87 patients were deemed for analysis. Globally, a predominance of Gram-positive bacteria was observed (60%). was the most common pathogen. The global ratio of methicillin-sensitive to methicillin-resistant (MRSA) was 1.3:1, with similar findings in both groups. According to the antibiotic sensitivity test results, and within the recommended empiric antibiotic regimens for DFI, piperacillin/tazobactam seems to be the most suitable option. Gram-positive bacteria prevail as the main isolates in DFIs. Screening for MRSA-specific risk factors is mandatory. When going for a first empiric therapy, piperacillin/tazobactam is recommended in this institution, and an anti-MRSA agent should be added early, if necessary. We encourage continuous monitoring for the bacterial prevalence in Portuguese diabetic foot centers as it is paramount for the decision making regarding DFI protocols.
大多数中重度糖尿病足感染(DFI)需要住院治疗,采取紧急手术方法并给予经验性抗生素治疗。为确保最佳的抗生素覆盖范围,定期更新微生物学背景至关重要。目的是描述在一家三级医院的专门DFI科室中分离出的DFI致病病原体的微生物学特征和抗生素敏感性模式,以便制定关于经验性抗生素使用的循证政策。进行了一项横断面研究。在12个月期间,检索并分析了从中重度DFI患者作为住院患者的首要治疗方法收集的微生物培养物和相应的抗生素敏感性测试。分析了两组:曾在医院糖尿病足诊所接受过随访的住院患者和之前未接触过医院服务的住院患者。共对从87例患者中获得的125株分离菌进行了分析。总体而言,观察到革兰氏阳性菌占优势(60%)。 是最常见的病原体。甲氧西林敏感 与耐甲氧西林 (MRSA)的总体比例为1.3:1,两组结果相似。根据抗生素敏感性测试结果,在推荐的DFI经验性抗生素治疗方案中,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦似乎是最合适的选择。革兰氏阳性菌是DFI中主要的分离菌。必须筛查MRSA的特定危险因素。在本机构进行首次经验性治疗时,推荐使用哌拉西林/他唑巴坦,如有必要,应尽早添加抗MRSA药物。我们鼓励葡萄牙糖尿病足中心持续监测细菌流行情况,因为这对于DFI治疗方案的决策至关重要。