• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术降低眼压的预测因素:一项前瞻性试验。

Predictors of intraocular pressure reduction after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: a prospective trial.

作者信息

Devience Eva X, Awidi Abdelhalim, Kalarn Sachin, DeVience Stephen, Bui Brendan, Munir Wuqaas M, Kaleem Mona A, Im Lily, Jeng Bennie H, Daoud Yassine, Saeedi Osamah J

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;43(1):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02427-x. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-022-02427-x
PMID:35870049
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and phacoemulsification parameters in patients who underwent both conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).

METHODS

This was a prospective multicenter comparative study that enrolled 90 participants who underwent cataract surgery at the University of Maryland Medical System and the Wilmer Eye Institute. Patients underwent FLACS in one eye and CPS in the fellow eye. IOP was measured prior to surgery and monitored through six months postoperatively. Demographic, clinical, biometric, and intraoperative variables including cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time, and phacoemulsification time were analyzed for any significant association with postoperative IOP. Postoperative IOP reduction was the primary outcome variable. A secondary goal of the study was to determine differences in postoperative IOP reduction between CPS and FLACS cohorts.

RESULTS

In total, 157 non-glaucomatous eyes were included. Using multivariable analysis, we found preoperative IOP to be consistently associated with postoperative IOP reduction in the entire cohort. At the 6-month follow-up visit, there was a 12.4% reduction in IOP (-2.2 ± 3.4 mm Hg) seen, with no statistically significant difference between FLACS and CPS (12.3% ± 19.4% vs 12.5% ± 19.3%, respectively, p = 0.32). FLACS reduced the CDE required for phacoemulsification (6.6 ± 4.4%-seconds vs 8.6 ± 6.9%-seconds, respectively, p < 0.05). CDE was a predictor of IOP response at 6 months, but subgroup analysis revealed that this trend was driven by seven eyes requiring high CDE, and for the majority of eyes, CDE did not influence the size of the decrease. The seven eyes experiencing highest CDE were less likely to show IOP reduction at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Both FLACS and CPS resulted in similar and significant IOP reductions through 6 months after surgery. Preoperative IOP was significantly associated with IOP reduction, and CDE generally did not influence the size of the decrease.

摘要

目的

评估接受传统超声乳化白内障手术(CPS)和飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)的患者术后眼压(IOP)降低与超声乳化参数之间的关联。

方法

这是一项前瞻性多中心比较研究,纳入了90名在马里兰大学医学系统和威尔默眼科研究所接受白内障手术的参与者。患者一只眼睛接受FLACS,另一只眼睛接受CPS。在手术前测量眼压,并在术后六个月进行监测。分析人口统计学、临床、生物测量和术中变量,包括累积消散能量(CDE)、抽吸时间和超声乳化时间,以确定其与术后眼压的任何显著关联。术后眼压降低是主要结局变量。该研究的次要目标是确定CPS和FLACS队列之间术后眼压降低的差异。

结果

总共纳入了157只非青光眼眼睛。通过多变量分析,我们发现术前眼压与整个队列中的术后眼压降低始终相关。在6个月的随访中,眼压降低了12.4%(-2.2±3.4 mmHg),FLACS和CPS之间无统计学显著差异(分别为±19.4%和±19.3%,p = 0.32)。FLACS减少了超声乳化所需的CDE(分别为6.6±4.4%-秒和8.6±6.9%-秒,p < 0.05)。CDE是6个月时眼压反应的预测指标,但亚组分析显示,这一趋势是由7只需要高CDE的眼睛驱动的,对于大多数眼睛来说,CDE并不影响降低幅度的大小。经历最高CDE的7只眼睛在6个月时眼压降低的可能性较小。

结论

FLACS和CPS在术后6个月均导致了相似且显著的眼压降低。术前眼压与眼压降低显著相关,并且CDE通常不影响降低幅度的大小。

相似文献

1
Predictors of intraocular pressure reduction after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: a prospective trial.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术降低眼压的预测因素:一项前瞻性试验。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;43(1):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02427-x. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
2
Comparison of ultrasound energy consumption between low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients with different cataract densities.不同白内障密度患者中低能量飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障手术的超声能量消耗比较
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;33(3):1373-1379. doi: 10.1177/11206721221147952. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
3
Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification in vitrectomized eyes - A prospective interventional study.玻璃体切割术后的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术的临床疗效比较-一项前瞻性干预研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 1;72(9):1285-1290. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1804_23. Epub 2024 May 20.
4
Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy between conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with two different lens fragmentation patterns.比较两种不同晶状体粉碎模式的传统超声乳化白内障吸除术与飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的累积弥散能量。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Mar;37(2):843-848. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03321-1. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
5
Visual and refractive outcomes and complications in femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery: findings from a randomised, controlled clinical trial.飞秒激光辅助与传统超声乳化白内障手术的视力和屈光结果及并发症:一项随机对照临床试验的结果。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;104(11):1596-1600. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314548. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
6
Comparative study of FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification for cataract patients with high myopia.高度近视白内障患者的 FLACS 与传统超声乳化术的对比研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Jun 1;50(6):624-630. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001425.
7
Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术中累积离散能量(CDE)的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;39(8):1761-1766. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0996-x. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
8
Endothelial cell loss and refractive predictability in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with conventional cataract surgery.与传统白内障手术相比,飞秒激光辅助白内障手术中的内皮细胞丢失和屈光可预测性。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;92(7):617-22. doi: 10.1111/aos.12406. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
9
Comparison of the selected parameters of the anterior segment of the eye between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, microincision cataract surgery, and conventional phacoemulsification: A case-control study.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术、微切口白内障手术和传统超声乳化白内障吸除术眼前节选定参数的比较:一项病例对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(52):e18340. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018340.
10
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与超声乳化白内障吸除术的比较:FACT 非劣效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(6):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta25060.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of travoprost intracameral implant administered in combination with cataract surgery.曲伏前列素前房内植入联合白内障手术的安全性和有效性
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 14;17:25158414241310275. doi: 10.1177/25158414241310275. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.