• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失业失学青年干预结果偏好的定性研究。

Intervention outcome preferences for youth who are out of work and out of school: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 80 Workman Way, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2022 Jul 23;10(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00887-5.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-022-00887-5
PMID:35870971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9308195/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While interventions have been developed and tested to help youth who have become disconnected from work and school, there is a paucity of research on young people's intervention preferences. This study aims to understand young people's preferred intervention outcomes and approaches for youth who are out of work and school.

METHODS

Thirty youth participated in virtual focus groups. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Youth want interventions and approaches that support them in (1) vocational readiness, (2) securing a job, and (3) mental health and well-being, while providing them with (4) high-contact, individualized, and integrated support.

CONCLUSIONS

Young people want interventions to be individualized and integrated, providing a high level of support for their educational and employment pursuits as well as their mental health and well-being. Incorporating youth's perspectives when designing interventions can increase intervention relevance and potentially service uptake, helping youth continue to pursue their educational and vocational goals.

摘要

背景

虽然已经开发和测试了一些干预措施来帮助那些与工作和学校脱节的年轻人,但对于年轻人的干预偏好的研究却很少。本研究旨在了解年轻人对失业和辍学的年轻人的首选干预结果和方法。

方法

30 名年轻人参加了虚拟焦点小组。使用主题分析对转录本进行了分析。

结果

年轻人希望干预措施和方法能够支持他们(1)职业准备,(2)找到工作,以及(3)心理健康和幸福感,同时为他们提供(4)高接触、个性化和综合的支持。

结论

年轻人希望干预措施是个性化和综合的,为他们的教育和就业追求以及他们的心理健康和幸福感提供高水平的支持。在设计干预措施时纳入年轻人的观点可以提高干预措施的相关性,并有可能增加服务的使用率,帮助年轻人继续追求他们的教育和职业目标。

相似文献

1
Intervention outcome preferences for youth who are out of work and out of school: a qualitative study.失业失学青年干预结果偏好的定性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jul 23;10(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00887-5.
2
Youth not engaged in education, employment, or training: a discrete choice experiment of service preferences in Canada.未接受教育、就业或培训的青年:加拿大服务偏好离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 27;24(1):1402. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18877-0.
3
Perspectives of youth in Ireland on school-based mental health and suicide prevention: the MYSTORY study.爱尔兰青年对学校心理健康和预防自杀的看法:MYSTORY 研究。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad049.
4
Prioritizing young people's emotional health support needs via participatory research.通过参与式研究确定年轻人的情绪健康支持需求的优先级。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Jun;24(5):263-271. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12373.
5
Mental Health Problems and Risky Health Behaviors among Young Individuals in Turkey: The Case of Being NEET.土耳其青年的心理健康问题和危险健康行为:NEET 群体案例。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2022 Sep 1;25(3):105-117.
6
A systematic review of mentorship programs to facilitate transition to post-secondary education and employment for youth and young adults with disabilities.一项关于指导计划的系统评价,该计划旨在促进残疾青年和年轻成年人向高等教育和就业的过渡。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Jul;38(14):1329-49. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1092174. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
7
INdividual Vocational and Educational Support Trial (INVEST) for young people with borderline personality disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.个体职业和教育支持试验(INVEST)用于边缘型人格障碍的年轻人:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04471-3.
8
Developing a hope-focused intervention to prevent mental health problems and improve social outcomes for young women who are not in education, employment, or training (NEET): A qualitative co-design study in deprived coastal communities in South-East England.为了预防处于教育、就业或培训(NEET)之外的年轻女性的心理健康问题并改善其社会结果,开发以希望为重点的干预措施:在英格兰东南部贫困沿海社区进行的定性共同设计研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304470. eCollection 2024.
9
Out-of-school time use in Pakistan: A qualitative study featuring youth's voices.巴基斯坦校外时间利用:一项以青年声音为特色的定性研究。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Jun;34(2):296-312. doi: 10.1111/jora.12916. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
10
The youth online training and employment system: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of an online vocational intervention for young people with mental ill health.青年在线培训和就业系统:一项针对心理健康状况不佳的年轻人的在线职业干预的随机对照试验研究方案。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;15(6):1602-1611. doi: 10.1111/eip.13100. Epub 2021 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Youth not engaged in education, employment, or training: a discrete choice experiment of service preferences in Canada.未接受教育、就业或培训的青年:加拿大服务偏好离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 27;24(1):1402. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18877-0.
2
Career and life development intervention for non-engaged youth: Evaluating the Hong Kong Benchmarks (Community) Pilot Program.针对未积极参与的青少年的职业与生活发展干预:评估香港基准(社区)试点项目。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 6;14:1117251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1117251. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Youth-oriented outcomes of education, employment and training interventions for upcoming youth: Protocol for a discrete choice experiment.针对未来青年的以青年为导向的教育、就业和培训干预措施的成果:离散选择实验方案
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;15(4):942-948. doi: 10.1111/eip.13039. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
2
Key attributes of integrated community-based youth service hubs for mental health: a scoping review.基于社区的青少年心理健康综合服务中心的关键属性:一项范围综述
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Jul 23;13:52. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0306-7. eCollection 2019.
3
Bridging the gap from welfare to education: Propensity score matching evaluation of a bridging intervention.从福利到教育的桥梁:衔接干预的倾向评分匹配评估。
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0216200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216200. eCollection 2019.
4
What makes mental health and substance use services youth friendly? A scoping review of literature.什么因素使心理健康和物质使用服务对青少年友好?文献综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 27;19(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4066-5.
5
Implementation of supported employment in the context of a national Canadian program: Facilitators, barriers and strategies.在加拿大国家项目背景下实施支持性就业:促进因素、障碍和策略。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Mar;43(1):2-8. doi: 10.1037/prj0000355. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
6
The Mental Health of Young Canadians Who Are Not Working or in School.加拿大非就业或非在校青年的心理健康。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 May;64(5):338-344. doi: 10.1177/0706743718815899. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
7
Factors associated with vocational disengagement among young people entering mental health treatment.与年轻人进入心理健康治疗后职业脱节相关的因素。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;13(4):961-968. doi: 10.1111/eip.12718. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
8
Engaging youth in research planning, design and execution: Practical recommendations for researchers.让青年参与研究规划、设计和执行:研究人员的实用建议。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):944-949. doi: 10.1111/hex.12795. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
9
NEET adolescents grown up: eight-year longitudinal follow-up of education, employment and mental health from adolescence to early adulthood in Mexico City.尼特青少年的成长:墨西哥城青少年到成年早期的教育、就业和心理健康的八年纵向随访。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;26(12):1459-1469. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-1004-0. Epub 2017 May 20.
10
Comparing predictors of part-time and no vocational engagement in youth primary mental health services: A brief report.比较青少年初级心理健康服务中兼职和无职业参与的预测因素:简要报告
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;12(4):726-729. doi: 10.1111/eip.12445. Epub 2017 May 19.