• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波碎石术期间超声监测的疗效:一项多机构倾向评分匹配研究。

Efficacy of ultrasound monitoring during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched study.

机构信息

Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Urology, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2022 Sep;29(9):1054-1060. doi: 10.1111/iju.14984. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1111/iju.14984
PMID:35871263
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-assisted monitoring during shock wave lithotripsy for kidney and proximal ureteral calculi.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 535 patients who initially underwent shock wave lithotripsy for renal or proximal ureteral calculi between January 2012 and December 2021. The patients were divided into the X-ray group (n = 294) and ultrasound plus X-ray group (n = 241) based on the methods of targeting and monitoring calculi during shock wave lithotripsy. Because of differences in patient backgrounds, 1:1 propensity score-based matching was performed. The primary endpoint was the stone-free rate.

RESULTS

In the final 1:1 matched cohort, 192 kidney stone cases and 162 proximal ureteral stone cases were analyzed. For patients with kidney calculi, the stone-free rate of the ultrasound plus X-ray group was significantly higher than that of the X-ray group (66.7% vs. 47.9%; P = 0.013). In the multivariate analysis, a large stone area (odds ratio 2.37), lower caliceal stones (odds ratio 3.37), and X-ray monitoring alone (odds ratio 0.49) were independently associated with shock wave lithotripsy failure. For patients with proximal ureteral stones, there was no significant difference in the stone-free rate between the ultrasound plus X-ray group and X-ray group (71.6% and 58.0%, respectively; P = 0.100). During the multivariate analysis, high computed tomography attenuation (odds ratio 2.31) and large stone area (odds ratio 2.18) were independent factors associated with residual stones after shock wave lithotripsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-assisted monitoring may contribute to a higher stone-free rate for patients with kidney calculi, but not for those with proximal ureteral calculi.

摘要

目的

评估超声辅助监测在冲击波碎石治疗肾结石和输尿管上段结石中的疗效。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间初次接受冲击波碎石治疗的 535 例肾结石或输尿管上段结石患者。根据冲击波碎石过程中结石的定位和监测方法,将患者分为 X 射线组(n=294)和超声联合 X 射线组(n=241)。由于患者背景存在差异,采用 1:1 倾向评分匹配。主要终点是结石清除率。

结果

在最终的 1:1 匹配队列中,分析了 192 例肾结石病例和 162 例输尿管上段结石病例。对于肾结石患者,超声联合 X 射线组的结石清除率明显高于 X 射线组(66.7%比 47.9%;P=0.013)。多因素分析显示,结石面积大(优势比 2.37)、下盏结石(优势比 3.37)和单独 X 射线监测(优势比 0.49)与冲击波碎石失败独立相关。对于输尿管上段结石患者,超声联合 X 射线组和 X 射线组的结石清除率无显著差异(分别为 71.6%和 58.0%;P=0.100)。多因素分析显示,CT 值高(优势比 2.31)和结石面积大(优势比 2.18)是冲击波碎石后结石残留的独立因素。

结论

超声辅助监测可能有助于提高肾结石患者的结石清除率,但对输尿管上段结石患者无效。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of ultrasound monitoring during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched study.体外冲击波碎石术期间超声监测的疗效:一项多机构倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Urol. 2022 Sep;29(9):1054-1060. doi: 10.1111/iju.14984. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases.体外冲击波碎石术作为儿童尿路结石的一线治疗方法:500 例病例的结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):661-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0133-0. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
3
Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.评估平均结石密度和皮肤至结石距离在预测肾和输尿管结石冲击波碎石术成功率中的重要性。
Urol Res. 2010 Aug;38(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
4
The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性下盏结石与孤立性中、上盏结石的疗效比较。
J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65509-7.
5
Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases.非增强 CT 三维平均结石密度可预测输尿管结石钬激光碎石术的疗效。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Dec;48(6):547-552. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01178-7. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
6
Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石疾病后,通过计算机断层扫描结果评估成功预测情况。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Jan;47(1):69-73. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0857-0. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
7
Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.用于预测体外冲击波碎石术后结石清除率的术前列线图。
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.089.
8
Efficacy of intravenous hydration during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in improving ureteral stone treatment success rate.静脉补液在体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石中的疗效观察。
Int J Urol. 2022 Jun;29(6):548-552. doi: 10.1111/iju.14836. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
9
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.一种用于预测儿童冲击波碎石术治疗结果的新列线图。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
10
Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.输尿管支架置入可预测输尿管结石患者接受体外冲击波碎石术的治疗效果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Nov;57(6):408-416. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408. Epub 2016 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of ultrasound imaging in the treatment of urinary tract stones.超声成像在尿路结石治疗中的应用。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2023 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s10396-023-01343-6.