PR Begg Chair in Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Emeritus Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Oct;11(5):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
To analyze the content, reliability, and quality of relevant TikTok videos regarding orthodontic retention.
Six relevant terms were searched on the TikTok social media Web site. Uploaded videos satisfying inclusion/exclusion criteria were assessed for the presence of nine predetermined content domains and categorized as "high-content" (≥5) or "low-content" (<5). Reliability was determined using the DISCERN instrument and quality by the Global Quality Score (GQS). Layperson videos were evaluated for themes using discourse analysis. Intraclass coefficients for content, DISCERN scores, and GQS were calculated for intrarater reliability. Statistical analysis was via IBM SPSS Statistics (version 27.0.0.0; SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL).
Orthodontists uploaded 37.8% and laypersons 34% of the 209 assessed videos. Just 22.1% of videos were considered to be 'high-content.' Quality of life issues related to retainer wear was the domain that was present least often in the videos provided by orthodontists (13.9%) and most often in those uploaded by laypersons (53.5%). High-content videos recorded greater mean GQS and DISCERN scores compared with low-content videos (P < 0.001). Strong positive associations existed between the number of domains present and DISCERN scores (rho = 0.808; P < 0.01) and between GQS and DISCERN scores (rho = 0.67; P < 0.01). Intraclass coefficient scores ranged between 0.92 and 0.98. Dissatisfaction with the need for long-term retainer wear was a prevalent negative theme in layperson videos.
The content, reliability, and quality of TikTok videos regarding orthodontic retention were poor. The orthodontic profession must use TikTok effectively to ensure it delivers high-quality information relevant to laypersons' concerns.
分析与正畸保持相关的 TikTok 视频的内容、可靠性和质量。
在 TikTok 社交媒体网站上搜索了六个相关术语。评估符合纳入/排除标准的上传视频是否存在九个预先确定的内容领域，并分为“高内容”（≥5）或“低内容”（<5）。使用 DISCERN 工具确定可靠性，并使用全球质量评分（GQS）确定质量。使用话语分析评估外行视频的主题。计算内容、DISCERN 评分和 GQS 的组内系数以确定内部评分者的可靠性。统计分析通过 IBM SPSS Statistics（版本 27.0.0.0；SPSS Inc.，芝加哥，IL）进行。
正畸医生上传了 37.8%的视频，外行上传了 34%的视频。只有 22.1%的视频被认为是“高内容”。与保持器佩戴相关的生活质量问题是正畸医生提供的视频中出现频率最低的领域（13.9%），而外行上传的视频中出现频率最高的领域（53.5%）。高内容视频的平均 GQS 和 DISCERN 评分高于低内容视频（P<0.001）。存在的领域数量与 DISCERN 评分之间存在强烈的正相关关系（rho=0.808；P<0.01），GQS 与 DISCERN 评分之间存在强烈的正相关关系（rho=0.67；P<0.01）。组内系数评分为 0.92 至 0.98 之间。对外行视频中对长期保持器佩戴需求的不满是一个普遍存在的负面主题。
与正畸保持相关的 TikTok 视频的内容、可靠性和质量都很差。正畸专业人员必须有效地利用 TikTok，确保它提供与非专业人士关注相关的高质量信息。
